Multi-strategy improved artificial rabbit optimization algorithm based on fusion centroid and elite guidance mechanisms

IF 7.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hefan Huang , Rui Wu , Haisong Huang , Jianan Wei , Zhenggong Han , Long Wen , Yage Yuan
{"title":"Multi-strategy improved artificial rabbit optimization algorithm based on fusion centroid and elite guidance mechanisms","authors":"Hefan Huang ,&nbsp;Rui Wu ,&nbsp;Haisong Huang ,&nbsp;Jianan Wei ,&nbsp;Zhenggong Han ,&nbsp;Long Wen ,&nbsp;Yage Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.cma.2024.116915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Artificial Rabbit Optimization (ARO) algorithm has been proposed as an effective metaheuristic optimization approach in recent years. However, the ARO algorithm exhibits shortcomings in certain cases, including inefficient search, slow convergence, and vulnerability to local optima. To address these issues, this paper introduces a multi-strategy improved Artificial Rabbit Optimization (IARO) algorithm. Firstly, in the enhanced search strategy, we propose integrating the centroid guidance mechanism and elite guidance mechanism with the greedy strategy to update the position during the exploration phase. Additionally, the Levy flight strategy integrated with self-learning, is employed to update the position during the development phase to improve convergence speed and prevent falling into local optima. Secondly, the algorithm incorporates a per-dimension mirror boundary control strategy to map individuals exceeding the boundary back within the boundary back inside the boundary. This boundary control strategy ensures the algorithm operates within bounds and enhances convergence speed. Finally, within the survival of the fittest strategy, an adaptive factor is introduced to gradually enhance the population's overall adaptability. This factor regulates the balance between exploration and exploitation, allowing the algorithm to fully explore the search space and improve its robustness. To substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed IARO algorithm, a rigorous and systematic verification analysis was undertaken. Comparative experiments for qualitative and quantitative analysis were conducted on three benchmark test sets, namely CEC2017, CEC2020, and CEC2022. The analysis results, including the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, consistently demonstrates that this improved algorithm outperforms ARO and other state-of-the-art optimization algorithms comprehensively. Finally, the feasibility of the IARO algorithm has been verified in seven classical constrained engineering problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55222,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","volume":"425 ","pages":"Article 116915"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782524001713","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Artificial Rabbit Optimization (ARO) algorithm has been proposed as an effective metaheuristic optimization approach in recent years. However, the ARO algorithm exhibits shortcomings in certain cases, including inefficient search, slow convergence, and vulnerability to local optima. To address these issues, this paper introduces a multi-strategy improved Artificial Rabbit Optimization (IARO) algorithm. Firstly, in the enhanced search strategy, we propose integrating the centroid guidance mechanism and elite guidance mechanism with the greedy strategy to update the position during the exploration phase. Additionally, the Levy flight strategy integrated with self-learning, is employed to update the position during the development phase to improve convergence speed and prevent falling into local optima. Secondly, the algorithm incorporates a per-dimension mirror boundary control strategy to map individuals exceeding the boundary back within the boundary back inside the boundary. This boundary control strategy ensures the algorithm operates within bounds and enhances convergence speed. Finally, within the survival of the fittest strategy, an adaptive factor is introduced to gradually enhance the population's overall adaptability. This factor regulates the balance between exploration and exploitation, allowing the algorithm to fully explore the search space and improve its robustness. To substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed IARO algorithm, a rigorous and systematic verification analysis was undertaken. Comparative experiments for qualitative and quantitative analysis were conducted on three benchmark test sets, namely CEC2017, CEC2020, and CEC2022. The analysis results, including the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, consistently demonstrates that this improved algorithm outperforms ARO and other state-of-the-art optimization algorithms comprehensively. Finally, the feasibility of the IARO algorithm has been verified in seven classical constrained engineering problems.

Abstract Image

基于融合中心点和精英引导机制的多策略改进型人工兔优化算法
人工兔优化算法(ARO)是近年来提出的一种有效的元启发式优化方法。然而,ARO 算法在某些情况下表现出搜索效率低、收敛速度慢、易出现局部最优等缺点。针对这些问题,本文介绍了一种多策略改进型人工兔优化算法(IARO)。首先,在增强搜索策略中,我们提出将中心点引导机制和精英引导机制与贪婪策略相结合,在探索阶段更新位置。此外,还采用了与自学习相结合的列维飞行策略来更新开发阶段的位置,以提高收敛速度并防止陷入局部最优。其次,该算法采用了每维度镜像边界控制策略,将超出边界的个体映射回边界内。这种边界控制策略可确保算法在边界内运行,并提高收敛速度。最后,在适者生存策略中,引入了一个适应性因子,以逐步增强种群的整体适应性。该因子调节探索与开发之间的平衡,使算法能够充分探索搜索空间,并提高其鲁棒性。为了证实所提出的 IARO 算法的有效性,我们进行了严格而系统的验证分析。在三个基准测试集(即 CEC2017、CEC2020 和 CEC2022)上进行了定性和定量分析的对比实验。包括 Wilcoxon 秩和检验在内的分析结果一致表明,该改进算法全面优于 ARO 和其他最先进的优化算法。最后,IARO 算法的可行性在七个经典受限工程问题中得到了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
15.30%
发文量
719
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering stands as a cornerstone in the realm of computational science and engineering. With a history spanning over five decades, the journal has been a key platform for disseminating papers on advanced mathematical modeling and numerical solutions. Interdisciplinary in nature, these contributions encompass mechanics, mathematics, computer science, and various scientific disciplines. The journal welcomes a broad range of computational methods addressing the simulation, analysis, and design of complex physical problems, making it a vital resource for researchers in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信