Understanding bike-sharing usage patterns of members and casual users: A case study in New York City

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Kehua Wang , Xiaoyu Yan , Zheng Zhu , Xiqun (Michael) Chen
{"title":"Understanding bike-sharing usage patterns of members and casual users: A case study in New York City","authors":"Kehua Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Yan ,&nbsp;Zheng Zhu ,&nbsp;Xiqun (Michael) Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shared bicycle travel has become an important travel mode for urban residents, and bike-sharing platforms are also booming in major cities worldwide. The bike-sharing platform provides users with systematic services: <em>members</em> refer to annual bike-sharing service subscribers and <em>casual users</em> refer to holders of a day pass or single ride ticket. Even though casual users account for a large share of ridership and revenue at bike-share systems in New York City (NYC), very little is known about the characteristics and preferences of casual users and how they compare to members. Based on the open-docked bike-sharing dataset from Citi Bike, we analyze the bike usage patterns of members and casual users in NYC, and how these patterns change in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic on a typical day level. We find that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively influenced members' bike trip counts on weekdays; bike travel time increases for members during the pandemic and decreases for casual users after the pandemic. To make a profound study concerning spatial heterogeneities, we employ Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to cluster the spatiotemporal changes of the station-level bike usage and obtain four clusters for each user type. Combined with the Points of Interest (POI) information, we find that member-related cluster with commuting POIs is significantly affected by the pandemic, while leisure trips are the most severely affected for casual users. Compared with the central area, peripheral clusters with residential and religious POIs are less affected by the pandemic. According to our findings, new operational strategies such as flexible subscriptions can be developed to attract more users, maintain their stickiness, and improve the bike-sharing level of services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X24000565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared bicycle travel has become an important travel mode for urban residents, and bike-sharing platforms are also booming in major cities worldwide. The bike-sharing platform provides users with systematic services: members refer to annual bike-sharing service subscribers and casual users refer to holders of a day pass or single ride ticket. Even though casual users account for a large share of ridership and revenue at bike-share systems in New York City (NYC), very little is known about the characteristics and preferences of casual users and how they compare to members. Based on the open-docked bike-sharing dataset from Citi Bike, we analyze the bike usage patterns of members and casual users in NYC, and how these patterns change in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic on a typical day level. We find that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively influenced members' bike trip counts on weekdays; bike travel time increases for members during the pandemic and decreases for casual users after the pandemic. To make a profound study concerning spatial heterogeneities, we employ Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to cluster the spatiotemporal changes of the station-level bike usage and obtain four clusters for each user type. Combined with the Points of Interest (POI) information, we find that member-related cluster with commuting POIs is significantly affected by the pandemic, while leisure trips are the most severely affected for casual users. Compared with the central area, peripheral clusters with residential and religious POIs are less affected by the pandemic. According to our findings, new operational strategies such as flexible subscriptions can be developed to attract more users, maintain their stickiness, and improve the bike-sharing level of services.

了解共享单车会员和临时用户的使用模式:纽约市案例研究
共享单车出行已成为城市居民的重要出行方式,共享单车平台也在世界各大城市蓬勃发展。共享单车平台为用户提供系统化服务:会员是指共享单车服务的年度用户,散客是指持有日票或单次骑行票的用户。尽管散客在纽约市(NYC)共享单车系统的骑行人数和收入中占很大比例,但人们对散客的特点和偏好以及他们与会员的比较却知之甚少。基于花旗自行车的开放式停放共享单车数据集,我们分析了纽约市会员和临时用户的单车使用模式,以及这些模式在 COVID-19 大流行的情况下如何发生日常变化。我们发现,COVID-19 大流行对会员平日的自行车出行次数产生了负面影响;在大流行期间,会员的自行车出行时间增加,而在大流行之后,临时用户的自行车出行时间减少。为了对空间异质性进行深入研究,我们采用高斯混合模型(GMM)对站点级自行车使用率的时空变化进行聚类,每个用户类型得到四个聚类。结合兴趣点(POI)信息,我们发现与通勤兴趣点相关的成员聚类受疫情影响较大,而休闲出行的散客受影响最严重。与中心区相比,拥有居住和宗教兴趣点的外围集群受疫情影响较小。根据我们的研究结果,可以开发新的运营策略,如灵活的订阅方式,以吸引更多用户,保持他们的粘性,提高共享单车的服务水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信