Incidental AVF creation during unrelated hospitalization is associated with worse outcomes compared with outpatient AVF creation.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1177/11297298241240169
Muhammad Saad Hafeez, Othman M Abdul-Malak, Katherine M Reitz, Catherine Go, Mohammad H Eslami, Rabih A Chaer, Theodore H Yuo
{"title":"Incidental AVF creation during unrelated hospitalization is associated with worse outcomes compared with outpatient AVF creation.","authors":"Muhammad Saad Hafeez, Othman M Abdul-Malak, Katherine M Reitz, Catherine Go, Mohammad H Eslami, Rabih A Chaer, Theodore H Yuo","doi":"10.1177/11297298241240169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation during an inpatient hospitalization is often performed for patient convenience and to ensure compliance. We sought to evaluate whether this approach has comparable outcomes to outpatient AVF creation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients undergoing index AVF creation from the United States Renal Data System dataset (2012-2017). Patients were grouped into outpatient and inpatient. Outpatient included patients that were operated in either an outpatient setting, ambulatory surgical center or were admitted inpatient on the day of AVF creation. Inpatient included only patients with claims for an inpatient visit before access creation. Multiple safety outcomes were compared between groups using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression methods generating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). One-year maturation rates were compared using competing-risks regression methods generating sub-hazard ratios (sHR) and 95% CI. Outcomes were also compared after 1:1 propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 68,872 patients undergoing AVF creation, 4855 (7.1%) of which were created during inpatient hospitalization. Patients in the inpatient group were older (65.8 ± 13.8 vs 65.2 ± 13.8, <i>p</i> = 0.002), more likely to be of Black race (28.1% vs 26.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and have cardiovascular comorbidities (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients in the inpatient groups were more likely to be dialyzed at for-profit (88.1% vs 85.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and freestanding (94.8% vs 92.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) dialysis centers. On both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, inpatient group was more likely to experience 30-day adverse events (e.g. pneumonia, COPD exacerbation, stroke, myocardial infarction), any complication, and all-cause mortality. On competing risks analysis, successful two-needle cannulation at 1 year was significantly less likely in the inpatient group (68.1% vs 76.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01; sHR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.65-0.71], <i>p</i> < 0.01). These trends were robust on 1:1 propensity matching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incidental AVF creation in hospitalized patients is associated with worse outcomes, ranging from mortality to postoperative complications to fistula maturation, compared with outpatient AVF creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"783-792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298241240169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation during an inpatient hospitalization is often performed for patient convenience and to ensure compliance. We sought to evaluate whether this approach has comparable outcomes to outpatient AVF creation.

Methods: We identified patients undergoing index AVF creation from the United States Renal Data System dataset (2012-2017). Patients were grouped into outpatient and inpatient. Outpatient included patients that were operated in either an outpatient setting, ambulatory surgical center or were admitted inpatient on the day of AVF creation. Inpatient included only patients with claims for an inpatient visit before access creation. Multiple safety outcomes were compared between groups using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression methods generating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). One-year maturation rates were compared using competing-risks regression methods generating sub-hazard ratios (sHR) and 95% CI. Outcomes were also compared after 1:1 propensity score matching.

Results: We identified 68,872 patients undergoing AVF creation, 4855 (7.1%) of which were created during inpatient hospitalization. Patients in the inpatient group were older (65.8 ± 13.8 vs 65.2 ± 13.8, p = 0.002), more likely to be of Black race (28.1% vs 26.8%, p = 0.02), and have cardiovascular comorbidities (all p < 0.05). Patients in the inpatient groups were more likely to be dialyzed at for-profit (88.1% vs 85.9%, p < 0.01) and freestanding (94.8% vs 92.9%, p < 0.01) dialysis centers. On both unadjusted and adjusted analysis, inpatient group was more likely to experience 30-day adverse events (e.g. pneumonia, COPD exacerbation, stroke, myocardial infarction), any complication, and all-cause mortality. On competing risks analysis, successful two-needle cannulation at 1 year was significantly less likely in the inpatient group (68.1% vs 76.8%, p < 0.01; sHR = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.65-0.71], p < 0.01). These trends were robust on 1:1 propensity matching.

Conclusion: Incidental AVF creation in hospitalized patients is associated with worse outcomes, ranging from mortality to postoperative complications to fistula maturation, compared with outpatient AVF creation.

与在门诊建立动静脉瘘相比,在无关的住院期间意外建立动静脉瘘与较差的预后有关。
导言:为了方便患者并确保患者遵从医嘱,在住院期间通常会进行动静脉瘘(AVF)置管术。我们试图评估这种方法的疗效是否与门诊动静脉瘘成形术相当:我们从美国肾脏数据系统数据集(2012-2017 年)中确定了接受指数动静脉瓣膜置换术的患者。患者分为门诊患者和住院患者。门诊患者包括在门诊环境、非住院手术中心接受手术的患者,或在建立动静脉瘘当天住院的患者。住院病人只包括在建立通道前住院就诊的患者。使用未调整和调整后的逻辑回归方法生成几率比和 95% 置信区间 (95%CI),比较不同组间的多重安全性结果。使用竞争风险回归法比较了一年的成熟率,得出了次危险比 (sHR) 和 95% CI。此外,还对 1:1 倾向评分匹配后的结果进行了比较:我们确定了 68872 名接受动静脉瘘创建手术的患者,其中 4855 人(7.1%)是在住院期间创建的。住院组患者的年龄更大(65.8 ± 13.8 vs 65.2 ± 13.8,p = 0.002),更有可能是黑人(28.1% vs 26.8%,p = 0.02),并有心血管合并症(所有 p p p p p p 结论:住院组患者的年龄更大(65.8 ± 13.8 vs 65.2 ± 13.8,p = 0.002),更有可能是黑人(28.1% vs 26.8%,p = 0.02),并有心血管合并症(所有 p p p p p与在门诊建立动静脉瘘相比,在住院患者中偶然建立动静脉瘘会导致更坏的结果,包括死亡率、术后并发症和瘘管成熟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信