The contributions of Rupert Best to the modern concept of the nature of viruses

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Andrew D. W. Geering
{"title":"The contributions of Rupert Best to the modern concept of the nature of viruses","authors":"Andrew D. W. Geering","doi":"10.1071/hr23022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rupert Jethro Best (1903–91), working alone at the Waite Agricultural Research Institute in Adelaide between 1934 and 1937, was among the first to purify tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and to propose that it was a complex macromolecule containing protein and another reactive group that was responsible for infectivity of the virus. However, his research was completely overshadowed by that of Wendell Stanley and the duo of Frederick Bawden and Norman (aka Bill) Pirie, working in the United States of America and Great Britain, respectively, to the point where Best is not even mentioned in modern histories of TMV. Many factors have contributed to this lack of recognition for Best. Professor James Prescott, a soil scientist and Best’s supervisor at the Waite Institute, failed to appreciate the significance of his research, leading to critical delays in publication that prevented him from claiming precedence for purifying TMV. When Best’s research was eventually published, it was in Australian journals that were not broadly distributed, resulting in minimal international exposure for his research. The plant virology community within which he worked in Australia was very small and entirely focused on plant disease control, and not concerned with fundamental questions about the composition of viruses. Communication with similarly interested scientists in the Northern Hemisphere was hindered by the great distances involved. In this paper, pioneering research done by Best on TMV is reviewed, and placed in context with that undertaken by Stanley and by Bawden and Pirie, who are best remembered for purifying TMV and characterising its physicochemical properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":51246,"journal":{"name":"Historical Records of Australian Science","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Records of Australian Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/hr23022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rupert Jethro Best (1903–91), working alone at the Waite Agricultural Research Institute in Adelaide between 1934 and 1937, was among the first to purify tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and to propose that it was a complex macromolecule containing protein and another reactive group that was responsible for infectivity of the virus. However, his research was completely overshadowed by that of Wendell Stanley and the duo of Frederick Bawden and Norman (aka Bill) Pirie, working in the United States of America and Great Britain, respectively, to the point where Best is not even mentioned in modern histories of TMV. Many factors have contributed to this lack of recognition for Best. Professor James Prescott, a soil scientist and Best’s supervisor at the Waite Institute, failed to appreciate the significance of his research, leading to critical delays in publication that prevented him from claiming precedence for purifying TMV. When Best’s research was eventually published, it was in Australian journals that were not broadly distributed, resulting in minimal international exposure for his research. The plant virology community within which he worked in Australia was very small and entirely focused on plant disease control, and not concerned with fundamental questions about the composition of viruses. Communication with similarly interested scientists in the Northern Hemisphere was hindered by the great distances involved. In this paper, pioneering research done by Best on TMV is reviewed, and placed in context with that undertaken by Stanley and by Bawden and Pirie, who are best remembered for purifying TMV and characterising its physicochemical properties.

鲁珀特-贝斯特对现代病毒本质概念的贡献
鲁珀特-杰斯罗-贝斯特(1903-91 年)于 1934 年至 1937 年在阿德莱德的怀特农业研究所独自工作,是最早纯化烟草花叶病毒(TMV)的人之一,并提出病毒的感染性是由一种含有蛋白质和另一种活性基团的复杂大分子造成的。然而,温德尔-斯坦利(Wendell Stanley)以及弗雷德里克-鲍登(Frederick Bawden)和诺曼(又名比尔)-皮里(Norman (aka Bill) Pirie)二人分别在美国和英国开展的研究完全掩盖了他的研究成果,以至于在现代烟草花叶病毒史中甚至都没有提到贝斯特。造成贝斯特不被认可的原因很多。詹姆斯-普雷斯科特(James Prescott)教授是一位土壤学家,也是贝斯特在怀特研究所的导师,但他没有意识到贝斯特研究的重要性,导致贝斯特的研究成果迟迟不能发表,使贝斯特无法获得纯化 TMV 的先例。贝斯特的研究成果最终发表在澳大利亚的期刊上,但这些期刊的发行范围并不广泛,导致他的研究成果在国际上的曝光率极低。他在澳大利亚工作的植物病毒学团体规模非常小,完全专注于植物疾病控制,并不关心病毒组成的基本问题。由于距离遥远,他无法与北半球同样感兴趣的科学家进行交流。本文回顾了贝斯特对 TMV 的开创性研究,并将其与斯坦利、鲍登和皮利的研究结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Historical Records of Australian Science
Historical Records of Australian Science HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
66.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Historical Records of Australian Science is a bi-annual journal that publishes two kinds of unsolicited manuscripts relating to the history of science, pure and applied, in Australia, New Zealand and the southwest Pacific. Historical Articles–original scholarly pieces of peer-reviewed research Historical Documents–either hitherto unpublished or obscurely published primary sources, along with a peer-reviewed scholarly introduction. The first issue of the journal (under the title Records of the Australian Academy of Science), appeared in 1966, and the current name was adopted in 1980.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信