The use of orthoimagery and stereoscopic aerial imagery to identify muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) houses

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 Environmental Science
Janet E. Greenhorn, Carrie Sadowski, Jennifer A. Rodgers, Jeff Bowman
{"title":"The use of orthoimagery and stereoscopic aerial imagery to identify muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) houses","authors":"Janet E. Greenhorn, Carrie Sadowski, Jennifer A. Rodgers, Jeff Bowman","doi":"10.1002/wsb.1519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The muskrat (<i>Ondatra zibethicus</i>) is considered a ubiquitous inhabitant of wetlands across Canada and the United States, but recent studies indicate that muskrat populations in many parts of North America have experienced substantial declines over the last 40–60 years. Monitoring of muskrat abundance is therefore an important task for wildlife managers, but traditional methods such as house counts conducted during ground-based surveys can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Poor conditions or a lack of access may limit how much of a wetland can be surveyed. Aerial imagery has previously been used to census a diverse array of wildlife populations but is not yet a common tool for muskrat surveys. To investigate the accuracy of this alternative survey method, we collected aerial imagery from coastal wetlands along the north shore of Lake Ontario during the winter of 2014 for examination in both 2D orthorectified and 3D stereoscopic formats. We compared muskrat house counts obtained from imagery to counts recorded by ground survey crews in the same wetlands during the same winter. We found no significant difference between mean muskrat house counts obtained by ground survey crews and orthoimagery observers. In contrast, stereoscopic imagery observers overestimated mean house counts compared to ground survey crews, which we interpret was due to an increase in false positives. Our results indicate that orthoimagery is a promising tool for assessing muskrat occupancy, provides comparable broad-scale results to traditional ground survey methods, and may be preferable to wildlife managers for a variety of reasons.","PeriodicalId":23845,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) is considered a ubiquitous inhabitant of wetlands across Canada and the United States, but recent studies indicate that muskrat populations in many parts of North America have experienced substantial declines over the last 40–60 years. Monitoring of muskrat abundance is therefore an important task for wildlife managers, but traditional methods such as house counts conducted during ground-based surveys can be labor-intensive and time-consuming. Poor conditions or a lack of access may limit how much of a wetland can be surveyed. Aerial imagery has previously been used to census a diverse array of wildlife populations but is not yet a common tool for muskrat surveys. To investigate the accuracy of this alternative survey method, we collected aerial imagery from coastal wetlands along the north shore of Lake Ontario during the winter of 2014 for examination in both 2D orthorectified and 3D stereoscopic formats. We compared muskrat house counts obtained from imagery to counts recorded by ground survey crews in the same wetlands during the same winter. We found no significant difference between mean muskrat house counts obtained by ground survey crews and orthoimagery observers. In contrast, stereoscopic imagery observers overestimated mean house counts compared to ground survey crews, which we interpret was due to an increase in false positives. Our results indicate that orthoimagery is a promising tool for assessing muskrat occupancy, provides comparable broad-scale results to traditional ground survey methods, and may be preferable to wildlife managers for a variety of reasons.

Abstract Image

利用正射影像和立体航空图像识别麝鼠(Ondatra zibethicus)的住所
麝鼠(Ondatra zibethicus)被认为是加拿大和美国湿地无处不在的居民,但最近的研究表明,北美许多地区的麝鼠种群数量在过去 40-60 年间经历了大幅下降。因此,监测麝鼠的数量是野生动物管理者的一项重要任务,但传统方法(如在地面调查期间进行的家鼠计数)可能需要大量人力和时间。恶劣的条件或交通不便可能会限制湿地的调查范围。航空图像以前曾用于普查各种野生动物种群,但尚未成为麝鼠调查的常用工具。为了研究这种替代调查方法的准确性,我们在 2014 年冬季收集了安大略湖北岸沿岸湿地的航空图像,并以二维正射影像和三维立体图像格式进行了检查。我们将从图像中获得的麝鼠房舍计数与地面调查人员在同一冬季在相同湿地记录的计数进行了比较。我们发现,地面勘测人员和正射影像观测人员获得的平均麝鼠房舍数量没有明显差异。相反,与地面勘测人员相比,立体图像观测人员高估了平均麝鼠房舍数量,我们认为这是由于假阳性增加所致。我们的研究结果表明,正射影像技术是评估麝鼠栖息地的一种很有前途的工具,它能提供与传统地面调查方法相当的大范围结果,而且由于各种原因,它可能更适合野生动物管理者使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Wildlife Society Bulletin BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Wildlife Society Bulletin is a journal for wildlife practitioners that effectively integrates cutting edge science with management and conservation, and also covers important policy issues, particularly those that focus on the integration of science and policy. Wildlife Society Bulletin includes articles on contemporary wildlife management and conservation, education, administration, law enforcement, and review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. This includes: Reports on practices designed to achieve wildlife management or conservation goals. Presentation of new techniques or evaluation of techniques for studying or managing wildlife. Retrospective analyses of wildlife management and conservation programs, including the reasons for success or failure. Analyses or reports of wildlife policies, regulations, education, administration, law enforcement. Review articles on the philosophy and history of wildlife management and conservation. as well as other pertinent topics that are deemed more appropriate for the Wildlife Society Bulletin than for The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews that focus on applied research, policy or wildlife management and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信