Quality of Care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium

Anna Galle, Silke D'hauwers, Helga Berghman, Nele Vaerewijck, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Ilaria Mariani, Arianna Bomben, Stefano delle Vedove, Marzia Lazzerini
{"title":"Quality of Care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium","authors":"Anna Galle, Silke D'hauwers, Helga Berghman, Nele Vaerewijck, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, Ilaria Mariani, Arianna Bomben, Stefano delle Vedove, Marzia Lazzerini","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.25.24304838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nTo examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time.\nDesign\nA cross-sectional observational study.\nSetting\nData of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium. Participants\nWomen giving birth in a Belgian facility from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2023, responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources, and organizational changes related to COVID 19. Primary and secondary outcome measures Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann Kendall test.\nResults\n897 women were included in the analysis, 67%(n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3%(n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth and 19.7%(n=177) with cesarean section. We found high QMNC scores but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0%(n=166) of women who experienced labor and 14.7%(n=26) of women with a cesarean reported inadequate pain relief; 64.7%(n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1%(n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9%(n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5%(n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1%(n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). The multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an instrumental vaginal birth. Over time there was a significant increase in QMNC score for experience of care and key organizational changes due to COVID-19. Conclusions and relevance\nAlthough overall QMNC scores were high, findings also suggest gaps in QMNC. Underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.","PeriodicalId":501409,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.24304838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time. Design A cross-sectional observational study. Setting Data of the IMAgiNE EURO study in Belgium. Participants Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from March 1, 2020, to May 1, 2023, responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources, and organizational changes related to COVID 19. Primary and secondary outcome measures Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann Kendall test. Results 897 women were included in the analysis, 67%(n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3%(n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth and 19.7%(n=177) with cesarean section. We found high QMNC scores but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0%(n=166) of women who experienced labor and 14.7%(n=26) of women with a cesarean reported inadequate pain relief; 64.7%(n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1%(n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9%(n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5%(n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1%(n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). The multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an instrumental vaginal birth. Over time there was a significant increase in QMNC score for experience of care and key organizational changes due to COVID-19. Conclusions and relevance Although overall QMNC scores were high, findings also suggest gaps in QMNC. Underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.
COVID-19 大流行期间的分娩护理质量:比利时 IMAgiNE EURO 研究结果
目标研究 COVID-19 大流行期间比利时医疗机构分娩前后的孕产妇和新生儿护理质量 (QMNC) 以及随时间变化的趋势。参与者 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 1 日期间,在比利时医疗机构分娩的妇女对一份经过验证的在线问卷进行了回答,该问卷基于 40 项基于世界卫生组织标准的质量测量,分为四个领域:提供护理、护理体验、资源可用性以及与 COVID 19 相关的组织变化。主要和次要结果测量 采用量值回归分析评估 QMNC 的预测因素;采用 Mann Kendall 检验测试随时间变化的趋势。结果 897 名产妇被纳入分析,67%(n=601)为自然阴道分娩,13.3%(n=119)为器械阴道分娩,19.7%(n=177)为剖宫产。我们发现 QMNC 得分较高,但在 QMNC 的所有领域都存在具体差距。在提供护理方面,21.0%(n=166)的产妇和 14.7%(n=26)的剖宫产产妇报告疼痛缓解不足;64.7%(n=74)的器械助产产妇报告宫底受压,72.3%(n=86)的产妇报告未经其同意使用产钳或真空吸盘。在护理体验方面,31.1%(n=279)的受访者表示沟通不畅,32.9%(n=295)的受访者表示没有参与选择,11.5%(n=104)的受访者表示没有得到有尊严的对待,8.1%(n=73)的受访者表示遭受过虐待。在资源方面,近一半的妇女报告称医护人员数量不足(46.2%,n=414)。多变量分析表明,经器械阴道分娩的产妇的 QMNC 分数明显较低。随着时间的推移,由于 COVID-19 的实施,护理经验和关键组织变化的 QMNC 得分明显增加。尽管 QMNC 总体得分较高,但研究结果也表明 QMNC 存在差距。应探讨造成这些差距的根本原因,以设计适当的干预措施和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信