A Three-Year Retrospective Review of Gynecologic Oncology Referrals to the Specialist Palliative Care Team in a Tertiary Referral Centre: Population, Characteristics, and Outcomes

Anthony J Goodings, Mila A Pastrak, Sten H Kajitani, Elaine Cunningham, Hannah O'Brien, Catherine Weadick, Karie Dennehy
{"title":"A Three-Year Retrospective Review of Gynecologic Oncology Referrals to the Specialist Palliative Care Team in a Tertiary Referral Centre: Population, Characteristics, and Outcomes","authors":"Anthony J Goodings, Mila A Pastrak, Sten H Kajitani, Elaine Cunningham, Hannah O'Brien, Catherine Weadick, Karie Dennehy","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.25.24304847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives\nThis study aims to characterize the patient population referred to the specialist palliative care service with a diagnosis of gynecological cancer. It also assesses referral frequency and response time in order to understand palliative care utilization in an acute hospital setting. Methods\nA retrospective chart review and database analysis was performed to extract data on demographics, cancer diagnoses, and referral reasons for patients referred to the specialist palliative care service over three years. The study focuses on identifying patterns in the characteristics of the referred patient population. Results\nAnalysis of 162 patients revealed a distribution across cancer subtypes: 62% ovarian, 22% endometrial, 12% cervical, and 4% vulvar. A notable finding was that the outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer were more likely to be discharged home with or without community care (61.8%) compared to those with endometrial cancer (41.0%). A rapid response to referrals was observed, with 70% reviewed within three days and 98% within a week. This highlights the service's efficiency and the demographic and diagnostic profile of the patient served. Significance of Results\nThis study gives insight into the demographic and diagnostic profiles of gynecological cancer patients referred for palliative care, alongside demonstrating rapid response to such referrals. Despite the rapid assessment times, the research importantly identifies differences in outcomes among different cancer subtypes, with a particular emphasis on the variance in discharge destinations. These findings reflect both patient preference and medical need, demonstrating the role of tailoring palliative care approaches to meet the individual needs and desires of this diverse patient population. Characterizing these patient profiles and outcomes serves as a crucial step in enhancing the effectiveness of palliative care strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of life for patients facing gynecological cancer.","PeriodicalId":501412,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.24304847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to characterize the patient population referred to the specialist palliative care service with a diagnosis of gynecological cancer. It also assesses referral frequency and response time in order to understand palliative care utilization in an acute hospital setting. Methods A retrospective chart review and database analysis was performed to extract data on demographics, cancer diagnoses, and referral reasons for patients referred to the specialist palliative care service over three years. The study focuses on identifying patterns in the characteristics of the referred patient population. Results Analysis of 162 patients revealed a distribution across cancer subtypes: 62% ovarian, 22% endometrial, 12% cervical, and 4% vulvar. A notable finding was that the outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer were more likely to be discharged home with or without community care (61.8%) compared to those with endometrial cancer (41.0%). A rapid response to referrals was observed, with 70% reviewed within three days and 98% within a week. This highlights the service's efficiency and the demographic and diagnostic profile of the patient served. Significance of Results This study gives insight into the demographic and diagnostic profiles of gynecological cancer patients referred for palliative care, alongside demonstrating rapid response to such referrals. Despite the rapid assessment times, the research importantly identifies differences in outcomes among different cancer subtypes, with a particular emphasis on the variance in discharge destinations. These findings reflect both patient preference and medical need, demonstrating the role of tailoring palliative care approaches to meet the individual needs and desires of this diverse patient population. Characterizing these patient profiles and outcomes serves as a crucial step in enhancing the effectiveness of palliative care strategies, with the ultimate goal of improving the quality of life for patients facing gynecological cancer.
一家三级转诊中心妇科肿瘤转诊至姑息治疗专家团队的三年回顾性研究:人群、特征和结果
研究目的 本研究旨在了解被转诊至专科姑息关怀服务的妇科癌症患者的特征。研究还评估了转诊频率和响应时间,以了解姑息关怀在急症医院环境中的使用情况。方法 通过回顾性病历和数据库分析,提取三年来转诊至姑息关怀专科的患者的人口统计学、癌症诊断和转诊原因等数据。研究的重点是确定转诊患者群体的特征模式。结果对162名患者进行分析后发现,他们分布在不同的癌症亚型中:62%为卵巢癌,22%为子宫内膜癌,12%为宫颈癌,4%为外阴癌。一个值得注意的发现是,与子宫内膜癌患者(41.0%)相比,卵巢癌患者更有可能在接受或不接受社区护理的情况下出院回家(61.8%)。转诊反应迅速,70%的病人在三天内得到复查,98%的病人在一周内得到复查。这凸显了该服务的效率以及所服务患者的人口统计学和诊断概况。研究结果的意义这项研究深入了解了转诊接受姑息治疗的妇科癌症患者的人口统计学和诊断学特征,同时还展示了对此类转诊的快速反应。尽管评估时间较短,但研究发现了不同癌症亚型在治疗结果上的差异,尤其强调了出院去向上的差异。这些研究结果反映了患者的偏好和医疗需求,证明了姑息关怀方法在满足不同患者个体需求和愿望方面的作用。描述这些患者的特征和结果是提高姑息治疗策略有效性的关键一步,其最终目标是改善妇科癌症患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信