Impaired Whole-Blood Fibrinolysis is a Predictor of Mortality in Intensive Care Patients.

TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2270-7673
Julie S Brewer, Christine L Hvas, Anne-Mette Hvas, Julie B Larsen
{"title":"Impaired Whole-Blood Fibrinolysis is a Predictor of Mortality in Intensive Care Patients.","authors":"Julie S Brewer, Christine L Hvas, Anne-Mette Hvas, Julie B Larsen","doi":"10.1055/a-2270-7673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Altered fibrinolysis is considered to play a crucial role in the development of coagulopathy in sepsis. However, routine laboratory tests for fibrinolysis are currently very limited, and the impact of fibrinolytic capacity on clinical outcome is poorly investigated. <b>Objectives</b>  To assess whole-blood fibrinolysis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and compare fibrinolysis in sepsis patients with nonsepsis patients. Further, to investigate associations between fibrinolytic capacity and 30-day mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE). <b>Methods</b>  This study was designed as a prospective cohort study. Adult ICU patients were included at the Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. All patients had a blood sample obtained the morning after admission. A modified thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) analysis with tissue plasminogen activator (ROTEM®-tPA) was used to assess fibrinolysis. The primary endpoint was difference in ROTEM®-tPA lysis time between sepsis patients and nonsepsis patients. <b>Results</b>  ROTEM®-tPA revealed fibrinolytic impairment in sepsis patients ( <i>n</i>  = 30) compared with nonsepsis ICU controls ( <i>n</i>  = 129), with longer lysis time (median [interquartile range] 3,600 [3,352-3,600] vs. 3,374 seconds [2,175-3,600], <i>p</i>  < 0.01), lower maximum lysis (23 [8-90] vs. 94% [14-100], <i>p</i>  = 0.02), and lower fibrinolysis speed (0.41 [0.0-1.4] vs. 1.6 mm/min [0.1-2.7], <i>p</i>  = 0.01). In the composite ICU population, 61% (97/159) demonstrated prolonged lysis time indicating impaired fibrinolytic capacity. These patients had higher 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.26 [0.83-6.69]) and VTE risk (OR: 3.84 [0.87-17.8]) than patients with normal lysis time. <b>Conclusion</b>  Sepsis patients showed impaired fibrinolysis measured with ROTEM®-tPA compared with nonsepsis patients and ROTEM®-tPA lysis time was associated with 30-day mortality and VTE in the entire ICU cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":"8 1","pages":"e164-e174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10978095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2270-7673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Altered fibrinolysis is considered to play a crucial role in the development of coagulopathy in sepsis. However, routine laboratory tests for fibrinolysis are currently very limited, and the impact of fibrinolytic capacity on clinical outcome is poorly investigated. Objectives  To assess whole-blood fibrinolysis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and compare fibrinolysis in sepsis patients with nonsepsis patients. Further, to investigate associations between fibrinolytic capacity and 30-day mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  This study was designed as a prospective cohort study. Adult ICU patients were included at the Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. All patients had a blood sample obtained the morning after admission. A modified thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) analysis with tissue plasminogen activator (ROTEM®-tPA) was used to assess fibrinolysis. The primary endpoint was difference in ROTEM®-tPA lysis time between sepsis patients and nonsepsis patients. Results  ROTEM®-tPA revealed fibrinolytic impairment in sepsis patients ( n  = 30) compared with nonsepsis ICU controls ( n  = 129), with longer lysis time (median [interquartile range] 3,600 [3,352-3,600] vs. 3,374 seconds [2,175-3,600], p  < 0.01), lower maximum lysis (23 [8-90] vs. 94% [14-100], p  = 0.02), and lower fibrinolysis speed (0.41 [0.0-1.4] vs. 1.6 mm/min [0.1-2.7], p  = 0.01). In the composite ICU population, 61% (97/159) demonstrated prolonged lysis time indicating impaired fibrinolytic capacity. These patients had higher 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.26 [0.83-6.69]) and VTE risk (OR: 3.84 [0.87-17.8]) than patients with normal lysis time. Conclusion  Sepsis patients showed impaired fibrinolysis measured with ROTEM®-tPA compared with nonsepsis patients and ROTEM®-tPA lysis time was associated with 30-day mortality and VTE in the entire ICU cohort.

全血纤维蛋白溶解功能受损是重症监护患者死亡率的预测因素之一
背景纤溶改变被认为在脓毒症凝血病的发展中起着至关重要的作用。然而,目前常规的纤溶实验室检测非常有限,而且纤溶能力对临床结果的影响也鲜有研究。目的 评估重症监护室(ICU)住院患者的全血纤维蛋白溶解情况,并比较败血症患者和非败血症患者的纤维蛋白溶解情况。此外,研究纤溶能力与 30 天死亡率和静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)之间的关系。方法 本研究为前瞻性队列研究。研究对象包括丹麦奥胡斯大学医院的成人重症监护病房患者。所有患者都在入院后的第二天早上采集了血液样本。使用改良血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM®)和组织纤溶酶原激活剂(ROTEM®-tPA)分析评估纤溶情况。主要终点是脓毒症患者与非脓毒症患者的 ROTEM®-tPA 溶解时间差异。结果 ROTEM®-tPA 发现败血症患者(n = 30)与非败血症 ICU 对照组(n = 129)相比存在纤溶障碍,溶解时间更长(中位数[四分位数范围] 3,600 [3,352-3,600] vs. 中位数[四分位数范围] 3,374 秒[2,240])。3,374 秒 [2,175-3,600],P = 0.02),纤溶速度较低(0.41 [0.0-1.4] vs. 1.6 mm/min [0.1-2.7],P = 0.01)。在综合重症监护室人群中,61%(97/159)的患者溶解时间延长,表明纤溶能力受损。与溶解时间正常的患者相比,这些患者的 30 天死亡率(调整赔率比 [OR]:2.26 [0.83-6.69])和 VTE 风险(OR:3.84 [0.87-17.8])更高。结论 与非败血症患者相比,使用 ROTEM®-tPA 测量的败血症患者纤溶功能受损,在整个 ICU 队列中,ROTEM®-tPA 溶解时间与 30 天死亡率和 VTE 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信