A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Pap Testing in Women with Disabilities and Serious Mental Illnesses: Thirty Years After the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Michele Sky Lee, Jillian R Peart, Julie S Armin, Heather J Williamson
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators to Pap Testing in Women with Disabilities and Serious Mental Illnesses: Thirty Years After the Americans with Disabilities Act.","authors":"Michele Sky Lee, Jillian R Peart, Julie S Armin, Heather J Williamson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thirty years after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed, promising equal access to health services for people with disabilities and serious mental illness, research on Pap testing continues to uncover health disparities among women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses, including those that identify as an ethnic/racial minority.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to describe and present the literature on the barriers and facilitators women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test using the social ecological model. We also examined the degree to which racial/ethnic minority women were included in these articles.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review was conducted where the research team searched United States academic literature from 1990 through February 2020 in PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL using general subject headings for disability, mental illness, and Pap testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria. More barriers than facilitators were mentioned in articles. Barriers and facilitators are organized into three groups according to social ecological model and include individual (e.g., socioeconomic status, anxiety, education), interpersonal (e.g., family, living environment), and organizational factors (health care provider training, health care system). Participant's race/ethnicity were often reported but minoritized populations were often not the focus of articles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More articles discussed the difficulties that women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test than facilitators to Pap testing. Additional research should focus on the intersectionality race/ethnicity and women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses in relation to Pap testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94083,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10978025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health disparities research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thirty years after the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was passed, promising equal access to health services for people with disabilities and serious mental illness, research on Pap testing continues to uncover health disparities among women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses, including those that identify as an ethnic/racial minority.

Aim: The purpose of this paper is to describe and present the literature on the barriers and facilitators women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test using the social ecological model. We also examined the degree to which racial/ethnic minority women were included in these articles.

Method: A scoping review was conducted where the research team searched United States academic literature from 1990 through February 2020 in PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL using general subject headings for disability, mental illness, and Pap testing.

Results: Thirty-two articles met inclusion criteria. More barriers than facilitators were mentioned in articles. Barriers and facilitators are organized into three groups according to social ecological model and include individual (e.g., socioeconomic status, anxiety, education), interpersonal (e.g., family, living environment), and organizational factors (health care provider training, health care system). Participant's race/ethnicity were often reported but minoritized populations were often not the focus of articles.

Conclusions: More articles discussed the difficulties that women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses face with receiving a Pap test than facilitators to Pap testing. Additional research should focus on the intersectionality race/ethnicity and women with disabilities and women with serious mental illnesses in relation to Pap testing.

残疾妇女和患有严重精神疾病的妇女接受子宫颈抹片检查的障碍和促进因素范围综述》(A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilators to Pap Testing in Women with Disabilities and Serious Mental Illnesses:美国残疾人法案》颁布三十年后。
背景:美国残疾人法案》(Americans with Disabilities Act,ADA)的通过承诺了残疾人和患有严重精神疾病的人可以平等地获得医疗服务,而在该法案通过 30 年之后,有关子宫颈抹片检查的研究仍在继续揭示残疾妇女和患有严重精神疾病的妇女(包括那些被认定为少数种族/少数族裔的妇女)之间的健康差异。我们还研究了这些文章在多大程度上纳入了少数种族/族裔妇女:研究小组使用残疾、精神疾病和子宫颈抹片检查等一般主题词,在 PubMed、Medline 和 CINAHL 中检索了 1990 年至 2020 年 2 月期间的美国学术文献,并进行了范围审查:有 32 篇文章符合纳入标准。文章中提到的障碍多于促进因素。根据社会生态模型,障碍和促进因素分为三组,包括个人因素(如社会经济地位、焦虑、教育)、人际因素(如家庭、生活环境)和组织因素(医疗服务提供者培训、医疗保健系统)。文章经常报道参与者的种族/民族,但少数群体往往不是文章的重点:更多的文章讨论了残疾妇女和患有严重精神疾病的妇女在接受子宫颈抹片检查时所面临的困难,而不是促进子宫颈抹片检查的因素。更多的研究应关注种族/民族、残疾妇女和患有严重精神疾病的妇女在接受子宫颈抹片检查时的交叉性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信