The influence of mentorship in workplace on teachers' professional development a meta-analysis based on 66 experiments

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Sihang Zhang, Xiaojun Ma, Huifen Xu, Jijian Lu
{"title":"The influence of mentorship in workplace on teachers' professional development a meta-analysis based on 66 experiments","authors":"Sihang Zhang, Xiaojun Ma, Huifen Xu, Jijian Lu","doi":"10.1108/jmp-11-2022-0588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper seeks to investigate the differences in the teachers’ professional development (TPD) by mentorship in workplace. The authors examined the role of mentorship in the PD of teachers and conducted a meta-analysis of pertinent empirical data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using data from over 2,900 individuals, 66 experiments and 12 countries, the authors presented a meta-analysis of the association between workplace mentorship and TPD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors concluded that mentoring activities could boost the TPD to some extent. It contributes positively to the discipline of science and language, kindergarten, individual mentoring and curriculum research. In addition, the periodicity should not exceed 1 year.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The results of the meta-analysis are restricted to short-term mentorship activities, and the sample size is modest. Building upon the findings from the literature review and meta-analysis, the authors delineated a research agenda for prospective investigations. This includes an imperative for further exploration into the nexus between mentoring and the PD of educators.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Based on the available literature and meta-analysis findings, the authors developed a framework for the “Experts in the classroom” TPD pattern.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is the first meta-analysis evaluating the association between mentorship and TPD.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-11-2022-0588","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper seeks to investigate the differences in the teachers’ professional development (TPD) by mentorship in workplace. The authors examined the role of mentorship in the PD of teachers and conducted a meta-analysis of pertinent empirical data.

Design/methodology/approach

Using data from over 2,900 individuals, 66 experiments and 12 countries, the authors presented a meta-analysis of the association between workplace mentorship and TPD.

Findings

The authors concluded that mentoring activities could boost the TPD to some extent. It contributes positively to the discipline of science and language, kindergarten, individual mentoring and curriculum research. In addition, the periodicity should not exceed 1 year.

Research limitations/implications

The results of the meta-analysis are restricted to short-term mentorship activities, and the sample size is modest. Building upon the findings from the literature review and meta-analysis, the authors delineated a research agenda for prospective investigations. This includes an imperative for further exploration into the nexus between mentoring and the PD of educators.

Practical implications

Based on the available literature and meta-analysis findings, the authors developed a framework for the “Experts in the classroom” TPD pattern.

Originality/value

This is the first meta-analysis evaluating the association between mentorship and TPD.

基于 66 项实验的荟萃分析:工作场所导师制对教师专业发展的影响
目的 本文旨在研究工作场所导师制对教师专业发展(TPD)的影响。作者研究了导师制在教师专业发展中的作用,并对相关经验数据进行了荟萃分析。研究结果作者得出结论,导师制活动可以在一定程度上促进教师专业发展。它对科学和语言学科、幼儿园、个人指导和课程研究都有积极的促进作用。此外,周期不应超过 1 年。研究局限性/意义荟萃分析的结果仅限于短期指导活动,且样本量不大。在文献综述和荟萃分析结果的基础上,作者为前瞻性调查制定了研究议程。实践意义根据现有文献和荟萃分析的结果,作者为 "专家进课堂 "TPD 模式制定了一个框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: ■Communication and its influence on action ■Developments in leadership styles ■How managers achieve success ■How work design affects job motivation ■Influences on managerial priorities and time allocation ■Managing conflicts ■The decision-making process in Eastern and Western business cultures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信