Improving acid-stressed anaerobic digestion processes with biochar - towards a combined biomass and carbon management system

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jiahui Hu, Michael Wachendorf, Willis Gwenzi, Ben Joseph, Kathrin Stenchly, Korbinian Kaetzl
{"title":"Improving acid-stressed anaerobic digestion processes with biochar - towards a combined biomass and carbon management system","authors":"Jiahui Hu, Michael Wachendorf, Willis Gwenzi, Ben Joseph, Kathrin Stenchly, Korbinian Kaetzl","doi":"10.1088/2515-7620/ad2bb7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interest in biochar as an additive to enhance anaerobic digestion (AD) has grown in the context of biomass cascading use and the 2050 net-zero goal. However, few studies have investigated the effects of biochar on AD from a biochar production perspective, including biomass feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. To valorise biomass and better understand the mechanisms and environmental implications of using biochar in AD, this study investigated the effects of distinct biochar types on AD under acid stress-induced process inhibition using batch tests. The results demonstrated that biochar can mitigate acid stress and enhance the methane production rate. The kinetic rate constant of methane production is positively related to the buffer capacity of the tested biochars (<italic toggle=\"yes\">R</italic>\n<sup>2</sup> = 0.88). The choice of feedstocks is a crucial factor (<italic toggle=\"yes\">P</italic> = 0.003), particularly the best-performing biochars derived from raw grass silage. In contrast, the pyrolysis temperature effect was less significant (<italic toggle=\"yes\">P</italic> = 0.18). Furthermore, the analysis of biochar indicates that the alkali (K) and alkaline earth (Ca, Mg) metals contained in biochar may be one of the important factors contributing to buffer capacity (<italic toggle=\"yes\">R</italic>\n<sup>2</sup> = 0.82 to 0.86). Hence, buffer capacity is a crucial quality criteria when evaluating biochar for AD applications. Raw grass silage biochars are promising for acid stress mitigation due to their high buffer capacity, while carbon-rich woody biochars have high CO<sub>2</sub> sequestration potential. A compromise between mitigating acid stress and sequestering carbon is the use of pre-treated grass biochar. Overall, the use of biochar-enriched digestate offers a potential way to close material loops and complete the biomass-to-biochar value chain.","PeriodicalId":48496,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Communications","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad2bb7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in biochar as an additive to enhance anaerobic digestion (AD) has grown in the context of biomass cascading use and the 2050 net-zero goal. However, few studies have investigated the effects of biochar on AD from a biochar production perspective, including biomass feedstocks and pyrolysis temperatures. To valorise biomass and better understand the mechanisms and environmental implications of using biochar in AD, this study investigated the effects of distinct biochar types on AD under acid stress-induced process inhibition using batch tests. The results demonstrated that biochar can mitigate acid stress and enhance the methane production rate. The kinetic rate constant of methane production is positively related to the buffer capacity of the tested biochars (R 2 = 0.88). The choice of feedstocks is a crucial factor (P = 0.003), particularly the best-performing biochars derived from raw grass silage. In contrast, the pyrolysis temperature effect was less significant (P = 0.18). Furthermore, the analysis of biochar indicates that the alkali (K) and alkaline earth (Ca, Mg) metals contained in biochar may be one of the important factors contributing to buffer capacity (R 2 = 0.82 to 0.86). Hence, buffer capacity is a crucial quality criteria when evaluating biochar for AD applications. Raw grass silage biochars are promising for acid stress mitigation due to their high buffer capacity, while carbon-rich woody biochars have high CO2 sequestration potential. A compromise between mitigating acid stress and sequestering carbon is the use of pre-treated grass biochar. Overall, the use of biochar-enriched digestate offers a potential way to close material loops and complete the biomass-to-biochar value chain.
用生物炭改进酸性厌氧消化工艺--实现生物质和碳的综合管理系统
在生物质梯级利用和 2050 年净零目标的背景下,人们对生物炭作为一种添加剂来提高厌氧消化(AD)的兴趣与日俱增。然而,很少有研究从生物炭生产的角度调查生物炭对厌氧消化的影响,包括生物质原料和热解温度。为了提高生物质的价值,并更好地了解在厌氧消化(AD)过程中使用生物炭的机制和对环境的影响,本研究采用批量试验的方法,调查了不同类型的生物炭在酸应力诱导的过程抑制下对厌氧消化(AD)的影响。结果表明,生物炭可以减轻酸胁迫,提高甲烷生产率。甲烷生产的动力学速率常数与测试生物炭的缓冲能力呈正相关(R2 = 0.88)。原料的选择是一个关键因素(P = 0.003),尤其是来自生草青贮的生物酵素表现最好。相比之下,热解温度的影响不太显著(P = 0.18)。此外,对生物炭的分析表明,生物炭中所含的碱金属(K)和碱土金属(Ca、Mg)可能是影响缓冲能力的重要因素之一(R2 = 0.82 至 0.86)。因此,在评估用于厌氧消化(AD)的生物炭时,缓冲能力是一项重要的质量标准。生草青贮生物炭因其缓冲能力强而有望缓解酸胁迫,而富含碳的木质生物炭则具有较高的二氧化碳封存潜力。使用预处理过的草生物炭是缓解酸胁迫和固碳的折中方法。总之,使用富含生物炭的沼渣为闭合材料循环和完成从生物质到生物炭的价值链提供了一条潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research Communications
Environmental Research Communications ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
136
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信