Hsien-Chih Chang, Jonathan Conroy, Hung Le, Lazar Milenkovic, Shay Solomon, Cuong Than
{"title":"Optimal Euclidean Tree Covers","authors":"Hsien-Chih Chang, Jonathan Conroy, Hung Le, Lazar Milenkovic, Shay Solomon, Cuong Than","doi":"arxiv-2403.17754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A $(1+\\varepsilon)\\textit{-stretch tree cover}$ of a metric space is a\ncollection of trees, where every pair of points has a $(1+\\varepsilon)$-stretch\npath in one of the trees. The celebrated $\\textit{Dumbbell Theorem}$ [Arya\net~al. STOC'95] states that any set of $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean\nspace admits a $(1+\\varepsilon)$-stretch tree cover with $O_d(\\varepsilon^{-d}\n\\cdot \\log(1/\\varepsilon))$ trees, where the $O_d$ notation suppresses terms\nthat depend solely on the dimension~$d$. The running time of their construction\nis $O_d(n \\log n \\cdot \\frac{\\log(1/\\varepsilon)}{\\varepsilon^{d}} + n \\cdot\n\\varepsilon^{-2d})$. Since the same point may occur in multiple levels of the\ntree, the $\\textit{maximum degree}$ of a point in the tree cover may be as\nlarge as $\\Omega(\\log \\Phi)$, where $\\Phi$ is the aspect ratio of the input\npoint set. In this work we present a $(1+\\varepsilon)$-stretch tree cover with\n$O_d(\\varepsilon^{-d+1} \\cdot \\log(1/\\varepsilon))$ trees, which is optimal (up\nto the $\\log(1/\\varepsilon)$ factor). Moreover, the maximum degree of points in\nany tree is an $\\textit{absolute constant}$ for any $d$. As a direct corollary,\nwe obtain an optimal {routing scheme} in low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. We\nalso present a $(1+\\varepsilon)$-stretch $\\textit{Steiner}$ tree cover (that\nmay use Steiner points) with $O_d(\\varepsilon^{(-d+1)/{2}} \\cdot\n\\log(1/\\varepsilon))$ trees, which too is optimal. The running time of our two\nconstructions is linear in the number of edges in the respective tree covers,\nignoring an additive $O_d(n \\log n)$ term; this improves over the running time\nunderlying the Dumbbell Theorem.","PeriodicalId":501570,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computational Geometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.17754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A $(1+\varepsilon)\textit{-stretch tree cover}$ of a metric space is a
collection of trees, where every pair of points has a $(1+\varepsilon)$-stretch
path in one of the trees. The celebrated $\textit{Dumbbell Theorem}$ [Arya
et~al. STOC'95] states that any set of $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean
space admits a $(1+\varepsilon)$-stretch tree cover with $O_d(\varepsilon^{-d}
\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon))$ trees, where the $O_d$ notation suppresses terms
that depend solely on the dimension~$d$. The running time of their construction
is $O_d(n \log n \cdot \frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\varepsilon^{d}} + n \cdot
\varepsilon^{-2d})$. Since the same point may occur in multiple levels of the
tree, the $\textit{maximum degree}$ of a point in the tree cover may be as
large as $\Omega(\log \Phi)$, where $\Phi$ is the aspect ratio of the input
point set. In this work we present a $(1+\varepsilon)$-stretch tree cover with
$O_d(\varepsilon^{-d+1} \cdot \log(1/\varepsilon))$ trees, which is optimal (up
to the $\log(1/\varepsilon)$ factor). Moreover, the maximum degree of points in
any tree is an $\textit{absolute constant}$ for any $d$. As a direct corollary,
we obtain an optimal {routing scheme} in low-dimensional Euclidean spaces. We
also present a $(1+\varepsilon)$-stretch $\textit{Steiner}$ tree cover (that
may use Steiner points) with $O_d(\varepsilon^{(-d+1)/{2}} \cdot
\log(1/\varepsilon))$ trees, which too is optimal. The running time of our two
constructions is linear in the number of edges in the respective tree covers,
ignoring an additive $O_d(n \log n)$ term; this improves over the running time
underlying the Dumbbell Theorem.