Green Energy Pathways Towards Carbon Neutrality

George E. Halkos, Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis
{"title":"Green Energy Pathways Towards Carbon Neutrality","authors":"George E. Halkos, Panagiotis-Stavros C. Aslanidis","doi":"10.1007/s10640-024-00856-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Trying to reach carbon neutrality is by no means plain sailing in times of energy crisis, price volatility, and war. The European Green Deal (EGD) prioritizes green pathways, but it is not enough when it copes with greenhouse gases (GHGs). The present research utilizes the Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index (MLPI) to estimate advancements in total factor productivity (TFP) in the European Union (EU). The study uses panel data from 1995 to 2019, in addition, there is comparison between two periods: 1995 – 1996 and 2018 – 2019, would provide important information about TFP progress or recession during a turbulent European era. Two MLPI models are applied, one that utilizes only non-renewable energy sources (NRES), while the other adopts renewable energy sources (RES). Encompassing inputs such as: electricity generation, labour force, and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF); desirable output: gross domestic product; and undesirable outputs: carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>). There is average productivity progress, more specifically the MLPI average productivity for NRES and RES is 2.14% and 7.34% respectively, meaning that the RES adoption leads to greater productivity performance by almost three times. This novel analysis might offer useful and practical information to policymakers through the measuring of TFP in order to effectively attain and accomplish carbon neutrality objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":501498,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Resource Economics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00856-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trying to reach carbon neutrality is by no means plain sailing in times of energy crisis, price volatility, and war. The European Green Deal (EGD) prioritizes green pathways, but it is not enough when it copes with greenhouse gases (GHGs). The present research utilizes the Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index (MLPI) to estimate advancements in total factor productivity (TFP) in the European Union (EU). The study uses panel data from 1995 to 2019, in addition, there is comparison between two periods: 1995 – 1996 and 2018 – 2019, would provide important information about TFP progress or recession during a turbulent European era. Two MLPI models are applied, one that utilizes only non-renewable energy sources (NRES), while the other adopts renewable energy sources (RES). Encompassing inputs such as: electricity generation, labour force, and gross fixed capital formation (GFCF); desirable output: gross domestic product; and undesirable outputs: carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). There is average productivity progress, more specifically the MLPI average productivity for NRES and RES is 2.14% and 7.34% respectively, meaning that the RES adoption leads to greater productivity performance by almost three times. This novel analysis might offer useful and practical information to policymakers through the measuring of TFP in order to effectively attain and accomplish carbon neutrality objectives.

Abstract Image

实现碳中和的绿色能源之路
在能源危机、价格波动和战争时期,试图实现碳中和绝非一帆风顺。欧洲绿色交易(EGD)优先考虑绿色途径,但在应对温室气体(GHGs)方面还远远不够。本研究利用马尔奎斯特-伦伯格生产率指数(MLPI)来估算欧盟(EU)全要素生产率(TFP)的进步情况。本研究使用了 1995 年至 2019 年的面板数据,此外还对 1995 - 1996 年和 2018 - 2019 年两个时期进行了比较,这将提供有关欧洲动荡时期全要素生产率进步或衰退的重要信息。我们采用了两种 MLPI 模型,一种只利用不可再生能源(NRES),另一种则采用可再生能源(RES)。其中包括投入:发电量、劳动力和固定资本形成总额(GFCF);理想产出:国内生产总值;不良产出:二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4)。平均生产率有所提高,更具体地说,非可再生能源和可再生能源的 MLPI 平均生产率分别为 2.14% 和 7.34%,这意味着采用可再生能源可使生产率提高近三倍。这项新颖的分析可通过衡量全要素生产率为政策制定者提供有用的实用信息,从而有效地实现和达到碳中和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信