Evaluating the Prevalence of Four Recommended Practices for Suicide Prevention Following Hospital Discharge

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Salome O. Chitavi PhD (is Research Scientist II, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.), Jamie Patrianakos PhD (is Research Scientist I, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement. The Joint Commission.), Scott C. Williams PsyD (is Director, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission.), Stephen P. Schmaltz PhD, MPH, MS (is Senior Biostatistician, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission.), Brian K. Ahmedani PhD, LMSW (is Director, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, and Director of Research, Behavioral Health Services, Henry Ford Health, Detroit.), Kimberly Roaten PhD, ABPP (is Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.), Edwin D. Boudreaux PhD (is Professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School.), Gregory K. Brown PhD (is Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology in Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennyslvania. Please address correspondence to Salome Chitavi)
{"title":"Evaluating the Prevalence of Four Recommended Practices for Suicide Prevention Following Hospital Discharge","authors":"Salome O. Chitavi PhD (is Research Scientist II, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois.),&nbsp;Jamie Patrianakos PhD (is Research Scientist I, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement. The Joint Commission.),&nbsp;Scott C. Williams PsyD (is Director, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission.),&nbsp;Stephen P. Schmaltz PhD, MPH, MS (is Senior Biostatistician, Department of Research, Division of Healthcare Quality Evaluation and Improvement, The Joint Commission.),&nbsp;Brian K. Ahmedani PhD, LMSW (is Director, Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, and Director of Research, Behavioral Health Services, Henry Ford Health, Detroit.),&nbsp;Kimberly Roaten PhD, ABPP (is Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.),&nbsp;Edwin D. Boudreaux PhD (is Professor, Departments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School.),&nbsp;Gregory K. Brown PhD (is Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology in Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennyslvania. Please address correspondence to Salome Chitavi)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) for suicide prevention (NPSG.15.01.01) requires that accredited hospitals maintain policies/procedures for follow-up care at discharge for patients identified as at risk for suicide. The proportion of hospitals meeting these requirements through use of recommended discharge practices is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional observational study explored the prevalence of suicide prevention activities among Joint Commission–accredited hospitals. A questionnaire was sent to 1,148 accredited hospitals. The authors calculated the percentage of hospitals reporting implementation of four recommended discharge practices for suicide prevention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,148 hospitals, 346 (30.1%) responded. The majority (<em>n</em> = 212 [61.3%]) of hospitals had implemented formal safety planning, but few of those (<em>n</em> = 41 [19.3%]) included all key components of safety planning. Approximately a third of hospitals provided a warm handoff to outpatient care (<em>n</em> = 128 [37.0%)] or made follow-up contact with patients (<em>n</em> = 105 [30.3%]), and approximately a quarter (<em>n</em> = 97 [28.0%]) developed a plan for lethal means safety. Very few (<em>n</em> = 14 [4.0%]) hospitals met full criteria for implementing recommended suicide prevention activities at time of discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study revealed a significant gap in implementation of recommended practices related to prevention of suicide postdischarge. Additional research is needed to identify factors contributing to this implementation gap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024000679/pdfft?md5=e6b6403241b88154c3809606c04f8ba4&pid=1-s2.0-S1553725024000679-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725024000679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) for suicide prevention (NPSG.15.01.01) requires that accredited hospitals maintain policies/procedures for follow-up care at discharge for patients identified as at risk for suicide. The proportion of hospitals meeting these requirements through use of recommended discharge practices is unknown.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study explored the prevalence of suicide prevention activities among Joint Commission–accredited hospitals. A questionnaire was sent to 1,148 accredited hospitals. The authors calculated the percentage of hospitals reporting implementation of four recommended discharge practices for suicide prevention.

Results

Of 1,148 hospitals, 346 (30.1%) responded. The majority (n = 212 [61.3%]) of hospitals had implemented formal safety planning, but few of those (n = 41 [19.3%]) included all key components of safety planning. Approximately a third of hospitals provided a warm handoff to outpatient care (n = 128 [37.0%)] or made follow-up contact with patients (n = 105 [30.3%]), and approximately a quarter (n = 97 [28.0%]) developed a plan for lethal means safety. Very few (n = 14 [4.0%]) hospitals met full criteria for implementing recommended suicide prevention activities at time of discharge.

Conclusion

The study revealed a significant gap in implementation of recommended practices related to prevention of suicide postdischarge. Additional research is needed to identify factors contributing to this implementation gap.

评估出院后预防自杀的四项建议措施的普遍性。
背景:联合委员会关于预防自杀的国家患者安全目标(NPSG)(NPSG.15.01.01)要求获得认证的医院制定相关政策/程序,对被确认有自杀风险的患者进行出院后续护理。目前尚不清楚通过使用推荐的出院措施来达到这些要求的医院比例:这项横断面观察研究探讨了获得联合委员会认证的医院中开展自杀预防活动的普遍程度。研究人员向 1148 家通过认证的医院发放了调查问卷。作者计算了报告实施了四种预防自杀建议出院措施的医院的百分比:在 1,148 家医院中,有 346 家(30.1%)做出了回复。大多数医院(n = 212 [61.3%])都实施了正式的安全规划,但其中只有少数医院(n = 41 [19.3%])包含了安全规划的所有关键要素。约三分之一的医院为门诊病人提供了温馨的交接服务(n = 128 [37.0%]),或与病人进行了后续联系(n = 105 [30.3%]),约四分之一的医院(n = 97 [28.0%])制定了致命手段安全计划。只有极少数医院(n = 14 [4.0%])完全符合在患者出院时开展建议的预防自杀活动的标准:研究显示,在实施与预防出院后自杀相关的建议措施方面存在很大差距。需要开展更多的研究来确定造成这种实施差距的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信