The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus by Anne Starr Kreps (review)

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Pamela Reaves
{"title":"The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus by Anne Starr Kreps (review)","authors":"Pamela Reaves","doi":"10.1353/earl.2024.a923172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus</em> by Anne Starr Kreps <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Pamela Reaves </li> </ul> Anne Starr Kreps<br/> <em>The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus</em><br/> Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion<br/> Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022<br/> Pp. 186. $65.00. <p>In <em>The Crucified Book</em>, Anne Starr Kreps explores this distinctive image from the <em>Gospel of Truth</em> as part of the broader textual scene of the second century <small>c.e.</small> Depicting a dying Jesus cloaked in a book and the crucifixion as an act of publication, the <em>Gospel of Truth</em> expands our understanding of early Christian \"scriptural practices\" (6). Attentive to the bodily and oral dimensions of this gospel, Kreps asserts that \"the <em>Gospel of Truth</em> promoted the conception of books as living documents, permitting the generation of religious books by multiple authors as new sources of revelatory authority\" (2). She grounds her argument through a series of chapters that productively contextualize and complicate notions of sacred writing. A brief introductory chapter reminds readers of fluidity in early Christian conceptions of gospel and positions Valentinus, whom she identifies as the author of the <em>Gospel of Truth</em>, as a central, rather than peripheral, figure in this \"landscape of shifting textualities\" (12).</p> <p>In Chapter One, \"The Joyful Gospel,\" Kreps aligns the <em>Gospel of Truth</em>'s interest in continual revelation with contemporary Jewish, Christian, and Roman currents. The Gospel of John and Justin Martyr similarly envision ongoing expressions of the gospel. And Ben Sira, <em>Genesis Rabbah</em>, and Philo provide parallels for the <em>Gospel of Truth</em>'s \"book encompassed in the flesh\" (24). In its expression of a \"shape-shifting mode of revelation\" (26), the <em>Gospel of Truth</em> is thus not an \"outlier\" (18). As she considers comparable contemporary views, Kreps effectively unpacks the scriptural dimensions of the text's unusual crucifixion scenes. Jesus, she describes, is \"transformed into a scroll of knowledge of the Father, which he published through an oration of its contents\" (34); scripture thus operates visually, aurally, and authoritatively, she asserts. The publication of the book involves its ongoing reception as well as risk of corruption. Kreps explains, \"The book was 'published' as it was received on the hearts of the truly wise, who could then distribute their own versions\" (35). Corruption, a concern apparent in Roman literary culture, is mitigated, Kreps highlights, through the gospel's divine inscription on the hearts of learned followers.</p> <p>This scriptural community of followers is the focus of Chapter Two, \"The Valentinian Gospel as a Scriptural Practice.\" Here, Kreps casts books of the heart as \"interior sacred textuality\" (43), exhibited in other Jewish (<em>4 Ezra</em> and Philo) and Christian (Irenaeus) writings and developed in Valentinian traditions (Valentinus, Heracleon, and Ptolemy). This bodily expression of scripture has the potential both to supersede imperfect written forms and to facilitate further production of Valentinian texts. This multiplicity of revelation, Kreps notes, is precisely what irked the opponents of Valentinus and his followers. In Chapter Three, \"The <em>Gospel of Truth</em> According to the Christian Heresiologists,\" she examines how heresiological discourse sets a closed canon against a fluid one. The latter, she highlights, is neither deviant (as demonstrated in the previous chapter) nor theoretical. Rather, it reflects Valentinian practice. Irenaeus and Tertullian, Kreps highlights, \"displayed remarkable awareness of their Valentinian opponent's <strong>[End Page 135]</strong> revelatory epistemology,\" disputing \"the notion that humans could function as eminent texts\" (59). Kreps's discussion of Irenaeus's apparent \"inversion\" (73) of Valentinian modes of reading is a particularly illuminating contribution. She tracks such discourse into the fourth century, when Epiphanius critiques the proliferation of books and their erroneous visionary claims as counter to uniform scripture. Kreps treats the fourth-century Jung Codex (NHC I) as representative of the kind of \"living canon\" critiqued by the heresiologists. She suggests that the <em>Gospel of Truth</em>, as \"a book about books, endorsing a theory of open revelation,\" encouraged the inclusion of other texts that exhibit varied modes of revelatory authority (87). For Kreps, the organization of the codex, which permits continual revelation, illustrates \"that the Valentinian counter-canon was not an invention of the heresiologists, but rather a viable scriptural practice that faded away as orthodoxy crystallized\" (64).</p> <p>A related...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44662,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2024.a923172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus by Anne Starr Kreps
  • Pamela Reaves
Anne Starr Kreps
The Crucified Book: Sacred Writing in the Age of Valentinus
Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion
Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022
Pp. 186. $65.00.

