The effect of intravenous hyoscine butylbromide on slow progress in labor (BUSCLAB): A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004352
Lise Christine Gaudernack, Angeline Elisabeth Styve Einarsen, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Mirjam Lukasse, Nina Gunnes, Trond Melbye Michelsen
{"title":"The effect of intravenous hyoscine butylbromide on slow progress in labor (BUSCLAB): A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"Lise Christine Gaudernack, Angeline Elisabeth Styve Einarsen, Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Mirjam Lukasse, Nina Gunnes, Trond Melbye Michelsen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prolonged labor is a common condition associated with maternal and perinatal complications. The standard treatment with oxytocin for augmentation of labor increases the risk of adverse outcomes. Hyoscine butylbromide is a spasmolytic drug with few side effects shown to shorten labor when used in a general population of laboring women. However, research on its effect on preventing prolonged labor is lacking. We aimed to assess the effect of hyoscine butylbromide on the duration of labor in nulliparous women showing early signs of slow labor.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, we included 249 nulliparous women at term with 1 fetus in cephalic presentation and spontaneous start of labor, showing early signs of prolonged labor by crossing the alert line of the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph. The trial was conducted at Oslo University Hospital in Norway from May 2019 to December 2021. One hundred and twenty-five participants were randomized to receive 1 ml hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan) (20 mg/ml), while 124 received 1 ml sodium chloride intravenously. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was duration of labor from administration of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to vaginal delivery, which was analyzed by Weibull regression to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) of vaginal delivery between the 2 treatment groups, with associated 95% confidence interval (CI). A wide range of secondary maternal and perinatal outcomes were also evaluated. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Weibull regression, whereas continuous and dichotomous outcomes were analyzed by median regression and logistic regression, respectively. All main analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) set of eligible women with signed informed consent receiving either of the 2 treatments. The follow-up period lasted during the postpartum hospital stay. All personnel, participants, and researchers were blinded to the treatment allocation. Median (mean) labor duration from IMP administration to vaginal delivery was 401 (440.8) min in the hyoscine butylbromide group versus 432.5 (453.6) min in the placebo group. We found no statistically significant association between IMP and duration of labor from IMP administration to vaginal delivery: cause-specific HR of 1.00 (95% CI [0.77, 1.29]; p = 0.993). Among 255 randomized women having received 1 dose of IMP, 169 women (66.3%) reported a mild adverse event: 75.2% in the hyoscine butylbromide group and 57.1% in the placebo group (Pearson's chi-square test: p = 0.002). More than half of eligible women were not included in the study because they did not wish to participate or were not included upon admission. The participants might have represented a selected group of women reducing the external validity of the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One intravenous dose of 20 mg hyoscine butylbromide was not found to be superior to placebo in preventing slow labor progress in a population of first-time mothers at risk of prolonged labor. Further research is warranted to answer whether increased and/or repeated doses of hyoscine butylbromide might have an effect on duration of labor.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03961165) EudraCT (2018-002338-19).</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"21 3","pages":"e1004352"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11008832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prolonged labor is a common condition associated with maternal and perinatal complications. The standard treatment with oxytocin for augmentation of labor increases the risk of adverse outcomes. Hyoscine butylbromide is a spasmolytic drug with few side effects shown to shorten labor when used in a general population of laboring women. However, research on its effect on preventing prolonged labor is lacking. We aimed to assess the effect of hyoscine butylbromide on the duration of labor in nulliparous women showing early signs of slow labor.

