Assessing the effects of prehabilitation protocols on post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity surgery: does early optimization lead to optimal clinical outcomes?

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00845-8
Pawel P Jankowski, Peter S Tretiakov, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Ankita Das, Bailey Imbo, Oscar Krol, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Tyler Williamson, Pooja Dave, Jamshaid Mir, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Peter G Passias
{"title":"Assessing the effects of prehabilitation protocols on post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity surgery: does early optimization lead to optimal clinical outcomes?","authors":"Pawel P Jankowski, Peter S Tretiakov, Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Ankita Das, Bailey Imbo, Oscar Krol, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Tyler Williamson, Pooja Dave, Jamshaid Mir, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Peter G Passias","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00845-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effect of a prehabilitation program on peri- and post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity (CD) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Operative CD patients ≥ 18 years with complete baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were stratified by enrollment in a prehabilitation program beginning in 2019. Patients were stratified as having undergone prehabilitation (Prehab+) or not (Prehab-). Differences in pre and post-op factors were assessed via means comparison analysis. Costs were calculated using PearlDiver database estimates from Medicare pay-scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>115 patients were included (age: 61 years, 70% female, BMI: 28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Of these patients, 57 (49%) were classified as Prehab+. At baseline, groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, CCI, and frailty. Surgically, Prehab+ were able to undergo longer procedures (p = 0.017) with equivalent EBL (p = 0.627), and shorter SICU stay (p < 0.001). Post-operatively, Prehab+ patients reported greater reduction in pain scores and greater improvement in quality of life metrics at both 1Y and 2Y than Prehab- patients (all p < 0.05). Prehab+ patients reported significantly less complications overall, as well as less need for reoperation (all p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Introducing prehabilitation protocols in adult cervical deformity surgery may aid in improving patient physiological status, enabling patients to undergo longer surgeries with lessened risk of peri- and post-operative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00845-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of a prehabilitation program on peri- and post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity (CD) surgery.

Methods: Operative CD patients ≥ 18 years with complete baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were stratified by enrollment in a prehabilitation program beginning in 2019. Patients were stratified as having undergone prehabilitation (Prehab+) or not (Prehab-). Differences in pre and post-op factors were assessed via means comparison analysis. Costs were calculated using PearlDiver database estimates from Medicare pay-scales.

Results: 115 patients were included (age: 61 years, 70% female, BMI: 28 kg/m2). Of these patients, 57 (49%) were classified as Prehab+. At baseline, groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, CCI, and frailty. Surgically, Prehab+ were able to undergo longer procedures (p = 0.017) with equivalent EBL (p = 0.627), and shorter SICU stay (p < 0.001). Post-operatively, Prehab+ patients reported greater reduction in pain scores and greater improvement in quality of life metrics at both 1Y and 2Y than Prehab- patients (all p < 0.05). Prehab+ patients reported significantly less complications overall, as well as less need for reoperation (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Introducing prehabilitation protocols in adult cervical deformity surgery may aid in improving patient physiological status, enabling patients to undergo longer surgeries with lessened risk of peri- and post-operative complications.

评估术前康复方案对成人颈椎畸形手术术后效果的影响:早期优化是否能带来最佳临床效果?
目的:研究康复计划对成人颈椎畸形(CD)手术围手术期和术后效果的影响:对年龄≥18岁、具有完整基线(BL)和2年(2Y)数据的颈椎畸形(CD)手术患者进行分层,根据其是否参加了2019年开始的康复前计划进行分类。患者分层为接受过康复前治疗(Prehab+)或未接受康复前治疗(Prehab-)。术前和术后因素的差异通过均值比较分析进行评估。费用使用PearlDiver数据库根据医疗保险支付标准估算得出:共纳入 115 名患者(年龄:61 岁,70% 为女性,体重指数:28 kg/m2)。其中 57 名患者(49%)被归类为 Prehab+。在基线时,各组在年龄、性别、体重指数、CCI 和虚弱程度方面具有可比性。在手术方面,Prehab+ 可以接受更长时间的手术(p = 0.017),EBL 相等(p = 0.627),SICU 留院时间更短(p 结论:Prehab+ 可以接受更长时间的手术(p = 0.017),EBL 相等(p = 0.627):在成人颈椎畸形手术中引入预康复方案有助于改善患者的生理状态,使患者能够接受更长时间的手术,并降低围手术期和术后并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信