In The Crucified Book, Anne Starr Kreps explores this distinctive image from the Gospel of Truth as part of the broader textual scene of the second century c.e. Depicting a dying Jesus cloaked in a book and the crucifixion as an act of publication, the Gospel of Truth expands our understanding of early Christian "scriptural practices" (6). Attentive to the bodily and oral dimensions of this gospel, Kreps asserts that "the Gospel of Truth promoted the conception of books as living documents, permitting the generation of religious books by multiple authors as new sources of revelatory authority" (2). She grounds her argument through a series of chapters that productively contextualize and complicate notions of sacred writing. A brief introductory chapter reminds readers of fluidity in early Christian conceptions of gospel and positions Valentinus, whom she identifies as the author of the Gospel of Truth, as a central, rather than peripheral, figure in this "landscape of shifting textualities" (12).

In Chapter One, "The Joyful Gospel," Kreps aligns the Gospel of Truth's interest in continual revelation with contemporary Jewish, Christian, and Roman currents. The Gospel of John and Justin Martyr similarly envision ongoing expressions of the gospel. And Ben Sira, Genesis Rabbah, and Philo provide parallels for the Gospel of Truth's "book encompassed in the flesh" (24). In its expression of a "shape-shifting mode of revelation" (26), the Gospel of Truth is thus not an "outlier" (18). As she considers comparable contemporary views, Kreps effectively unpacks the scriptural dimensions of the text's unusual crucifixion scenes. Jesus, she describes, is "transformed into a scroll of knowledge of the Father, which he published through an oration of its contents" (34); scripture thus operates visually, aurally, and authoritatively, she asserts. The publication of the book involves its ongoing reception as well as risk of corruption. Kreps explains, "The book was 'published' as it was received on the hearts of the truly wise, who could then distribute their own versions" (35). Corruption, a concern apparent in Roman literary culture, is mitigated, Kreps highlights, through the gospel's divine inscription on the hearts of learned followers.

This scriptural community of followers is the focus of Chapter Two, "The Valentinian Gospel as a Scriptural Practice." Here, Kreps casts books of the heart as "interior sacred textuality" (43), exhibited in other Jewish (4 Ezra and Philo) and Christian (Irenaeus) writings and developed in Valentinian traditions (Valentinus, Heracleon, and Ptolemy). This bodily expression of scripture has the potential both to supersede imperfect written forms and to facilitate further production of Valentinian texts. This multiplicity of revelation, Kreps notes, is precisely what irked the opponents of Valentinus and his followers. In Chapter Three, "The Gospel of Truth According to the Christian Heresiologists," she examines how heresiological discourse sets a closed canon against a fluid one. The latter, she highlights, is neither deviant (as demonstrated in the previous chapter) nor theoretical. Rather, it reflects Valentinian practice. Irenaeus and Tertullian, Kreps highlights, "displayed remarkable awareness of their Valentinian opponent's [End Page 135] revelatory epistemology," disputing "the notion that humans could function as eminent texts" (59). Kreps's discussion of Irenaeus's apparent "inversion" (73) of Valentinian modes of reading is a particularly illuminating contribution. She tracks such discourse into the fourth century, when Epiphanius critiques the proliferation of books and their erroneous visionary claims as counter to uniform scripture. Kreps treats the fourth-century Jung Codex (NHC I) as representative of the kind of "living canon" critiqued by the heresiologists. She suggests that the Gospel of Truth, as "a book about books, endorsing a theory of open revelation," encouraged the inclusion of other texts that exhibit varied modes of revelatory authority (87). For Kreps, the organization of the codex, which permits continual revelation, illustrates "that the Valentinian counter-canon was not an invention of the heresiologists, but rather a viable scriptural practice that faded away as orthodoxy crystallized" (64).

A related...

