Similar effect of lidocaine and saline on ciliary beating of nasal epithelial cells in vitro

Sibel T Savas, Stefan A. Tschanz, Philipp Latzin, Carmen Casaulta, Loretta Muller
{"title":"Similar effect of lidocaine and saline on ciliary beating of nasal epithelial cells in vitro","authors":"Sibel T Savas, Stefan A. Tschanz, Philipp Latzin, Carmen Casaulta, Loretta Muller","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.25.24304837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Primary ciliary dyskinesia is a rare genetic disease affecting ciliary motility and causing respiratory symptoms. Diagnosis can be done by high-speed-videomicroscopy using nasal epithelial cells (NECs) obtained via brushings. This procedure can be painful, especially for children. The use of lidocaine is proposed to reduce this pain; however, it is not clear whether lidocaine changes ciliary beating frequency (CBF) or pattern (CBP) in the subsequent high-speed-videomicroscopy.\nObjective: The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of lidocaine on the CBF and the CBP of differentiated, air-liquid-interface cultured NECs.\nMethods: NECs from healthy volunteers were obtained via brushings and cultured at the air-liquid-interface. After differentiation, lidocaine or isotonic saline (IS, control) were added apically for 1 or 5 min each and CBF (in top view of whole inserts and side views of scratched cells) and CBP (only side view) were assessed and recorded up to 150 min. CBF was computed and CBP was analysed semiquantitatively.\nResults: Lidocaine as well as IS increased the CBF in the top view approach significantly compared to baseline. However, we found no significant differences between lidocaine and IS (control) treatment. Additionally, no effect of lidocaine on CBF, CBP, amplitude, inter- and intracellular coordination or transport was seen in the side view approach.\nConclusion: We conclude that the observed CBF increase is related to the addition of liquid on the mucus layer and not by the lidocaine itself. Therefore, it seems possible to use lidocaine for nasal analgesia without impact on subsequent analysis of the ciliary motility.","PeriodicalId":501074,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","volume":"273 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.24304837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Primary ciliary dyskinesia is a rare genetic disease affecting ciliary motility and causing respiratory symptoms. Diagnosis can be done by high-speed-videomicroscopy using nasal epithelial cells (NECs) obtained via brushings. This procedure can be painful, especially for children. The use of lidocaine is proposed to reduce this pain; however, it is not clear whether lidocaine changes ciliary beating frequency (CBF) or pattern (CBP) in the subsequent high-speed-videomicroscopy. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of lidocaine on the CBF and the CBP of differentiated, air-liquid-interface cultured NECs. Methods: NECs from healthy volunteers were obtained via brushings and cultured at the air-liquid-interface. After differentiation, lidocaine or isotonic saline (IS, control) were added apically for 1 or 5 min each and CBF (in top view of whole inserts and side views of scratched cells) and CBP (only side view) were assessed and recorded up to 150 min. CBF was computed and CBP was analysed semiquantitatively. Results: Lidocaine as well as IS increased the CBF in the top view approach significantly compared to baseline. However, we found no significant differences between lidocaine and IS (control) treatment. Additionally, no effect of lidocaine on CBF, CBP, amplitude, inter- and intracellular coordination or transport was seen in the side view approach. Conclusion: We conclude that the observed CBF increase is related to the addition of liquid on the mucus layer and not by the lidocaine itself. Therefore, it seems possible to use lidocaine for nasal analgesia without impact on subsequent analysis of the ciliary motility.
利多卡因和生理盐水对体外鼻腔上皮细胞纤毛跳动的影响相似
理由原发性睫状肌运动障碍是一种影响睫状肌运动并导致呼吸道症状的罕见遗传病。可通过刷取鼻腔上皮细胞(NECs),使用高速视频显微镜进行诊断。这一过程可能很痛苦,尤其是对儿童而言。有人建议使用利多卡因来减轻这种疼痛;但利多卡因是否会改变随后高速视频显微镜检查中的纤毛跳动频率(CBF)或模式(CBP),目前尚不清楚:本研究旨在分析利多卡因对已分化的气液界面培养 NECs 的 CBF 和 CBP 的影响:方法:通过刷取健康志愿者的NECs并在气液界面培养。分化后,在顶部加入利多卡因或等渗生理盐水(IS,对照组)各1或5分钟,评估并记录CBF(整个插入细胞的俯视图和划痕细胞的侧视图)和CBP(仅侧视图),直至150分钟。对 CBF 进行计算,对 CBP 进行半定量分析:结果:与基线相比,利多卡因和 IS 能显著增加俯视法的 CBF。然而,我们发现利多卡因和 IS(对照组)治疗之间没有明显差异。此外,在侧视方法中,利多卡因对 CBF、CBP、振幅、细胞间和细胞内协调或转运均无影响:我们的结论是,观察到的 CBF 增加与粘液层上添加的液体有关,而与利多卡因本身无关。因此,使用利多卡因进行鼻腔镇痛似乎不会影响随后的睫状肌运动分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信