Assessing mouse, trackball, touchscreen and leap motion in ship vibration conditions: A comparison of task performance, upper limb muscle activity and perceived fatigue and usability

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Yu Tian , Yue Shi , Yuzhuo Wu , Wenhao He , Shuang Liu , Da Tao
{"title":"Assessing mouse, trackball, touchscreen and leap motion in ship vibration conditions: A comparison of task performance, upper limb muscle activity and perceived fatigue and usability","authors":"Yu Tian ,&nbsp;Yue Shi ,&nbsp;Yuzhuo Wu ,&nbsp;Wenhao He ,&nbsp;Shuang Liu ,&nbsp;Da Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A variety of interaction devices are increasingly used for human-computer interaction (HCI) tasks in ship vibration conditions, but have seldom been well assessed. This study aimed to examine task performance, upper limb muscle activity, and perceived fatigue and device usability for four typical interaction devices (i.e., mouse, trackball, touchscreen, and Leap Motion) under simulated ship vibration conditions. A two-factor within-subjects design was employed in this study, where participants performed basic HCI tasks with the four interaction devices under three conditions (i.e., static condition, and low and high vibration conditions). The results showed that vibration condition significantly reduced task performance, especially for Leap Motion. Differences in task performance, upper arm and shoulder muscle activities, perceived fatigue and device usability were found among interaction devices. Mouse and touchscreen achieved the best task performance, compared with trackball and Leap Motion, while both touchscreen and Leap Motion achieved larger upper limb muscle activities, compared with trackball and mouse.</p></div><div><h3>Relevance to industry</h3><p>The findings provide important implications for the use and configuration of interaction devices, and for the development of prevention interventions for risks of musculoskeletal disorders in using interaction devices under ship vibration conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 103585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of interaction devices are increasingly used for human-computer interaction (HCI) tasks in ship vibration conditions, but have seldom been well assessed. This study aimed to examine task performance, upper limb muscle activity, and perceived fatigue and device usability for four typical interaction devices (i.e., mouse, trackball, touchscreen, and Leap Motion) under simulated ship vibration conditions. A two-factor within-subjects design was employed in this study, where participants performed basic HCI tasks with the four interaction devices under three conditions (i.e., static condition, and low and high vibration conditions). The results showed that vibration condition significantly reduced task performance, especially for Leap Motion. Differences in task performance, upper arm and shoulder muscle activities, perceived fatigue and device usability were found among interaction devices. Mouse and touchscreen achieved the best task performance, compared with trackball and Leap Motion, while both touchscreen and Leap Motion achieved larger upper limb muscle activities, compared with trackball and mouse.

Relevance to industry

The findings provide important implications for the use and configuration of interaction devices, and for the development of prevention interventions for risks of musculoskeletal disorders in using interaction devices under ship vibration conditions.

评估船舶振动条件下的鼠标、轨迹球、触摸屏和跳跃运动:任务性能、上肢肌肉活动以及疲劳感和可用性比较
各种交互设备正越来越多地用于船舶振动条件下的人机交互(HCI)任务,但很少有人对其进行过良好的评估。本研究旨在考察四种典型交互设备(即鼠标、轨迹球、触摸屏和 Leap Motion)在模拟船舶振动条件下的任务表现、上肢肌肉活动、疲劳感和设备可用性。本研究采用了双因素受试者内设计,受试者在三种条件下(即静态条件、低振动条件和高振动条件)使用四种交互设备执行基本的人机交互任务。结果表明,振动条件明显降低了任务表现,尤其是 Leap Motion。不同交互设备在任务表现、上臂和肩部肌肉活动、疲劳感和设备可用性方面存在差异。鼠标和触摸屏与轨迹球和 Leap Motion 相比,任务表现最好,而触摸屏和 Leap Motion 与轨迹球和鼠标相比,上肢肌肉活动量更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信