Egyptian urinary stones in the COVID-19 outbreak: a multi-center study

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sameh kotb, Mohamed Ezzat, Mohamed Galal Elsheikh, Galal Mohamed Elshorbagy
{"title":"Egyptian urinary stones in the COVID-19 outbreak: a multi-center study","authors":"Sameh kotb, Mohamed Ezzat, Mohamed Galal Elsheikh, Galal Mohamed Elshorbagy","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00420-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urolithiasis is a unique disease that can cause emergencies and can impair kidney function over time, especially if infections overlap. This work aimed to compare urolithiasis in the pre- and post-pandemic era and to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient preferences and decision-making for symptomatic urolithiasis and consequently complications. This case–control multi-center study was conducted at the Urology Department of two tertiary centers in XXX. Participants were divided into two groups: group A: patients who had urolithiasis from March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period), and group B: patients who had urolithiasis from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022 (during COVID-19 period). Group A had a significantly higher incidence of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without double J stenting (DJ), nephrolithotomy + pyelolithotomy and total PCNL compared to group B which had a lower incidence of URS without DJ and total URS. The operation was delayed among 72 (15.9%) patients during the pandemic. In total, 116 (25.6%) were subjected to previous stone removal surgery. In total, 59 (13%) of patients had COVID-19 infection before stone diagnosis. One hundred thirty-two patients (29.1%) were on vitamin C. The presence of positive family history was statistically significant in patients who underwent ESWL in comparison with patients who underwent endoscopy or surgery (P = 0.03). COVID-19 significantly impacted endourological services for urinary stones in terms of surgical volume and case complexity.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00420-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urolithiasis is a unique disease that can cause emergencies and can impair kidney function over time, especially if infections overlap. This work aimed to compare urolithiasis in the pre- and post-pandemic era and to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient preferences and decision-making for symptomatic urolithiasis and consequently complications. This case–control multi-center study was conducted at the Urology Department of two tertiary centers in XXX. Participants were divided into two groups: group A: patients who had urolithiasis from March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period), and group B: patients who had urolithiasis from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2022 (during COVID-19 period). Group A had a significantly higher incidence of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without double J stenting (DJ), nephrolithotomy + pyelolithotomy and total PCNL compared to group B which had a lower incidence of URS without DJ and total URS. The operation was delayed among 72 (15.9%) patients during the pandemic. In total, 116 (25.6%) were subjected to previous stone removal surgery. In total, 59 (13%) of patients had COVID-19 infection before stone diagnosis. One hundred thirty-two patients (29.1%) were on vitamin C. The presence of positive family history was statistically significant in patients who underwent ESWL in comparison with patients who underwent endoscopy or surgery (P = 0.03). COVID-19 significantly impacted endourological services for urinary stones in terms of surgical volume and case complexity.
COVID-19疫情中的埃及泌尿系统结石:一项多中心研究
尿路结石是一种独特的疾病,可引起急症,并可长期损害肾功能,尤其是在感染重叠的情况下。这项研究旨在比较大流行前后的尿路结石,并研究 COVID-19 大流行对患者偏好的影响以及对无症状尿路结石及其并发症的决策。这项病例对照多中心研究在 XXX 两家三级医院的泌尿科进行。参与者分为两组:A 组:2018 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日(COVID-19 前期间)的尿路结石患者;B 组:2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 28 日(COVID-19 期间)的尿路结石患者。与 B 组相比,A 组经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)(不含双 J 支架置入术(DJ))、肾镜取石术+肾盂取石术和全 PCNL 的发生率明显更高,而 B 组经皮肾镜取石术(URS)(不含 DJ)和全 URS 的发生率较低。在大流行期间,有 72 名(15.9%)患者推迟了手术。共有 116 名(25.6%)患者曾接受过结石清除手术。共有 59 名患者(13%)在确诊结石前感染了 COVID-19。132名患者(29.1%)服用过维生素C。与接受内窥镜检查或手术的患者相比,接受ESWL治疗的患者中存在阳性家族史的比例具有统计学意义(P = 0.03)。从手术量和病例复杂程度来看,COVID-19 对泌尿系结石的腔内放射学服务产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信