Lessons learned from eDNA adoption in the management of bigheaded carps in Chicago IL USA Area Waterways

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Environmental DNA Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1002/edn3.528
David M. Lodge
{"title":"Lessons learned from eDNA adoption in the management of bigheaded carps in Chicago IL USA Area Waterways","authors":"David M. Lodge","doi":"10.1002/edn3.528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) connects the Great Lakes watershed with the Mississippi watershed via canals that withdraw water from Lake Michigan. From 2009 through 2011, collaborators and I provided research, development, and application of eDNA to invasive species management in the CAWS in cooperation with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The research team's approach was a high-stakes test of a novel combination of proven technologies (field sampling techniques and laboratory genetics). In the first application of eDNA to a large scale, urgent management goal, we quickly discovered eDNA of two species of bigheaded carps in parts of the waterway where traditional tools had not captured fish. The central research question was whether the sensitivity (probability of detecting a fish when it was present) of eDNA was higher than that of traditional fish sampling tools (e.g., nets, electrofishing). The effort was part of what became a very large, complex, on-going initiative to reduce access by invasive species to Lake Michigan. This immediately garnered much attention, initiating a dialog about the reliability of eDNA, public discussion about the benefits and costs of the CAWS, and skepticism from industries that use the CAWS. Government agencies formed the Asian Carp Rapid Response Workgroup, which eventually became the Invasive Carp Regional Coordinating Committee (ICRCC). The ICRCC continues its coordinating role on the use of eDNA and other management responses in the CAWS. With the benefit of hindsight, I draw several lessons from the experience that may help in other settings where eDNA is now being deployed with increasing confidence and acceptance; evaluate the on-going CAWS surveillance and management effort; and recommend strengthening the current approach by broadening and deepening participation in a collaborative governance approach. Stronger public-private partnerships would accelerate research, development, commercialization, and application of eDNA analysis to the benefit of society.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.528","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Chicago Area Waterway System (CAWS) connects the Great Lakes watershed with the Mississippi watershed via canals that withdraw water from Lake Michigan. From 2009 through 2011, collaborators and I provided research, development, and application of eDNA to invasive species management in the CAWS in cooperation with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The research team's approach was a high-stakes test of a novel combination of proven technologies (field sampling techniques and laboratory genetics). In the first application of eDNA to a large scale, urgent management goal, we quickly discovered eDNA of two species of bigheaded carps in parts of the waterway where traditional tools had not captured fish. The central research question was whether the sensitivity (probability of detecting a fish when it was present) of eDNA was higher than that of traditional fish sampling tools (e.g., nets, electrofishing). The effort was part of what became a very large, complex, on-going initiative to reduce access by invasive species to Lake Michigan. This immediately garnered much attention, initiating a dialog about the reliability of eDNA, public discussion about the benefits and costs of the CAWS, and skepticism from industries that use the CAWS. Government agencies formed the Asian Carp Rapid Response Workgroup, which eventually became the Invasive Carp Regional Coordinating Committee (ICRCC). The ICRCC continues its coordinating role on the use of eDNA and other management responses in the CAWS. With the benefit of hindsight, I draw several lessons from the experience that may help in other settings where eDNA is now being deployed with increasing confidence and acceptance; evaluate the on-going CAWS surveillance and management effort; and recommend strengthening the current approach by broadening and deepening participation in a collaborative governance approach. Stronger public-private partnerships would accelerate research, development, commercialization, and application of eDNA analysis to the benefit of society.

Abstract Image

美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥地区水道采用 eDNA 管理大头鲤鱼的经验教训
芝加哥地区水道系统(CAWS)通过从密歇根湖取水的运河将五大湖流域与密西西比流域连接起来。从 2009 年到 2011 年,我和合作者与美国陆军工程兵部队 (USACE) 合作,在芝加哥地区水道系统的入侵物种管理中研究、开发和应用了 eDNA。研究团队的方法是对成熟技术(野外采样技术和实验室遗传学)的新颖组合进行高风险测试。在首次将 eDNA 应用于大规模紧急管理目标的过程中,我们很快就在传统工具无法捕获鱼类的水道部分发现了两种大头鲤的 eDNA。研究的核心问题是,eDNA 的灵敏度(发现鱼类的概率)是否高于传统的鱼类采样工具(如网、电鱼)。这项工作是为减少入侵物种进入密歇根湖而开展的一项大型、复杂、持续性行动的一部分。这立即引起了广泛关注,引发了关于 eDNA 可靠性的对话、公众对 CAWS 收益和成本的讨论以及使用 CAWS 的行业的怀疑。政府机构成立了亚洲鲤鱼快速反应工作组,该工作组最终成为入侵鲤鱼区域协调委员会(ICRCC)。ICRCC 继续在 CAWS 使用 eDNA 和其他管理对策方面发挥协调作用。事后看来,我从这次经历中汲取了一些经验教训,这些经验教训可能有助于在其他环境中使用 eDNA,因为在这些环境中使用 eDNA 的信心和接受度正在不断提高;我还对 CAWS 正在进行的监测和管理工作进行了评估;我建议通过扩大和深化参与合作治理方法来加强当前的方法。加强公私合作伙伴关系将加速 eDNA 分析的研究、开发、商业化和应用,从而造福社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信