Same-day Ileostomy Closure Discharge Reduces Costs Without Compromising Outcomes: An Economic Analysis.

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006285
Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, James P Moriarty, Bijan J Borah, Amit Merchea, Luca Stocchi, David W Larson
{"title":"Same-day Ileostomy Closure Discharge Reduces Costs Without Compromising Outcomes: An Economic Analysis.","authors":"Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, James P Moriarty, Bijan J Borah, Amit Merchea, Luca Stocchi, David W Larson","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the costs of a same-day discharge (SDD) enhanced recovery pathway for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure compared with a standard institutional enhanced recovery protocol.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Every year, 50,155 patients in the United States undergo temporary stoma reversal. While ambulatory stoma closure has shown promise, widespread adoption remains slow. This study builds on previous research, focusing on the costs of a novel SDD protocol introduced in 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-control study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, comparing patients undergoing SDD DLI closure from August 2020 to February 2023 to those in a matched cohort receiving standard inpatient enhanced recovery protocol. Patients were matched based on age, sex, american society of anesthesiologists score, surgery period, and hospital. Primary outcomes included direct hospitalization and additional costs in the 30 days postdischarge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SDD group (n = 118) demonstrated a significant reduction in median index episode hospitalization and 30-day postoperative costs compared with the inpatient group (n = 236), with savings of $4827 per patient. Complication rates were similar, and so were readmission and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the SDD for DLI closure is associated with substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes. The study advocates for a shift towards SDD protocols, offering economic benefits and potential improvements in health care resource utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the costs of a same-day discharge (SDD) enhanced recovery pathway for diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) closure compared with a standard institutional enhanced recovery protocol.

Background: Every year, 50,155 patients in the United States undergo temporary stoma reversal. While ambulatory stoma closure has shown promise, widespread adoption remains slow. This study builds on previous research, focusing on the costs of a novel SDD protocol introduced in 2020.

Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, and Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, comparing patients undergoing SDD DLI closure from August 2020 to February 2023 to those in a matched cohort receiving standard inpatient enhanced recovery protocol. Patients were matched based on age, sex, american society of anesthesiologists score, surgery period, and hospital. Primary outcomes included direct hospitalization and additional costs in the 30 days postdischarge.

Results: The SDD group (n = 118) demonstrated a significant reduction in median index episode hospitalization and 30-day postoperative costs compared with the inpatient group (n = 236), with savings of $4827 per patient. Complication rates were similar, and so were readmission and reoperation rates.

Conclusions: Implementation of the SDD for DLI closure is associated with substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes. The study advocates for a shift towards SDD protocols, offering economic benefits and potential improvements in health care resource utilization.

当天回肠造口术闭合出院可降低成本而不影响疗效:经济分析。
目标:本研究旨在评估当日出院增强恢复路径(SDD)与标准机构增强恢复方案(ERP)相比,用于转流环状回肠造口关闭的成本:美国每年有 50,155 名患者接受临时造口翻转术。虽然非卧床造口闭合术前景看好,但其普及速度仍然缓慢。本研究在以往研究的基础上,重点研究了 2020 年推出的新型 SDD 方案的成本:明尼苏达州罗切斯特市梅奥诊所和佛罗里达州杰克逊维尔市梅奥诊所开展了一项回顾性病例对照研究,将 2020 年 8 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受当天出院分流回肠造口关闭术(SDD)的患者与接受标准住院ERP的匹配队列患者进行比较。患者根据年龄、性别、ASA 评分、手术时间和医院进行匹配。主要结果包括出院后30天内的直接住院费用和额外费用:与住院组(人数=236)相比,SDD组(人数=118)的中位指标住院率和术后30天费用显著降低,每位患者节省了4827美元。并发症发生率、再入院率和再手术率也相似:结论:采用 SDD 进行分流环回肠造口闭合术可在不影响患者预后的情况下节省大量成本。这项研究倡导向当天出院方案转变,从而带来经济效益,并有可能改善医疗资源的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信