Highlighting Educational Gaps in Hairstyling Practices amongst Dermatologists and Trainees

Erinolaoluwa Araoye, Taylor Jamerson, Lu Yin, Kristen Lo Sicco, Crystal Aguh
{"title":"Highlighting Educational Gaps in Hairstyling Practices amongst Dermatologists and Trainees","authors":"Erinolaoluwa Araoye, Taylor Jamerson, Lu Yin, Kristen Lo Sicco, Crystal Aguh","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.27.24304771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Hairstyling practices are associated with the development and/or exacerbation of various forms of alopecia. Exposure to various hairstyling practices ranges but is often insufficient in current dermatologic textbooks and training curricula. We therefore conducted a survey to establish dermatologists understanding of hairstyling practices, particularly those that have been implicated in alopecia. Methods: A 34-item anonymous, electronic survey was distributed by email to 291 board-certified dermatologists and dermatology residents across the US between August 2020 and February 2021. Responses were rated on a 10-point scale to identify physician confidence in various styling practices\nResults: Black providers were more confident in both the knowledge and counseling of all hair practices (chemical straightening, heat styling, braiding, weaving, and wigs) compared to non-Black providers (p <0.001), with the exception of counseling patients on hair dyes for which no significant difference was found (p=0.337). Female providers were only more likely to indicate confidence in knowledge regarding different heat styling methods and hair dyes, and counseling of heat styling methods compared to male providers (OR 15.72, p<0.001; OR 2.47, p=0.022; OR 3.78, p=0.001 respectively) across all hair practices surveyed. Overall, 63.8% of providers reported that the majority of their knowledge on hair practices was from personal experience as opposed to formal training. Limitations: This survey is limited by its response rate and the inability to characterize non-responders due to anonymity. Conclusion: Our study highlights educational gaps in dermatologic training on hair practices, especially those more common among Black patients. Interestingly, the majority of provider knowledge came from personal experience rather than dermatologic training emphasizing the need for formalized curricula to enhance understanding among all dermatology providers.","PeriodicalId":501385,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Dermatology","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.24304771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Hairstyling practices are associated with the development and/or exacerbation of various forms of alopecia. Exposure to various hairstyling practices ranges but is often insufficient in current dermatologic textbooks and training curricula. We therefore conducted a survey to establish dermatologists understanding of hairstyling practices, particularly those that have been implicated in alopecia. Methods: A 34-item anonymous, electronic survey was distributed by email to 291 board-certified dermatologists and dermatology residents across the US between August 2020 and February 2021. Responses were rated on a 10-point scale to identify physician confidence in various styling practices Results: Black providers were more confident in both the knowledge and counseling of all hair practices (chemical straightening, heat styling, braiding, weaving, and wigs) compared to non-Black providers (p <0.001), with the exception of counseling patients on hair dyes for which no significant difference was found (p=0.337). Female providers were only more likely to indicate confidence in knowledge regarding different heat styling methods and hair dyes, and counseling of heat styling methods compared to male providers (OR 15.72, p<0.001; OR 2.47, p=0.022; OR 3.78, p=0.001 respectively) across all hair practices surveyed. Overall, 63.8% of providers reported that the majority of their knowledge on hair practices was from personal experience as opposed to formal training. Limitations: This survey is limited by its response rate and the inability to characterize non-responders due to anonymity. Conclusion: Our study highlights educational gaps in dermatologic training on hair practices, especially those more common among Black patients. Interestingly, the majority of provider knowledge came from personal experience rather than dermatologic training emphasizing the need for formalized curricula to enhance understanding among all dermatology providers.
突显皮肤科医生和受训人员在发型设计实践方面的教育差距
背景发型设计与各种脱发的发生和/或加重有关。目前的皮肤科教科书和培训课程中对各种发型设计方法的介绍并不多。因此,我们进行了一项调查,以了解皮肤科医生对发型设计方法的理解,尤其是那些与脱发有关联的方法。调查方法在 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月期间,我们通过电子邮件向全美 291 名经委员会认证的皮肤科医生和皮肤科住院医师发放了一份包含 34 个项目的匿名电子调查问卷。调查以 10 分制评分,以确定医生对各种造型实践的信心:与非黑人医疗人员相比,黑人医疗人员在所有头发护理方法(化学拉直、热定型、编辫子、编织和假发)的知识和咨询方面都更有信心(p<0.001),但在向患者提供染发咨询方面没有发现显著差异(p=0.337)。在所有接受调查的美发机构中,女性美发师仅比男性美发师更有可能表示对不同热定型方法和染发剂的知识以及热定型方法咨询有信心(OR 15.72,p<0.001;OR 2.47,p=0.022;OR 3.78,p=0.001)。总体而言,63.8%的医疗服务提供者表示,他们对美发方法的了解大多来自个人经验,而非正规培训。局限性:这项调查的局限性在于其回复率,以及由于匿名而无法描述未回复者的特征。结论:我们的研究凸显了皮肤科培训在毛发护理方面存在的教育差距,尤其是那些在黑人患者中更为常见的毛发护理。有趣的是,大多数提供者的知识来自于个人经验,而不是皮肤科培训,这强调了正规课程的必要性,以提高所有皮肤科提供者的理解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信