Anatomy of the Lumbrical Muscles: Implications for Mechanical Advantage.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1177/15589447241235340
Kevin Kooi, Ingmar W F Legerstee, Eva van Vliet, Liliane A Freundt, Kristen Reikersdorfer, Neal C Chen, Kyle R Eberlin
{"title":"Anatomy of the Lumbrical Muscles: Implications for Mechanical Advantage.","authors":"Kevin Kooi, Ingmar W F Legerstee, Eva van Vliet, Liliane A Freundt, Kristen Reikersdorfer, Neal C Chen, Kyle R Eberlin","doi":"10.1177/15589447241235340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lumbrical muscles comprise 4 intrinsic muscles of the hand and are involved in flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and extension of the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical mechanics of the lumbrical muscles of the index, middle, ring, and small fingers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 25 cadaver arms and measured the distance between the MCPJ and fingertip, the distance between the MCPJ and lumbrical muscle insertion, and the distance between the MCPJ and the most proximal lumbrical muscle origin. With these measurements we calculated the needed force, insertion ratio (length of the proximal, middle, and distal phalanx divided by the MCPJ to insertion distance), and lumbrical muscle length.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the force was significantly different between all fingers, except for the comparison of the index and ring finger (<i>P</i> = .34). In addition, we found that muscle length was significantly different between most the fingers, except for the comparison between the index and middle fingers (<i>P</i> = .24), and index and ring fingers (<i>P</i> = .20). There was no significant difference in insertion ratio.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that the anatomical mechanics for the motor function of the lumbrical muscles are similar in all fingers. This could further imply that movements are equally precise in all fingers resulting in coordination with one another and, therefore, adequate hand function.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"1029-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241235340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lumbrical muscles comprise 4 intrinsic muscles of the hand and are involved in flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) and extension of the proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomical mechanics of the lumbrical muscles of the index, middle, ring, and small fingers.

Methods: We evaluated 25 cadaver arms and measured the distance between the MCPJ and fingertip, the distance between the MCPJ and lumbrical muscle insertion, and the distance between the MCPJ and the most proximal lumbrical muscle origin. With these measurements we calculated the needed force, insertion ratio (length of the proximal, middle, and distal phalanx divided by the MCPJ to insertion distance), and lumbrical muscle length.

Results: We found that the force was significantly different between all fingers, except for the comparison of the index and ring finger (P = .34). In addition, we found that muscle length was significantly different between most the fingers, except for the comparison between the index and middle fingers (P = .24), and index and ring fingers (P = .20). There was no significant difference in insertion ratio.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the anatomical mechanics for the motor function of the lumbrical muscles are similar in all fingers. This could further imply that movements are equally precise in all fingers resulting in coordination with one another and, therefore, adequate hand function.

Level of evidence: IV.

睫状肌解剖:对机械优势的影响。
背景:腰大肌由手部的 4 块固有肌肉组成,参与掌指关节 (MCPJ) 的屈曲以及近端指间关节和远端指间关节的伸展。本研究的目的是调查食指、中指、无名指和小指的腰肌的解剖力学:我们对 25 只尸体手臂进行了评估,并测量了 MCPJ 与指尖之间的距离、MCPJ 与拇指外侧肌肉插入点之间的距离以及 MCPJ 与拇指外侧肌肉最原点之间的距离。根据这些测量结果,我们计算了所需的力量、插入比(近、中、远端指骨的长度除以 MCPJ 到插入距离)和拇外肌长度:结果:我们发现,除了食指和无名指的比较(P = .34)外,所有手指之间的力量都存在明显差异。此外,我们还发现,除食指和中指(P = .24)以及食指和无名指(P = .20)之间的比较外,大多数手指之间的肌肉长度存在明显差异。插入比没有明显差异:我们的研究表明,所有手指的腰肌运动功能的解剖力学原理相似。结论:我们的研究表明,所有手指的腰肌运动功能解剖力学相似,这可能进一步意味着所有手指的运动都同样精确,从而相互协调,因此能充分发挥手部功能:证据等级:IV.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信