A phantom study investigating effective strategies for reducing fetal dose in pregnant patients with head and neck cancer

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
WuiAnn Woon, Jacob Samuel, Khairina Wahab, Farhan Zaini, Fatin Hamadi, Andrew Lee CK, Vedapriya Ramamurthy, Shahidda Bohari
{"title":"A phantom study investigating effective strategies for reducing fetal dose in pregnant patients with head and neck cancer","authors":"WuiAnn Woon,&nbsp;Jacob Samuel,&nbsp;Khairina Wahab,&nbsp;Farhan Zaini,&nbsp;Fatin Hamadi,&nbsp;Andrew Lee CK,&nbsp;Vedapriya Ramamurthy,&nbsp;Shahidda Bohari","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To measure the out-of-field doses for various treatment planning techniques and assess the impact on fetal dose with and without the use of custom shielding.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of six treatment plans were generated with different treatment techniques such as 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), utilizing both 6 MV flattened beams and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The measurements were carried out both out-of-field at the surface and at depth to assess the dose reduction achieved by removing the flattening filter and incorporating shielding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The custom-made frame shielding can effectively reduce the surface dose with a maximum reduction of 15.2% observed in VMAT plans and achieve a maximum reduction of 100% for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Out-of-field dose measurements conducted at depth, positioned 58 cm inferior to the target isocenter, reveal that the shielding effectiveness consistently remains the greatest for 3DCRT technique. A maximum reduction of 21% is observed when utilizing a flattening filter-free beam.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of this study indicate that the 3DCRT technique exhibits the least amount of scatter radiation both near and far from the treatment isocenter, which is the most suitable approach for radiation therapy of pregnant patients. In cases where meeting dose constraints for critical organs becomes challenging, VMAT technique emerges as the most suitable treatment technique for reducing out-of-field doses. Additionally, a flattening filter-free beam significantly reduces out-of-field doses due to lower contributions from head scatter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To measure the out-of-field doses for various treatment planning techniques and assess the impact on fetal dose with and without the use of custom shielding.

Materials and methods

A total of six treatment plans were generated with different treatment techniques such as 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), utilizing both 6 MV flattened beams and flattening filter-free (FFF) beams. The measurements were carried out both out-of-field at the surface and at depth to assess the dose reduction achieved by removing the flattening filter and incorporating shielding.

Results

The custom-made frame shielding can effectively reduce the surface dose with a maximum reduction of 15.2% observed in VMAT plans and achieve a maximum reduction of 100% for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. Out-of-field dose measurements conducted at depth, positioned 58 cm inferior to the target isocenter, reveal that the shielding effectiveness consistently remains the greatest for 3DCRT technique. A maximum reduction of 21% is observed when utilizing a flattening filter-free beam.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that the 3DCRT technique exhibits the least amount of scatter radiation both near and far from the treatment isocenter, which is the most suitable approach for radiation therapy of pregnant patients. In cases where meeting dose constraints for critical organs becomes challenging, VMAT technique emerges as the most suitable treatment technique for reducing out-of-field doses. Additionally, a flattening filter-free beam significantly reduces out-of-field doses due to lower contributions from head scatter.

一项模型研究,调查减少妊娠期头颈癌患者胎儿剂量的有效策略。
目的:测量各种治疗计划技术的场外剂量,并评估使用和不使用定制屏蔽对胎儿剂量的影响:采用不同的治疗技术,如三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)、调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT),利用 6 MV 扁平化射束和无扁平化滤波(FFF)射束,共生成六种治疗计划。测量同时在表面和深度的场外进行,以评估去掉扁平化滤波器并加入屏蔽后所减少的剂量:结果:定制的框架屏蔽能有效减少表面剂量,在 VMAT 计划中观察到的最大减少量为 15.2%,在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像中观察到的最大减少量为 100%。在距离目标等中心下方 58 厘米的深度进行的场外剂量测量显示,3DCRT 技术的屏蔽效果一直是最好的。当使用扁平化无滤光器光束时,最大剂量减少了 21%:本研究结果表明,3DCRT 技术在治疗中心附近和远处的散射辐射量都最小,是最适合妊娠患者的放射治疗方法。在满足关键器官剂量限制成为挑战的情况下,VMAT 技术成为减少场外剂量的最合适治疗技术。此外,由于头部散射的贡献较低,扁平化无滤波器射束可显著降低场外剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信