Integrating agency and resource dependency theories: the moderating effect of board size on the relationship between dividends and firm value in Malaysia

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS
Mohd Ashari Bakri, Nurjeehan Ayub, Haneffa Muchlis Gazali
{"title":"Integrating agency and resource dependency theories: the moderating effect of board size on the relationship between dividends and firm value in Malaysia","authors":"Mohd Ashari Bakri, Nurjeehan Ayub, Haneffa Muchlis Gazali","doi":"10.1186/s43093-024-00324-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This paper aims to examine the moderating effects of board size on the relationship between dividends and firm value in Malaysian settings. The theoretical foundations of this research were the integration between agency and resources dependency theories.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Design/methodology/approach</h3><p>Panel data are extracted from DataStream and the annual report for the period of 2012 to 2021, and pooled OLS, random effects, and fixed effects analyses were employed to examine the relationship. Breusch–Pagan Lagrange multiplier (LM) test and the Hausman test used to determine the most appropriate between these three analyses (OLS, random effects, and fixed effects). The results are valid even after calculating the robust standard error to mitigate the potential heteroskedasticity and serial correlation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Findings</h3><p>The empirical results show that board size positively moderates the relationship between dividends and firm value in all the models tested. The results indicate that a larger board of size can minimize the agency problem (agency theory) because a larger board size can more effectively monitor and control management's opportunistic behavior due to more set of skilled and talented individuals included in the boardroom (resources dependency theory). Additionally, effective monitoring can also lead to the increase in dividend payout to maintain a good reputation among investors and simultaneously increase firm value.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Practical implication</h3><p>This study contributes to helping the regulators and industry players in Malaysia to improve existing guidelines for determining dividend and board size to increase firm value. The findings may also provide inputs to the policymakers in recommending the optimum dividend and board size that resulting an increase in valuation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Originality/value</h3><p>By incorporating agency and resources dependency theory, authors investigate the moderating effect of board size on dividend and firm value relationships in Malaysian markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":44859,"journal":{"name":"Future Business Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Business Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00324-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to examine the moderating effects of board size on the relationship between dividends and firm value in Malaysian settings. The theoretical foundations of this research were the integration between agency and resources dependency theories.

Design/methodology/approach

Panel data are extracted from DataStream and the annual report for the period of 2012 to 2021, and pooled OLS, random effects, and fixed effects analyses were employed to examine the relationship. Breusch–Pagan Lagrange multiplier (LM) test and the Hausman test used to determine the most appropriate between these three analyses (OLS, random effects, and fixed effects). The results are valid even after calculating the robust standard error to mitigate the potential heteroskedasticity and serial correlation.

Findings

The empirical results show that board size positively moderates the relationship between dividends and firm value in all the models tested. The results indicate that a larger board of size can minimize the agency problem (agency theory) because a larger board size can more effectively monitor and control management's opportunistic behavior due to more set of skilled and talented individuals included in the boardroom (resources dependency theory). Additionally, effective monitoring can also lead to the increase in dividend payout to maintain a good reputation among investors and simultaneously increase firm value.

Practical implication

This study contributes to helping the regulators and industry players in Malaysia to improve existing guidelines for determining dividend and board size to increase firm value. The findings may also provide inputs to the policymakers in recommending the optimum dividend and board size that resulting an increase in valuation.

Originality/value

By incorporating agency and resources dependency theory, authors investigate the moderating effect of board size on dividend and firm value relationships in Malaysian markets.

Abstract Image

代理理论与资源依赖理论的整合:马来西亚董事会规模对股息与公司价值之间关系的调节作用
本文旨在研究在马来西亚环境下,董事会规模对股息与公司价值之间关系的调节作用。本研究的理论基础是代理理论和资源依赖理论之间的整合。设计/方法/途径从 DataStream 和 2012 年至 2021 年的年报中提取面板数据,并采用集合 OLS、随机效应和固定效应分析来研究两者之间的关系。布赖乌什-帕根拉格朗日乘数(LM)检验和豪斯曼检验用于确定这三种分析(OLS、随机效应和固定效应)之间最合适的一种。实证结果表明,在所有测试模型中,董事会规模对股息与公司价值之间的关系具有正向调节作用。结果表明,董事会规模越大,代理问题(代理理论)就越小,因为董事会中有更多有技能、有才华的人,可以更有效地监督和控制管理层的机会主义行为(资源依赖理论)。此外,有效的监督也会导致股息支付的增加,从而在投资者中保持良好的声誉,并同时提高公司价值。 实际意义 本研究有助于帮助马来西亚的监管机构和行业参与者改进现有的股息和董事会规模确定准则,以提高公司价值。作者结合代理和资源依赖理论,研究了马来西亚市场中董事会规模对股息和公司价值关系的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.70%
发文量
53
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信