Digital analysis of unilateral ptosis repair: external levator advancement vs. Müller's muscle conjunctival resection.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0028
Serdar Bilici, Tomurcuk Harbigil-Sever, Suat Hayri Ugurbas
{"title":"Digital analysis of unilateral ptosis repair: external levator advancement vs. Müller's muscle conjunctival resection.","authors":"Serdar Bilici, Tomurcuk Harbigil-Sever, Suat Hayri Ugurbas","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of lid contour and marginal peak point changes to compare outcomes of external levator advancement and Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection surgery in unilateral ptosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the charts of unilateral ptosis patients who underwent external levator advancement or Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection. Eyelid contour analysis was conducted on preoperative and 6-month postoperative digital images. This was performed with the multiple margin reflex distances technique, measuring the vertical distance from a line intersecting the center of the pupil to the eyelid margin at 10 positions at 2 mm intervals. The marginal peak point changes were analyzed digitally using the coordinates of the peak point according to the pupil center. Each position's mean distance was compared preoperatively, postoperatively, and with the fellow eyelid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients underwent external levator advancement and 16 patients had Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection. The mean margin reflex distance was improved by both techniques (1.46 vs. 2.43 mm and 1.12 vs. 2.25 mm, p=0.008 and p=0.0001 respectively) and approached that of the fellow eyelid (2.43 vs. 2.88 and 2.25 vs. 2.58 mm, p=0.23 and p=0.19, respectively). However, statistically significant lid margin elevation was limited to between the N6 and T6 points in the external levator advancement group. Whereas, significant elevation was achieved along the whole lid margin in the Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection group. The marginal peak point was shifted slightly laterally in the external levator advancement group (p=0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both techniques provide effective lid elevation, however, the external levator advancement's effect lessens toward the canthi while Müller's muscle conjunctival resection provides more uniform elevation across the lid margin. The margin reflex distance alone is not sufficient to reflect contour changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"87 3","pages":"e20230028"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of lid contour and marginal peak point changes to compare outcomes of external levator advancement and Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection surgery in unilateral ptosis.

Methods: We reviewed the charts of unilateral ptosis patients who underwent external levator advancement or Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection. Eyelid contour analysis was conducted on preoperative and 6-month postoperative digital images. This was performed with the multiple margin reflex distances technique, measuring the vertical distance from a line intersecting the center of the pupil to the eyelid margin at 10 positions at 2 mm intervals. The marginal peak point changes were analyzed digitally using the coordinates of the peak point according to the pupil center. Each position's mean distance was compared preoperatively, postoperatively, and with the fellow eyelid.

Results: Sixteen patients underwent external levator advancement and 16 patients had Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection. The mean margin reflex distance was improved by both techniques (1.46 vs. 2.43 mm and 1.12 vs. 2.25 mm, p=0.008 and p=0.0001 respectively) and approached that of the fellow eyelid (2.43 vs. 2.88 and 2.25 vs. 2.58 mm, p=0.23 and p=0.19, respectively). However, statistically significant lid margin elevation was limited to between the N6 and T6 points in the external levator advancement group. Whereas, significant elevation was achieved along the whole lid margin in the Miiller's muscle conjunctival resection group. The marginal peak point was shifted slightly laterally in the external levator advancement group (p=0.11).

Conclusions: Both techniques provide effective lid elevation, however, the external levator advancement's effect lessens toward the canthi while Müller's muscle conjunctival resection provides more uniform elevation across the lid margin. The margin reflex distance alone is not sufficient to reflect contour changes.

单侧上睑下垂修复术的数字分析:外睑提肌前移术与 Müller 肌肉结膜切除术。
目的:评估睑轮廓和睑缘峰值点的变化,比较单侧上睑下垂患者接受外上睑提肌腱膜前移术和米勒氏肌结膜切除术的疗效:我们查看了单侧上睑下垂患者的病历,这些患者都接受了外睑提肌前移术或米勒肌结膜切除术。对术前和术后 6 个月的数字图像进行了眼睑轮廓分析。该分析采用多边缘反射距离技术,测量从瞳孔中心线到眼睑边缘的垂直距离,每隔 2 毫米测量 10 个位置。根据瞳孔中心的峰值点坐标,对边缘峰值点的变化进行数字分析。对每个位置的平均距离进行术前、术后以及与同侧眼睑的比较:结果:16 名患者接受了外提肌推进术,16 名患者接受了米勒肌结膜切除术。两种技术均改善了平均睑缘反射距离(分别为 1.46 对 2.43 毫米和 1.12 对 2.25 毫米,p=0.008 和 p=0.0001),并接近同侧眼睑的平均反射距离(分别为 2.43 对 2.88 毫米和 2.25 对 2.58 毫米,p=0.23 和 p=0.19)。然而,在外侧提上睑肌前移组中,有统计学意义的睑缘抬高仅限于N6和T6点之间。而在米勒肌结膜切除术组,整个睑缘都有明显的提升。外上睑提肌腱膜前移组的边缘峰值点略微偏向外侧(P=0.11):结论:两种技术都能有效地抬高睑板,但是,外上睑提肌推进术的效果向眦角方向减弱,而米勒氏肌结膜切除术则能更均匀地抬高整个睑缘。仅凭睑缘反射距离不足以反映轮廓的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信