Association of Hospitals' Experience with Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Model with the Diffusion of Acute Hospital Care at Home

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
So-Yeon Kang PhD, MBA, MPH
{"title":"Association of Hospitals' Experience with Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Model with the Diffusion of Acute Hospital Care at Home","authors":"So-Yeon Kang PhD, MBA, MPH","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine whether hospitals' experience in a prior payment model incentivizing care coordination is associated with their decision to adopt a new payment program for a care delivery innovation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Source<b>s</b></h3>\n \n <p>Data were sourced from Medicare fee-for-service claims in 2017, the list of participants in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement initiatives (BPCI and BPCI-Advanced), the list of hospitals approved for Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCaH) between November 2020 and August 2022, and the American Hospital Association Survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cohort study. Hospitals' adoption of AHCaH was measured as a function of hospitals' BPCI experiences. Hospitals' BPCI experiences were categorized into five mutually exclusive groups: (1) direct BPCI participation, (2) indirect participation through physician group practices (PGPs) after dropout, (3) indirect participation through PGPs only, (4) dropout only, and (5) no BPCI exposure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All data are derived from pre-existing sources. General acute hospitals eligible for both BPCI initiatives and AHCaH are included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of 3248 hospitals included in the sample, 7% adopted AHCaH as of August 2022. Hospitals with direct BPCI experience had the highest adoption rate (17.7%), followed by those with indirect participation through BPCI physicians after dropout (11.8%), while those with no exposure to BPCI were least likely to participate (3.2%). Hospitals that adopted AHCaH were more likely to be located in communities where more peer hospitals participated in the program (median 10.8% vs. 0%). After controlling for covariates, the association of the adoption of AHCaH with indirect participation through physicians after dropout was as strong as with early BPCI adopter hospitals (average marginal effect: 5.9 vs. 6.2 pp, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), but the other categories were not.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Hospitals that participated in the bundled payment model either directly or indirectly PGPs were more likely to adopt a care delivery innovation requiring similar competence in the next period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine whether hospitals' experience in a prior payment model incentivizing care coordination is associated with their decision to adopt a new payment program for a care delivery innovation.

Data Sources

Data were sourced from Medicare fee-for-service claims in 2017, the list of participants in Bundled Payment for Care Improvement initiatives (BPCI and BPCI-Advanced), the list of hospitals approved for Acute Hospital Care at Home (AHCaH) between November 2020 and August 2022, and the American Hospital Association Survey.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study. Hospitals' adoption of AHCaH was measured as a function of hospitals' BPCI experiences. Hospitals' BPCI experiences were categorized into five mutually exclusive groups: (1) direct BPCI participation, (2) indirect participation through physician group practices (PGPs) after dropout, (3) indirect participation through PGPs only, (4) dropout only, and (5) no BPCI exposure.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

All data are derived from pre-existing sources. General acute hospitals eligible for both BPCI initiatives and AHCaH are included.

Principal Findings

Of 3248 hospitals included in the sample, 7% adopted AHCaH as of August 2022. Hospitals with direct BPCI experience had the highest adoption rate (17.7%), followed by those with indirect participation through BPCI physicians after dropout (11.8%), while those with no exposure to BPCI were least likely to participate (3.2%). Hospitals that adopted AHCaH were more likely to be located in communities where more peer hospitals participated in the program (median 10.8% vs. 0%). After controlling for covariates, the association of the adoption of AHCaH with indirect participation through physicians after dropout was as strong as with early BPCI adopter hospitals (average marginal effect: 5.9 vs. 6.2 pp, p < 0.05), but the other categories were not.

Conclusions

Hospitals that participated in the bundled payment model either directly or indirectly PGPs were more likely to adopt a care delivery innovation requiring similar competence in the next period.

医院使用捆绑付费改善护理模式的经验与推广居家急症医院护理的关系。
目的研究医院之前在激励护理协调的支付模式中的经验是否与医院决定采用新的支付计划进行护理服务创新相关:数据来源:2017年医疗保险付费服务报销单、捆绑支付改善护理计划(BPCI和BPCI-Advanced)参与者名单、2020年11月至2022年8月期间获准开展 "居家急症医院护理"(AHCaH)的医院名单以及美国医院协会调查:研究设计:回顾性队列研究。医院采用 AHCaH 的情况与医院的 BPCI 经验息息相关。医院的 BPCI 经验分为五个互斥组:(1)直接参与 BPCI;(2)退出后通过医生团体实践(PGP)间接参与;(3)仅通过 PGP 间接参与;(4)仅退出;(5)未接触 BPCI:所有数据均来源于已有资料。主要研究结果:在纳入样本的 3248 家医院中,截至 2022 年 8 月,7% 的医院采用了 AHCaH。有直接 BPCI 经验的医院采用率最高(17.7%),其次是那些在退出后通过 BPCI 医生间接参与的医院(11.8%),而那些没有 BPCI 经验的医院参与的可能性最低(3.2%)。采用 AHCaH 的医院更有可能位于有更多同行医院参与该计划的社区(中位数为 10.8% 对 0%)。在控制协变量后,采用 AHCaH 与退出后通过医生间接参与的关联性与早期 BPCI 采用医院的关联性一样强(平均边际效应:5.9 pp vs. 6.2 pp,P 结论):直接或间接参与捆绑支付模式的医院更有可能在下一阶段采用需要类似能力的医疗服务创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信