[OPTINOFA-Intelligent assistance service for structured assessment in the emergency department].

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elisabeth Nyoungui, Marina V Karg, Marc Wieckenberg, Katrin Esslinger, Michael Schmucker, Andreas Reiswich, Kai L Antweiler, Tim Friede, Martin Haag, Harald Dormann, Sabine Blaschke
{"title":"[OPTINOFA-Intelligent assistance service for structured assessment in the emergency department].","authors":"Elisabeth Nyoungui, Marina V Karg, Marc Wieckenberg, Katrin Esslinger, Michael Schmucker, Andreas Reiswich, Kai L Antweiler, Tim Friede, Martin Haag, Harald Dormann, Sabine Blaschke","doi":"10.1007/s00063-024-01126-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Case numbers in central emergency departments (EDs) have risen during the past decade in Germany, leading to recurrent overcrowding, increased risks in emergency care, and elevated costs. Particularly the fraction of outpatient emergency treatments has increased disproportionately. Within the framework of the Optimization of emergency care by structured triage with intelligent assistant service (OPTINOFA, Förderkennzeichen [FKZ] 01NVF17035) project, an intelligent assistance service was developed.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>New triage algorithms were developed for the 20 most frequent leading symptoms on the basis of established triage systems (emergency severity index, ESI; Manchester triage system, MTS) and provided as web-based intelligent assistance services on mobile devices. To evaluate the validity, reliability, and safety of the new OPTINOFA triage instrument, a pilot study was conducted in three EDs after ethics committee approval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pilot study, n = 718 ED patients were included (age 59.1 ± 22 years; 349 male, 369 female). With respect to disposition (out-/inpatient), a sensitivity of 91.1% and a specificity of 40.7%, and a good correlation with the OPTINOFA triage levels were detected (Spearman's rank correlation ρ = 0.41). Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of disposition according to the OPTINOFA triage level was 0.73. The in-hospital mortality rate of OPTINOFA triage levels 4 and 5 was 0%. The association between the length of ED stay and the OPTINOFA triage level was shown to be significant (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the pilot study demonstrate the safety and validity of the new triage system OPTINOFA. By definition of both urgency and emergency care level, new customized perspectives for load reduction in German EDs via a closer cooperation between out- and inpatient sectors of emergency care could be established.</p>","PeriodicalId":49019,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"208-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik-Intensivmedizin Und Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-024-01126-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Case numbers in central emergency departments (EDs) have risen during the past decade in Germany, leading to recurrent overcrowding, increased risks in emergency care, and elevated costs. Particularly the fraction of outpatient emergency treatments has increased disproportionately. Within the framework of the Optimization of emergency care by structured triage with intelligent assistant service (OPTINOFA, Förderkennzeichen [FKZ] 01NVF17035) project, an intelligent assistance service was developed.

Patients and methods: New triage algorithms were developed for the 20 most frequent leading symptoms on the basis of established triage systems (emergency severity index, ESI; Manchester triage system, MTS) and provided as web-based intelligent assistance services on mobile devices. To evaluate the validity, reliability, and safety of the new OPTINOFA triage instrument, a pilot study was conducted in three EDs after ethics committee approval.

Results: In the pilot study, n = 718 ED patients were included (age 59.1 ± 22 years; 349 male, 369 female). With respect to disposition (out-/inpatient), a sensitivity of 91.1% and a specificity of 40.7%, and a good correlation with the OPTINOFA triage levels were detected (Spearman's rank correlation ρ = 0.41). Furthermore, the area under the curve (AUC) for prediction of disposition according to the OPTINOFA triage level was 0.73. The in-hospital mortality rate of OPTINOFA triage levels 4 and 5 was 0%. The association between the length of ED stay and the OPTINOFA triage level was shown to be significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The results of the pilot study demonstrate the safety and validity of the new triage system OPTINOFA. By definition of both urgency and emergency care level, new customized perspectives for load reduction in German EDs via a closer cooperation between out- and inpatient sectors of emergency care could be established.

[OPTINOFA--急诊科结构化评估智能辅助服务]。
背景:在过去十年中,德国中心急诊室(ED)的病例数不断增加,导致急诊室经常人满为患,急诊风险增加,成本上升。尤其是门诊急诊的比例增长过快。在 "通过智能辅助服务结构化分诊优化急诊护理"(OPTINOFA,Förderkennzeichen [FKZ] 01NVF17035)项目框架内,开发了一种智能辅助服务:患者和方法:在已建立的分诊系统(急诊严重程度指数,ESI;曼彻斯特分诊系统,MTS)基础上,针对 20 种最常见的主要症状开发了新的分诊算法,并在移动设备上提供基于网络的智能辅助服务。为了评估新的 OPTINOFA 分诊工具的有效性、可靠性和安全性,经伦理委员会批准后,在三家急诊室进行了试点研究:在试点研究中,共纳入了 n = 718 名急诊室患者(年龄为 59.1 ± 22 岁;男性 349 人,女性 369 人)。在处置(门诊/住院)方面,灵敏度为 91.1%,特异性为 40.7%,与 OPTINOFA 分流水平有良好的相关性(Spearman's rank correlation ρ = 0.41)。此外,根据 OPTINOFA 分级预测处置的曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.73。OPTINOFA 分流级别 4 和 5 的院内死亡率为 0%。急诊室住院时间与 OPTINOFA 分流级别之间的关系被证明是显著的(p 结论:OPTINOFA 分流级别与急诊室住院时间之间的关系是显著的:试点研究结果证明了新分流系统 OPTINOFA 的安全性和有效性。通过对紧急程度和急诊级别的定义,可以为德国急诊室通过门诊和住院急诊之间的密切合作来减少负荷提供新的定制视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medizinische Klinik – Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin is an internationally respected interdisciplinary journal. It is intended for physicians, nurses, respiratory and physical therapists active in intensive care and accident/emergency units, but also for internists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, neurologists, and pediatricians with special interest in intensive care medicine. Comprehensive reviews describe the most recent advances in the field of internal medicine with special focus on intensive care problems. Freely submitted original articles present important studies in this discipline and promote scientific exchange, while articles in the category Photo essay feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In the rubric journal club well-respected experts comment on outstanding international publications. Review articles under the rubric "Continuing Medical Education" present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice. The rubrics "Nursing practice" and "Physical therapy" round out the information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信