Using the Electronic Medical Record to Address Code Status Documentation: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal for Healthcare Quality Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000428
John Sorge, Susan Szpunar, Theodore Daniel, Louis Saravolatz
{"title":"Using the Electronic Medical Record to Address Code Status Documentation: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"John Sorge, Susan Szpunar, Theodore Daniel, Louis Saravolatz","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Code status (CS) is often overlooked while admitting patients to the hospital. This is important for patients with end-stage disease. This quality improvement project investigated whether a CS pop-up alert in the electronic medical record, combined with provider education, improved addressing CS. The project consisted of a baseline chart review, implementation of the alert and physician education, and a postintervention chart review. We reviewed 1828 charts at baseline and 1,775 at postintervention. From univariable analysis, there were improvements in addressing CS, being full code, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, use of vasopressors, and cardioversion technique categories (all p < .001). Documentation of do not resuscitate did not change. From logistic regression, after controlling for age, race, end-stage liver disease, stroke, cancer, hospital unit, and sepsis, patients in the postintervention period were two times more likely to have CS addressed (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04, p < .001). There was a significant improvement in CS documentation from our interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Code status (CS) is often overlooked while admitting patients to the hospital. This is important for patients with end-stage disease. This quality improvement project investigated whether a CS pop-up alert in the electronic medical record, combined with provider education, improved addressing CS. The project consisted of a baseline chart review, implementation of the alert and physician education, and a postintervention chart review. We reviewed 1828 charts at baseline and 1,775 at postintervention. From univariable analysis, there were improvements in addressing CS, being full code, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intubation, use of vasopressors, and cardioversion technique categories (all p < .001). Documentation of do not resuscitate did not change. From logistic regression, after controlling for age, race, end-stage liver disease, stroke, cancer, hospital unit, and sepsis, patients in the postintervention period were two times more likely to have CS addressed (odds ratio [OR] = 2.04, p < .001). There was a significant improvement in CS documentation from our interventions.

使用电子病历处理代码状态文档:质量改进项目。
摘要:病人入院时的代码状态(CS)经常被忽视。这对于终末期疾病患者来说非常重要。该质量改进项目调查了电子病历中的代码状态弹出提示与医疗服务提供者教育相结合是否能改善代码状态的处理。该项目包括基线病历审查、警报和医生教育的实施以及干预后的病历审查。我们对 1828 份病历进行了基线审查,对 1775 份病历进行了干预后审查。通过单变量分析发现,在处理 CS、完全代码、心肺复苏、插管、使用血管加压剂和心脏复苏技术类别方面均有所改进(所有 p < .001)。不进行复苏的记录没有变化。根据逻辑回归结果,在控制了年龄、种族、终末期肝病、中风、癌症、住院单位和脓毒症等因素后,干预后的患者处理 CS 的可能性增加了两倍(几率比 [OR] = 2.04,P < .001)。通过我们的干预,CS 记录有了明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信