Effect of the Incorporation of Recycled Aggregate from Construction and Demolition Waste on the Mechanical Strength of Silty-Cement Soil

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Monigleicia Alcalde Orioli, Weiner Gustavo Silva Costa, Tainá Silva Sá Britto, Jacqueline Cristina Patzsch, Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo
{"title":"Effect of the Incorporation of Recycled Aggregate from Construction and Demolition Waste on the Mechanical Strength of Silty-Cement Soil","authors":"Monigleicia Alcalde Orioli, Weiner Gustavo Silva Costa, Tainá Silva Sá Britto, Jacqueline Cristina Patzsch, Jair de Jesús Arrieta Baldovino, Ronaldo Luis dos Santos Izzo","doi":"10.1007/s40999-024-00951-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study aims to assess the effect of using recycled aggregates (RA) derived from construction and demolition waste (CDW) on the development of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of a silty-cement soil from the Guabirotuba Formation, located in the southern region of Brazil. Was considered the influence of various parameters, including RA content, compaction effort, maximum dry specific mass, and porosity/volume cement content (η/C<i>iv</i>). RA contents of 10%, 20%, and 30%, combined with 5% cement by dry soil weight, are studied at curing times of 0, 7, 14, and 28 days, using standard, intermediate, and modified compaction efforts. The results reveal that the addition of RA leads to an increase in the maximum dry specific mass, directly correlating with an increase in the rate of compressive strength gain over time. In the case of the modified compaction effort, the UCS value for the mixture with 30% RA at 28 days of curing reaches 2318 kPa, which is 35% higher compared to the mixture without RA, which has an RCS value of 1711 kPa. Equations establishing a relationship between η/C<i>iv</i> and UCS show that smaller η/C<i>iv</i> values result in greater UCS. Furthermore, a correlation between η/C<i>iv</i> and RA content with UCS suggests that η/C<i>iv</i> has a stronger influence on UCS than RA content. Lastly, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) indicates that incorporating 30% RA reduces the number of pores as well as their size, which enhances the soil structure and its increases stability, resulting in a more compact structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00951-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to assess the effect of using recycled aggregates (RA) derived from construction and demolition waste (CDW) on the development of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of a silty-cement soil from the Guabirotuba Formation, located in the southern region of Brazil. Was considered the influence of various parameters, including RA content, compaction effort, maximum dry specific mass, and porosity/volume cement content (η/Civ). RA contents of 10%, 20%, and 30%, combined with 5% cement by dry soil weight, are studied at curing times of 0, 7, 14, and 28 days, using standard, intermediate, and modified compaction efforts. The results reveal that the addition of RA leads to an increase in the maximum dry specific mass, directly correlating with an increase in the rate of compressive strength gain over time. In the case of the modified compaction effort, the UCS value for the mixture with 30% RA at 28 days of curing reaches 2318 kPa, which is 35% higher compared to the mixture without RA, which has an RCS value of 1711 kPa. Equations establishing a relationship between η/Civ and UCS show that smaller η/Civ values result in greater UCS. Furthermore, a correlation between η/Civ and RA content with UCS suggests that η/Civ has a stronger influence on UCS than RA content. Lastly, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) indicates that incorporating 30% RA reduces the number of pores as well as their size, which enhances the soil structure and its increases stability, resulting in a more compact structure.

Abstract Image

掺入从建筑和拆迁废物中提取的再生骨料对淤泥-水泥壤土机械强度的影响
本研究旨在评估使用从建筑和拆除废物(CDW)中提取的再生骨料(RA)对巴西南部地区瓜比罗图巴地层淤泥质水泥土壤无压抗压强度(UCS)的影响。研究考虑了各种参数的影响,包括 RA 含量、压实力度、最大干容重和孔隙率/体积水泥含量(η/Civ)。研究了在 0、7、14 和 28 天的固化时间内,使用标准、中间和改进的压实力度,RA 含量为 10%、20% 和 30%,水泥含量为干土重量的 5%。结果表明,添加 RA 会导致最大干比质量增加,这与抗压强度随时间增加的速度直接相关。在改进压实强度的情况下,含 30% RA 的混合物在养护 28 天时的 UCS 值达到 2318 kPa,与不含 RA 的混合物相比高出 35%,后者的 RCS 值为 1711 kPa。建立 η/Civ 和 UCS 之间关系的方程表明,η/Civ 值越小,UCS 越大。此外,η/Civ 和 RA 含量与 UCS 之间的相关性表明,η/Civ 比 RA 含量对 UCS 的影响更大。最后,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)表明,加入 30% 的 RA 可减少孔隙数量并减小孔隙大小,从而增强土壤结构并提高其稳定性,使结构更加紧凑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
15 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信