Methods and findings: In this double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial, we included 249 nulliparous women at term with 1 fetus in cephalic presentation and spontaneous start of labor, showing early signs of prolonged labor by crossing the alert line of the World Health Organization (WHO) partograph. The trial was conducted at Oslo University Hospital in Norway from May 2019 to December 2021. One hundred and twenty-five participants were randomized to receive 1 ml hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan) (20 mg/ml), while 124 received 1 ml sodium chloride intravenously. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. The primary outcome was duration of labor from administration of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) to vaginal delivery, which was analyzed by Weibull regression to estimate the cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) of vaginal delivery between the 2 treatment groups, with associated 95% confidence interval (CI). A wide range of secondary maternal and perinatal outcomes were also evaluated. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed by Weibull regression, whereas continuous and dichotomous outcomes were analyzed by median regression and logistic regression, respectively. All main analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) set of eligible women with signed informed consent receiving either of the 2 treatments. The follow-up period lasted during the postpartum hospital stay. All personnel, participants, and researchers were blinded to the treatment allocation. Median (mean) labor duration from IMP administration to vaginal delivery was 401 (440.8) min in the hyoscine butylbromide group versus 432.5 (453.6) min in the placebo group. We found no statistically significant association between IMP and duration of labor from IMP administration to vaginal delivery: cause-specific HR of 1.00 (95% CI [0.77, 1.29]; p = 0.993). Among 255 randomized women having received 1 dose of IMP, 169 women (66.3%) reported a mild adverse event: 75.2% in the hyoscine butylbromide group and 57.1% in the placebo group (Pearson's chi-square test: p = 0.002). More than half of eligible women were not included in the study because they did not wish to participate or were not included upon admission. The participants might have represented a selected group of women reducing the external validity of the study.

Conclusions: One intravenous dose of 20 mg hyoscine butylbromide was not found to be superior to placebo in preventing slow labor progress in a population of first-time mothers at risk of prolonged labor. Further research is warranted to answer whether increased and/or repeated doses of hyoscine butylbromide might have an effect on duration of labor.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03961165) EudraCT (2018-002338-19).

静脉注射丁溴酸东莨菪碱对产程进展缓慢的影响(BUSCLAB):双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
背景:产程延长是一种常见病,与产妇和围产期并发症有关。使用催产素催产的标准治疗方法会增加不良后果的风险。丁溴酸东莨菪碱是一种副作用小的解痉药物,在一般产妇中使用可缩短产程。然而,目前还缺乏对其预防产程延长效果的研究。我们的目的是评估丁溴酸东莨菪碱对出现早期慢产迹象的无阴道产妇产程的影响:在这项双盲随机安慰剂对照试验中,我们纳入了 249 名有 1 个头位胎儿、自然分娩开始的足月无痛分娩产妇,她们的早期产程超过了世界卫生组织(WHO)分娩图的警戒线,显示出产程延长的迹象。试验于2019年5月至2021年12月在挪威奥斯陆大学医院进行。125名参与者被随机分配接受1毫升东莨菪碱丁溴化物(Buscopan)(20毫克/毫升),124名参与者接受1毫升氯化钠静脉注射。随机化由计算机生成,并通过不透明的按顺序编号的密封信封进行分配隐藏。主要结果为从服用研究用药(IMP)到阴道分娩的产程时间,通过Weibull回归分析,估算出两个治疗组之间阴道分娩的特定原因危险比(HR),以及相关的95%置信区间(CI)。此外,还对一系列次要的孕产妇和围产期结果进行了评估。时间到事件的结果通过 Weibull 回归进行分析,而连续和二分结果则分别通过中位回归和逻辑回归进行分析。所有主要分析均基于修改后的意向性治疗(ITT)组,即签署知情同意书并接受两种治疗方法中任何一种的符合条件的妇女。随访期为产后住院期间。所有人员、参与者和研究人员对治疗分配均为盲人。从服用 IMP 到阴道分娩的中位(平均)产程时间为:东莨菪碱丁溴化物组 401 (440.8) 分钟,安慰剂组 432.5 (453.6) 分钟。我们发现,从服用 IMP 到阴道分娩,IMP 与分娩持续时间之间没有统计学意义上的显著关联:特定原因 HR 为 1.00(95% CI [0.77, 1.29];P = 0.993)。在 255 名随机接受了 1 剂 IMP 的产妇中,有 169 名产妇(66.3%)报告了轻度不良事件:丁溴酸东莨菪碱组为 75.2%,安慰剂组为 57.1%(皮尔森卡方检验:P = 0.002)。半数以上符合条件的妇女未被纳入研究,原因是她们不愿参与或入院时未被纳入。这些参与者可能是经过挑选的妇女群体,从而降低了研究的外部有效性:结论:在有产程延长风险的初产妇群体中,静脉注射一剂 20 毫克丁溴酸东莨菪碱在预防产程进展缓慢方面的效果并不优于安慰剂。要回答增加和/或重复服用丁溴酸东莨菪碱是否会对产程产生影响,还需要进一步研究:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03961165) EudraCT (2018-002338-19)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信