被钉在十字架上的书:Anne Starr Kreps 所著的《Valentinus 时代的圣书写作》(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: The Crucified Book:Anne Starr Kreps 著 Pamela Reaves Anne Starr Kreps 译 The Crucified Book:瓦伦提努斯时代的神圣书写占卜:重读古代晚期宗教 费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2022 年,第 186 页。186.$65.00.在《被钉十字架的书》一书中,安妮-斯塔尔-克雷普斯将《真理福音》中这一独特的形象作为公元前 2 世纪更广泛的文本场景的一部分进行了探讨。《真理福音》描绘了披着书的垂死的耶稣和作为出版行为的钉十字架,拓展了我们对早期基督教 "经文实践 "的理解(6)。克雷普斯注意到这本福音书的身体和口头层面,断言"《真理福音》促进了将书籍视为活文件的观念,允许多位作者创作宗教书籍,作为启示性权威的新来源"(2)。她通过一系列章节论证了她的论点,这些章节有效地将圣书的概念背景化和复杂化。简短的介绍性章节提醒读者早期基督教福音概念的流动性,并将她认定为《真理福音》作者的瓦伦蒂诺定位为这一 "不断变化的文本性景观 "中的中心人物,而非边缘人物(12)。在第一章 "喜悦的福音 "中,Kreps 将《真理福音》对持续启示的兴趣与当代犹太教、基督教和罗马教的潮流相联系。约翰福音》和贾斯汀-烈士同样设想了福音的持续表达。本-西拉》、《创世纪》和斐洛为《真理福音》的 "肉身之书"(24)提供了相似之处。因此,《真理福音》在表达 "不断变化的启示模式"(26)时,并非 "离群索居"(18)。在考虑当代可比观点时,Kreps 有效地解读了文本中不同寻常的耶稣受难场景的圣经层面。她描述说,耶稣 "变成了一卷关于天父知识的书卷,他通过对书卷内容的演说将其出版"(34);她断言,经文因此在视觉上、听觉上和权威性上发挥作用。这本书的出版涉及到对它的持续接受以及被篡改的风险。克雷普斯解释说:"这本书是'出版'的,因为它被真正的智者所接受,然后他们可以分发自己的版本"(35)。克雷普斯强调说,腐败是罗马文学文化中的一个明显问题,但通过将福音书神圣地铭刻在博学的追随者心中,腐败问题得到了缓解。第二章 "作为圣经实践的瓦伦丁福音 "的重点就是这个由追随者组成的圣经社区。在这里,克雷普斯将心灵之书视为 "内部神圣文本"(43),在其他犹太教(《以斯拉记》第 4 章和斐洛)和基督教(爱任纽)著作中均有体现,并在瓦伦提尼传统(瓦伦提努斯、赫拉克里翁和托勒密)中得到了发展。经文的这种身体表达方式既有可能取代不完善的书面形式,也有可能促进瓦伦提尼文本的进一步创作。克雷普斯指出,这种启示的多重性正是瓦伦提努斯及其追随者的反对者所恼火的。在第三章 "基督教预言学家眼中的真理福音 "中,她探讨了预言学话语如何将封闭的正典与流动的正典对立起来。她强调,后者既不是离经叛道的(如前一章所述),也不是理论上的。相反,它反映了瓦伦丁式的实践。Kreps 强调,爱任纽和良知 "对他们的瓦伦丁对手的启示认识论表现出了非凡的认识",对 "人类可以作为杰出文本的概念 "提出了质疑(59)。Kreps 对爱任纽明显 "颠倒"(73)瓦伦提尼派阅读模式的讨论尤其具有启发性。她将这种论述追溯到了四世纪,当时埃皮法尼乌斯批判了书籍的泛滥及其错误的异象主张,认为它们与统一的经文背道而驰。Kreps 将四世纪的《荣格法典》(NHC I)视为异端学家所批判的 "活教规 "的代表。她认为,《真理福音》作为 "一本关于书籍的书,赞同开放启示理论",鼓励将其他展现不同启示权威模式的文本纳入其中(87)。对 Kreps 来说,允许持续启示的手抄本的组织形式说明了 "瓦伦丁式的反正典并非异端学家的发明,而是一种可行的经文实践,随着正统观念的固化而逐渐消失"(64)。相关的...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The official publication of the North American Patristics Society (NAPS), the Journal of Early Christian Studies focuses on the study of Christianity in the context of late ancient societies and religions from c.e. 100-700. Incorporating The Second Century (an earlier publication), the Journal publishes the best of traditional patristics scholarship while showcasing articles that call attention to newer themes and methodologies than those appearing in other patristics journals. An extensive book review section is featured in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信