Global, Regional, and National Survey on Burden and Quality of Care Index (QCI) of Orofacial Clefts: Global Burden of Disease Systematic Analysis 1990-2019

Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Erfan Shamsoddin, Sahar Khademioore, Yeganeh Khazaei, Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone
{"title":"Global, Regional, and National Survey on Burden and Quality of Care Index (QCI) of Orofacial Clefts: Global Burden of Disease Systematic Analysis 1990-2019","authors":"Ahmad Sofi-Mahmudi, Erfan Shamsoddin, Sahar Khademioore, Yeganeh Khazaei, Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.24.24304795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial anomalies that include a variety of conditions affecting the lips and oral cavity. They remain a significant global public health challenge. Despite this, the quality of care for orofacial clefts has not been investigated at global and country levels.\nObjective: We aimed to measure the quality of care index (QCI) for orofacial clefts worldwide.\nMethods: We used the 2019 Global Burden of Disease data to create a multifactorial index (QCI) to assess orofacial clefts globally and nationally. By utilizing data on incidence, prevalence, years of life lost, and years lived with disability, we defined four ratios aimed at indirectly reflecting the quality of healthcare. Subsequently, we conducted a principal component analysis to identify the most critical variables that could account for the observed variability. The outcome of this analysis was defined as the QCI for orofacial clefts. Following this, we tracked the QCI trends among males and females worldwide, across various regions and countries, considering factors such as the socio-demographic index and World Bank classifications. Results: Globally, the QCI for orofacial clefts exhibited a consistent upward trend from 1990 to 2019 (66.4 to 90.2) overall and for females (82.9 to 94.3) and males (72.8 to 93.6). In the year 2019, the top five countries with the highest QCI scores were as follows: Norway (QCI=99.9), Ireland (99.4), France (99.4), Germany (99.3), the Netherlands (99.3), and Malta (99.3). Conversely, the five countries with the lowest QCI scores on a global scale in 2019 were Somalia (59.1), Niger (67.6), Burkina Faso (72.6), Ethiopia (73.0), and Mali (74.4). Gender difference showed a converging trend from 1990 to 2019 (optimize gender disparity ratio (GDR): 123 vs. 163 countries), and the GDR showed a move toward optimization (between 0.95 and 1.05) in the better and worse parts of the world. Conclusion: Despite the positive results regarding the QCI for orofacial clefts worldwide, some countries showed a slight negative trend.","PeriodicalId":501363,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Dentistry and Oral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Dentistry and Oral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.24.24304795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orofacial clefts are the most common craniofacial anomalies that include a variety of conditions affecting the lips and oral cavity. They remain a significant global public health challenge. Despite this, the quality of care for orofacial clefts has not been investigated at global and country levels. Objective: We aimed to measure the quality of care index (QCI) for orofacial clefts worldwide. Methods: We used the 2019 Global Burden of Disease data to create a multifactorial index (QCI) to assess orofacial clefts globally and nationally. By utilizing data on incidence, prevalence, years of life lost, and years lived with disability, we defined four ratios aimed at indirectly reflecting the quality of healthcare. Subsequently, we conducted a principal component analysis to identify the most critical variables that could account for the observed variability. The outcome of this analysis was defined as the QCI for orofacial clefts. Following this, we tracked the QCI trends among males and females worldwide, across various regions and countries, considering factors such as the socio-demographic index and World Bank classifications. Results: Globally, the QCI for orofacial clefts exhibited a consistent upward trend from 1990 to 2019 (66.4 to 90.2) overall and for females (82.9 to 94.3) and males (72.8 to 93.6). In the year 2019, the top five countries with the highest QCI scores were as follows: Norway (QCI=99.9), Ireland (99.4), France (99.4), Germany (99.3), the Netherlands (99.3), and Malta (99.3). Conversely, the five countries with the lowest QCI scores on a global scale in 2019 were Somalia (59.1), Niger (67.6), Burkina Faso (72.6), Ethiopia (73.0), and Mali (74.4). Gender difference showed a converging trend from 1990 to 2019 (optimize gender disparity ratio (GDR): 123 vs. 163 countries), and the GDR showed a move toward optimization (between 0.95 and 1.05) in the better and worse parts of the world. Conclusion: Despite the positive results regarding the QCI for orofacial clefts worldwide, some countries showed a slight negative trend.
全球、地区和国家口面裂负担和护理质量指数 (QCI) 调查:1990-2019 年全球疾病负担系统分析
背景:口唇裂是最常见的颅面畸形,包括影响嘴唇和口腔的各种情况。它们仍然是全球公共卫生面临的重大挑战。尽管如此,口面裂的护理质量尚未在全球和国家层面进行调查:我们旨在衡量全球口面裂护理质量指数(QCI):我们利用 2019 年全球疾病负担数据创建了一个多因素指数(QCI),用于评估全球和各国的口面裂情况。通过利用发病率、流行率、生命损失年数和残疾生活年数的数据,我们定义了四个比率,旨在间接反映医疗质量。随后,我们进行了主成分分析,以确定能够解释观察到的变异性的最关键变量。这项分析的结果被定义为口腔裂隙的 QCI。随后,我们考虑到社会人口指数和世界银行分类等因素,跟踪了全球不同地区和国家男性和女性的 QCI 趋势。结果:在全球范围内,口面裂的 QCI 从 1990 年到 2019 年呈持续上升趋势(66.4 升至 90.2),女性(82.9 升至 94.3)和男性(72.8 升至 93.6)的 QCI 也呈持续上升趋势。2019 年,QCI 分数最高的前五个国家如下:挪威(QCI=99.9)、爱尔兰(99.4)、法国(99.4)、德国(99.3)、荷兰(99.3)和马耳他(99.3)。相反,2019 年全球范围内 QCI 分数最低的五个国家是索马里(59.1)、尼日尔(67.6)、布基纳法索(72.6)、埃塞俄比亚(73.0)和马里(74.4)。从 1990 年到 2019 年,性别差异呈收敛趋势(优化性别差异比(GDR):123 个国家对 163 个国家),性别差异比在世界较好和较差地区均呈优化趋势(介于 0.95 和 1.05 之间)。结论尽管全球口面裂的 QCI 结果是积极的,但一些国家还是出现了轻微的消极趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信