A Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Strategy for Ruling Out Myocardial Infarction

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Patrik Gilje, Moman A. Mohammad, Andreas Roos, Ulf Ekelund, Jonas Björk, Bertil Lindahl, Martin Holzmann, Arash Mokhtari
{"title":"A Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Strategy for Ruling Out Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Patrik Gilje, Moman A. Mohammad, Andreas Roos, Ulf Ekelund, Jonas Björk, Bertil Lindahl, Martin Holzmann, Arash Mokhtari","doi":"10.1155/2024/2241528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Background</i>. Ruling out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. Studies have shown that a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) &lt;5 ng/L or &lt;6 ng/L at presentation (0 h) can be used to rule out AMI. The objective of this study was to identify whether an even higher hs-cTnT threshold can be used for a safe rule out of AMI in the ED. <i>Methods</i>. The derivation cohort consisted of 24,973 ED patients with a primary complaint of chest pain. In this cohort, we identified the highest concentration of 0 h hs-cTnT that corresponded to a negative predictive value (NPV) of ≥99.5% for the primary endpoint of AMI/all-cause death within 30 days and the secondary endpoint of all-cause death within one year. The results were validated in two cohorts consisting of 132,021 and 1167 ED chest pain patients. <i>Results</i>. The 0 h hs-cTnT threshold corresponding to a NPV of ≥99.5% for the primary endpoint was &lt;9 ng/L (NPV: 99.6% and 95% CI: 99.5–99.7). This cutoff provided a sensitivity of 96.2% (95% CI: 95.2–97.1) and identified 59.7% of the patients as low risk compared to 35.8% and 43.9% with a 0 h hs-cTnT &lt;5 ng/L and &lt;6 ng/L, respectively. The results were similar in the validation cohorts and seemed to perform even better in patients where the 0 h hs-cTnT was measured &gt;3 h after symptom onset and in those with a nonischemic ECG and nonhigh risk history. <i>Conclusions</i>. A 0 h hs-cTnT cutoff of &lt;9 ng/L safely rules out AMI/death within 30 days in a majority of chest pain patients and is a more effective strategy than the currently recommended &lt;5 ng/L and &lt;6 ng/L cutoffs. This trial is registered with NCT03421873.","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2241528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Ruling out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department (ED) is challenging. Studies have shown that a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) <5 ng/L or <6 ng/L at presentation (0 h) can be used to rule out AMI. The objective of this study was to identify whether an even higher hs-cTnT threshold can be used for a safe rule out of AMI in the ED. Methods. The derivation cohort consisted of 24,973 ED patients with a primary complaint of chest pain. In this cohort, we identified the highest concentration of 0 h hs-cTnT that corresponded to a negative predictive value (NPV) of ≥99.5% for the primary endpoint of AMI/all-cause death within 30 days and the secondary endpoint of all-cause death within one year. The results were validated in two cohorts consisting of 132,021 and 1167 ED chest pain patients. Results. The 0 h hs-cTnT threshold corresponding to a NPV of ≥99.5% for the primary endpoint was <9 ng/L (NPV: 99.6% and 95% CI: 99.5–99.7). This cutoff provided a sensitivity of 96.2% (95% CI: 95.2–97.1) and identified 59.7% of the patients as low risk compared to 35.8% and 43.9% with a 0 h hs-cTnT <5 ng/L and <6 ng/L, respectively. The results were similar in the validation cohorts and seemed to perform even better in patients where the 0 h hs-cTnT was measured >3 h after symptom onset and in those with a nonischemic ECG and nonhigh risk history. Conclusions. A 0 h hs-cTnT cutoff of <9 ng/L safely rules out AMI/death within 30 days in a majority of chest pain patients and is a more effective strategy than the currently recommended <5 ng/L and <6 ng/L cutoffs. This trial is registered with NCT03421873.
排除心肌梗死的单一高灵敏度心肌肌钙蛋白 T 策略
背景。在急诊科(ED)排除急性心肌梗死(AMI)是一项挑战。研究表明,发病时(0 h)的高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T(hs-cTnT)<5 ng/L 或<6 ng/L可用于排除急性心肌梗死。本研究的目的是确定在急诊室是否可以使用更高的 hs-cTnT 阈值来安全排除急性心肌梗死。方法。衍生队列由 24,973 名主诉胸痛的急诊科患者组成。在该队列中,我们确定了 0 h hs-cTnT 的最高浓度,该浓度对应于 30 天内急性心肌梗死/全因死亡主要终点和一年内全因死亡次要终点的阴性预测值 (NPV) ≥ 99.5%。在由 132,021 名和 1167 名急诊室胸痛患者组成的两个队列中对结果进行了验证。结果。与主要终点 NPV≥99.5% 相对应的 0 h hs-cTnT 阈值为 9 ng/L(NPV:99.6%,95% CI:99.5-99.7)。该临界值的灵敏度为 96.2%(95% CI:95.2-97.1),可将 59.7% 的患者确定为低风险,而 0 h hs-cTnT 为 5 ng/L 和 6 ng/L 的患者灵敏度分别为 35.8% 和 43.9%。在验证队列中的结果类似,在症状出现 3 小时后测量 0 hs-cTnT 的患者中,以及在非缺血性心电图和非高风险病史的患者中,结果似乎更好。结论9 纳克/升的 0 hs-cTnT 临界值可安全地排除大多数胸痛患者在 30 天内发生急性心肌梗死/死亡的可能性,是比目前推荐的 5 纳克/升和 6 纳克/升临界值更有效的策略。该试验已在 NCT03421873 上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信