Semiautomated approach focused on new genomic information results in time and effort-efficient reannotation of negative exome data.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Human Genetics Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s00439-024-02664-3
Alejandro Ferrer, Patrick Duffy, Rory J Olson, Michael A Meiners, Laura Schultz-Rogers, Erica L Macke, Stephanie Safgren, Joel A Morales-Rosado, Margot A Cousin, Gavin R Oliver, David Rider, Megan Williams, Pavel N Pichurin, David R Deyle, Eva Morava, Ralitza H Gavrilova, Radhika Dhamija, Klass J Wierenga, Brendan C Lanpher, Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic, Charu Kaiwar, Carolyn R Vitek, Tammy M McAllister, Myra J Wick, Lisa A Schimmenti, Konstantinos N Lazaridis, Filippo Pinto E Vairo, Eric W Klee
{"title":"Semiautomated approach focused on new genomic information results in time and effort-efficient reannotation of negative exome data.","authors":"Alejandro Ferrer, Patrick Duffy, Rory J Olson, Michael A Meiners, Laura Schultz-Rogers, Erica L Macke, Stephanie Safgren, Joel A Morales-Rosado, Margot A Cousin, Gavin R Oliver, David Rider, Megan Williams, Pavel N Pichurin, David R Deyle, Eva Morava, Ralitza H Gavrilova, Radhika Dhamija, Klass J Wierenga, Brendan C Lanpher, Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic, Charu Kaiwar, Carolyn R Vitek, Tammy M McAllister, Myra J Wick, Lisa A Schimmenti, Konstantinos N Lazaridis, Filippo Pinto E Vairo, Eric W Klee","doi":"10.1007/s00439-024-02664-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most rare disease patients (75-50%) undergoing genomic sequencing remain unsolved, often due to lack of information about variants identified. Data review over time can leverage novel information regarding disease-causing variants and genes, increasing this diagnostic yield. However, time and resource constraints have limited reanalysis of genetic data in clinical laboratories setting. We developed RENEW, (REannotation of NEgative WES/WGS) an automated reannotation procedure that uses relevant new information in on-line genomic databases to enable rapid review of genomic findings. We tested RENEW in an unselected cohort of 1066 undiagnosed cases with a broad spectrum of phenotypes from the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine using new information in ClinVar, HGMD and OMIM between the date of previous analysis/testing and April of 2022. 5741 variants prioritized by RENEW were rapidly reviewed by variant interpretation specialists. Mean analysis time was approximately 20 s per variant (32 h total time). Reviewed cases were classified as: 879 (93.0%) undiagnosed, 63 (6.6%) putatively diagnosed, and 4 (0.4%) definitively diagnosed. New strategies are needed to enable efficient review of genomic findings in unsolved cases. We report on a fast and practical approach to address this need and improve overall diagnostic success in patient testing through a recurrent reannotation process.</p>","PeriodicalId":13175,"journal":{"name":"Human Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-024-02664-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most rare disease patients (75-50%) undergoing genomic sequencing remain unsolved, often due to lack of information about variants identified. Data review over time can leverage novel information regarding disease-causing variants and genes, increasing this diagnostic yield. However, time and resource constraints have limited reanalysis of genetic data in clinical laboratories setting. We developed RENEW, (REannotation of NEgative WES/WGS) an automated reannotation procedure that uses relevant new information in on-line genomic databases to enable rapid review of genomic findings. We tested RENEW in an unselected cohort of 1066 undiagnosed cases with a broad spectrum of phenotypes from the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine using new information in ClinVar, HGMD and OMIM between the date of previous analysis/testing and April of 2022. 5741 variants prioritized by RENEW were rapidly reviewed by variant interpretation specialists. Mean analysis time was approximately 20 s per variant (32 h total time). Reviewed cases were classified as: 879 (93.0%) undiagnosed, 63 (6.6%) putatively diagnosed, and 4 (0.4%) definitively diagnosed. New strategies are needed to enable efficient review of genomic findings in unsolved cases. We report on a fast and practical approach to address this need and improve overall diagnostic success in patient testing through a recurrent reannotation process.

Abstract Image

以新基因组信息为重点的半自动化方法可以省时省力地重新标注阴性外显子组数据。
大多数接受基因组测序的罕见病患者(75%-50%)的病情仍未得到解决,这往往是由于缺乏已发现变异的相关信息。随着时间的推移对数据进行审查,可以获得有关致病变异和基因的新信息,从而提高诊断率。然而,时间和资源的限制限制了临床实验室对基因数据的再分析。我们开发了 RENEW(REannotation of NEgative WES/WGS),这是一种自动重新注释程序,它利用在线基因组数据库中的相关新信息来快速审查基因组结果。我们利用 ClinVar、HGMD 和 OMIM 中从上次分析/测试日期到 2022 年 4 月期间的新信息,在梅奥临床个体化医学中心的 1066 个未诊断病例的未选择队列中测试了 RENEW。变异解读专家对 RENEW 确定优先级的 5741 个变异进行了快速审查。每个变异的平均分析时间约为 20 秒(总时间为 32 小时)。审查过的病例被归类为879例(93.0%)未诊断,63例(6.6%)推断诊断,4例(0.4%)明确诊断。我们需要新的策略来高效审查未决病例的基因组结果。我们报告了一种快速实用的方法来满足这一需求,并通过经常性的重新注释过程提高患者检测的整体诊断成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Genetics
Human Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
94
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Genetics is a monthly journal publishing original and timely articles on all aspects of human genetics. The Journal particularly welcomes articles in the areas of Behavioral genetics, Bioinformatics, Cancer genetics and genomics, Cytogenetics, Developmental genetics, Disease association studies, Dysmorphology, ELSI (ethical, legal and social issues), Evolutionary genetics, Gene expression, Gene structure and organization, Genetics of complex diseases and epistatic interactions, Genetic epidemiology, Genome biology, Genome structure and organization, Genotype-phenotype relationships, Human Genomics, Immunogenetics and genomics, Linkage analysis and genetic mapping, Methods in Statistical Genetics, Molecular diagnostics, Mutation detection and analysis, Neurogenetics, Physical mapping and Population Genetics. Articles reporting animal models relevant to human biology or disease are also welcome. Preference will be given to those articles which address clinically relevant questions or which provide new insights into human biology. Unless reporting entirely novel and unusual aspects of a topic, clinical case reports, cytogenetic case reports, papers on descriptive population genetics, articles dealing with the frequency of polymorphisms or additional mutations within genes in which numerous lesions have already been described, and papers that report meta-analyses of previously published datasets will normally not be accepted. The Journal typically will not consider for publication manuscripts that report merely the isolation, map position, structure, and tissue expression profile of a gene of unknown function unless the gene is of particular interest or is a candidate gene involved in a human trait or disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信