Interventions Used in Practice to Reduce Prejudice and Stereotypes Toward Lesbian and Gay People: Theory Based Evaluation.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2024.2331275
Hanneke Felten, Saskia Keuzenkamp, John de Wit
{"title":"Interventions Used in Practice to Reduce Prejudice and Stereotypes Toward Lesbian and Gay People: Theory Based Evaluation.","authors":"Hanneke Felten, Saskia Keuzenkamp, John de Wit","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2024.2331275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various interventions are used in practice to reduce prejudice against lesbian women and gay men. Often these have not been developed or evaluated for effectiveness by researchers. In this study, we used theory-based evaluation (TBE) to determine whether the assumptions underlying three types of interventions (knowledge interventions, guessing games, and theater and movie interventions) often used in practice in the Netherlands are in line with evidence from the scientific literature. As a first step, we consulted the developers of prominent examples of the three types of interventions on their assumptions about why their interventions would work to construct a theory of change for each type of intervention. Next, we undertook a review of the literature to assess whether these theories of change were supported by theory and research. We found that of the three theories of change (ToC) guiding the three types of interventions often used in the Netherlands, only one was supported. These findings can guide developers of interventions to reduce prejudice and stereotypes toward LGBT people in practice in deciding which type of intervention is best to develop. We recommend that researchers and practitioners cooperate more closely on intervention development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1124-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2331275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various interventions are used in practice to reduce prejudice against lesbian women and gay men. Often these have not been developed or evaluated for effectiveness by researchers. In this study, we used theory-based evaluation (TBE) to determine whether the assumptions underlying three types of interventions (knowledge interventions, guessing games, and theater and movie interventions) often used in practice in the Netherlands are in line with evidence from the scientific literature. As a first step, we consulted the developers of prominent examples of the three types of interventions on their assumptions about why their interventions would work to construct a theory of change for each type of intervention. Next, we undertook a review of the literature to assess whether these theories of change were supported by theory and research. We found that of the three theories of change (ToC) guiding the three types of interventions often used in the Netherlands, only one was supported. These findings can guide developers of interventions to reduce prejudice and stereotypes toward LGBT people in practice in deciding which type of intervention is best to develop. We recommend that researchers and practitioners cooperate more closely on intervention development.

为减少对男女同性恋者的偏见和成见而在实践中采取的干预措施:基于理论的评估。
为减少对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的偏见,在实践中采取了各种干预措施。这些干预措施通常未经研究人员开发或评估其有效性。在这项研究中,我们采用了基于理论的评估(TBE)方法,以确定荷兰在实践中经常使用的三类干预措施(知识干预、猜谜游戏以及戏剧和电影干预)所依据的假设是否与科学文献中的证据相符。首先,我们咨询了这三类干预措施中著名案例的开发者,了解他们对其干预措施为何有效的假设,从而为每一类干预措施构建一个变革理论。接下来,我们对文献进行了审查,以评估这些变革理论是否得到理论和研究的支持。我们发现,在指导荷兰常用的三类干预措施的三个变革理论(ToC)中,只有一个得到了支持。这些发现可以指导干预措施的开发者在实践中减少对男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的偏见和成见,从而决定开发哪种类型的干预措施最好。我们建议研究人员和从业人员在干预措施的开发方面加强合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信