The Vanishing South: Race and the Ecogothic in Ambrose Bierce and Charles Chesnutt

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Kevin Corstorphine
{"title":"The Vanishing South: Race and the Ecogothic in Ambrose Bierce and Charles Chesnutt","authors":"Kevin Corstorphine","doi":"10.1353/saf.2023.a923094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Vanishing South: <span>Race and the Ecogothic in Ambrose Bierce and Charles Chesnutt</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Kevin Corstorphine (bio) </li> </ul> <p><strong>A</strong>mbrose Bierce (1842–c.1914), known in his lifetime as an acerbic journalist and author of short stories, can easily be seen as a singular figure. His work is sometimes read for its vivid and brutal portrayal of the Civil War (in which he fought for the Union army) and sometimes through its deserved place in the canon of American “weird” fiction. It bridges the gap between Poe and Lovecraft in its blend of the gothic, the supernatural, and science fiction. Bierce’s disappearance, seemingly after traveling into Mexico at the age of 71, is prefigured in his fiction by strange tales of mysterious vanishings. Similarly, the story of Charles W. Chesnutt (1858–1932) is overshadowed by his crucial place in African American literary history as a writer who offered both fantastical and realist portrayals of Black life in the Reconstruction era. Here, I argue that both authors, specifically in Bierce’s “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field” (1888) and Chesnutt’s <em>The Conjure Woman</em> (1899), engage in their fiction with an ecological perspective that simultaneously decenters and reasserts the specificity of racial experience in their time.</p> <p>I contend that the racial truths within gothic fiction have been neglected due to their narrative displacement onto the environment, highlighting the crucial need for further attention to race within ecocriticism. Social constructions of race are irrelevant in the context of the natural world, but manage to produce separate spheres of experience that might seem fantastical were their consequences not so real. Despite their overlapping careers, the authors are not usually considered in terms of their shared concerns. In doing so, I argue that they provide an important insight into the relationship between “nature” and racial categorization at the crucial juncture in American social and political life at which they wrote. It is appropriate, given the fantastical nature of how we have divided humans into races and how we have constructed the notion of a definable nature, that <strong>[End Page 55]</strong> supernatural fiction is the means by which this insight is achieved. Here, I examine the intersection of ‘nature’ and race through a comparative analysis of Bierce’s short story and several of Chesnutt’s, focusing on “Mars Jeems’s Nightmare,” “Po’ Sandy,” and “The Goophered Grapevine.”</p> <h2>Race, the Supernatural, and the Gothic</h2> <p>Bierce’s “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field,” published in the <em>San Francisco Examiner</em> in 1888, consists of fewer than eight hundred words and recounts one bizarre incident, without explanation and with barely any context. A plantation owner called Williamson gets up to walk across to a nearby field in order to relay a message to his overseer, Andrew. In crossing the unoccupied field between his own house and garden and the field where Andrew and a team of enslaved people are working, he vanishes. The closest witnesses are a neighbor called Armour Wren and his son James, together with the coach driver and an enslaved man called Sam. They are all momentarily distracted when the horses pulling their carriage stumble, causing them to lose sight of Williamson, who never reappears. The first part of the story is told in the third person, while the second shifts to a first-person legal testimony from Wren’s perspective. It then concludes by stating that “the courts decided that Williamson was dead, and his estate was distributed according to law.”<sup>1</sup> The structure is not unlike that of many of Bierce’s other short stories, including “The Damned Thing” (1893), which likewise takes the form of a legal inquiry, although in this case the corpse of a dead man is present, and it is the creature that killed him that has disappeared, seemingly invisible from the start. Bierce shows a fascination with the past: there is a sense of a lost era that has passed almost into myth, lending itself (as European gothic did with its settings in the medieval past) to supernatural fiction. In “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field,” the antebellum South performs a similar function as a simultaneously exotic and familiar period setting, with clear parallels to Chesnutt’s local color style...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":42494,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","volume":"234 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/saf.2023.a923094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Vanishing South: Race and the Ecogothic in Ambrose Bierce and Charles Chesnutt
  • Kevin Corstorphine (bio)

Ambrose Bierce (1842–c.1914), known in his lifetime as an acerbic journalist and author of short stories, can easily be seen as a singular figure. His work is sometimes read for its vivid and brutal portrayal of the Civil War (in which he fought for the Union army) and sometimes through its deserved place in the canon of American “weird” fiction. It bridges the gap between Poe and Lovecraft in its blend of the gothic, the supernatural, and science fiction. Bierce’s disappearance, seemingly after traveling into Mexico at the age of 71, is prefigured in his fiction by strange tales of mysterious vanishings. Similarly, the story of Charles W. Chesnutt (1858–1932) is overshadowed by his crucial place in African American literary history as a writer who offered both fantastical and realist portrayals of Black life in the Reconstruction era. Here, I argue that both authors, specifically in Bierce’s “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field” (1888) and Chesnutt’s The Conjure Woman (1899), engage in their fiction with an ecological perspective that simultaneously decenters and reasserts the specificity of racial experience in their time.

I contend that the racial truths within gothic fiction have been neglected due to their narrative displacement onto the environment, highlighting the crucial need for further attention to race within ecocriticism. Social constructions of race are irrelevant in the context of the natural world, but manage to produce separate spheres of experience that might seem fantastical were their consequences not so real. Despite their overlapping careers, the authors are not usually considered in terms of their shared concerns. In doing so, I argue that they provide an important insight into the relationship between “nature” and racial categorization at the crucial juncture in American social and political life at which they wrote. It is appropriate, given the fantastical nature of how we have divided humans into races and how we have constructed the notion of a definable nature, that [End Page 55] supernatural fiction is the means by which this insight is achieved. Here, I examine the intersection of ‘nature’ and race through a comparative analysis of Bierce’s short story and several of Chesnutt’s, focusing on “Mars Jeems’s Nightmare,” “Po’ Sandy,” and “The Goophered Grapevine.”

Race, the Supernatural, and the Gothic

Bierce’s “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field,” published in the San Francisco Examiner in 1888, consists of fewer than eight hundred words and recounts one bizarre incident, without explanation and with barely any context. A plantation owner called Williamson gets up to walk across to a nearby field in order to relay a message to his overseer, Andrew. In crossing the unoccupied field between his own house and garden and the field where Andrew and a team of enslaved people are working, he vanishes. The closest witnesses are a neighbor called Armour Wren and his son James, together with the coach driver and an enslaved man called Sam. They are all momentarily distracted when the horses pulling their carriage stumble, causing them to lose sight of Williamson, who never reappears. The first part of the story is told in the third person, while the second shifts to a first-person legal testimony from Wren’s perspective. It then concludes by stating that “the courts decided that Williamson was dead, and his estate was distributed according to law.”1 The structure is not unlike that of many of Bierce’s other short stories, including “The Damned Thing” (1893), which likewise takes the form of a legal inquiry, although in this case the corpse of a dead man is present, and it is the creature that killed him that has disappeared, seemingly invisible from the start. Bierce shows a fascination with the past: there is a sense of a lost era that has passed almost into myth, lending itself (as European gothic did with its settings in the medieval past) to supernatural fiction. In “The Difficulty of Crossing a Field,” the antebellum South performs a similar function as a simultaneously exotic and familiar period setting, with clear parallels to Chesnutt’s local color style...

消失的南方安布罗斯-比尔斯和查尔斯-切斯纳特笔下的种族与生态哥特
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 消失的南方:安布罗斯-比尔斯(1842-c.1914 年)生前以尖刻的记者和短篇小说作家而闻名,他很容易被视为一个独特的人物。他的作品有时因其对南北战争生动而残酷的描写(他曾在南北战争中为联邦军作战)而为人所津津乐道,有时则因其在美国 "怪诞 "小说中当之无愧的地位而为人所津津乐道。它融合了哥特式、超自然和科幻小说的元素,在坡和洛夫克拉夫特之间架起了一座桥梁。比尔斯 71 岁时似乎在墨西哥旅行后失踪,这在他的小说中被神秘消失的奇怪故事所预示。同样,查尔斯-W-切斯纳特(Charles W. Chesnutt,1858-1932 年)在美国黑人文学史上的重要地位也被掩盖了,因为他是一位对重建时期黑人生活进行幻想和现实主义描写的作家。在这里,我认为这两位作家,特别是在比尔斯的《穿越田野的困难》(1888 年)和切斯纳特的《女魔术师》(1899 年)中,都以一种生态学的视角来创作小说,这种视角同时去伪存真,重申了他们那个时代种族经验的特殊性。我认为,哥特小说中的种族真相因其叙事上的环境转移而被忽视,这凸显了在生态批评中进一步关注种族问题的迫切需要。种族的社会建构在自然世界的语境中无关紧要,但却设法产生了独立的经验领域,如果其后果不是如此真实,这些领域可能会显得虚幻。尽管他们的职业生涯有所重叠,但人们通常不会从他们共同关注的问题的角度来考虑他们。我认为,在他们写作的那个美国社会和政治生活的关键时刻,他们为 "自然 "和种族分类之间的关系提供了重要的见解。鉴于我们是如何将人类划分为不同种族以及我们是如何构建可定义的自然概念的,超自然小说是实现这种洞察力的手段。在此,我将通过对比尔斯的短篇小说和切斯纳特的几篇短篇小说的比较分析,研究 "自然 "与种族的交集,重点是 "马尔斯-杰姆斯的噩梦"、"波'桑迪 "和 "果腹的葡萄藤"。种族、超自然和哥特式 比尔斯的《穿越田野的困难》发表于 1888 年的《旧金山考察者报》,全文不到八百字,叙述了一件离奇的事件,没有任何解释,也几乎没有任何背景。一位名叫威廉姆森的种植园主起身走到附近的一块田地,向监工安德鲁传达一个信息。在穿过他自己的房子和花园与安德鲁和一队奴隶正在劳作的田地之间的空地时,他消失了。最近的目击者是邻居阿莫-沃伦和他的儿子詹姆斯,还有马车夫和一个叫萨姆的被奴役者。拉车的马匹绊了一下,他们一时分神,失去了威廉姆森的踪影,而威廉姆森却再也没有出现。故事的前半部分是以第三人称讲述的,后半部分则转为以第一人称沃伦的视角提供法律证词。故事的结构与比尔斯的许多其他短篇小说并无二致,包括《该死的东西》(1893 年),该小说同样采用了法律调查的形式,不过在这个故事中,死人的尸体是存在的,而杀死他的生物却消失了,似乎从一开始就看不见。比尔斯表现出对过去的迷恋:有一种逝去的时代几乎成为神话的感觉,它本身(就像欧洲哥特式小说以中世纪为背景一样)适合超自然小说。在《穿越田野的困难》中,前铃铛时期的南方发挥了类似的作用,既是异国情调,又是熟悉的时代背景,与切斯纳特的地方色彩风格有着明显的相似之处......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION
STUDIES IN AMERICAN FICTION LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studies in American Fiction suspended publication in the fall of 2008. In the future, however, Fordham University and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York will jointly edit and publish SAF after a short hiatus; further information and updates will be available from time to time through the web site of Northeastern’s Department of English. SAF thanks the College of Arts and Sciences at Northeastern University for over three decades of support. Studies in American Fiction is a journal of articles and reviews on the prose fiction of the United States, in its full historical range from the colonial period to the present.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信