Design and validation of an instrument to evaluate the workgroup methodology in university students

Q1 Social Sciences
António Costa , Florbela Rodrigues , Rui Pitarma , Maria Eduarda Ferreira
{"title":"Design and validation of an instrument to evaluate the workgroup methodology in university students","authors":"António Costa ,&nbsp;Florbela Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Rui Pitarma ,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Ferreira","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Workgroup methodology is often used to promote curricular learning. However, the intentionality in choosing a teaching strategy only sometimes has the best achievement in learning. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument (questionnaire) that is easy to apply and allows the professor to evaluate the effectiveness of the workgroup in learning (curricular) development. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and three constructs were extracted: <em>Practice, Motivation</em> and <em>Effectiveness</em>. The correlation between the constructs indicates a good relationship and dependence between them. The results show that the instrument is valid and reliable, proving that it could be an essential tool to ascertain whether students see workgroup as a factor that promotes their learning and thus allow the professor to monitor and assess this method´s effectiveness in their teaching strategy. This study leads us to consider developing questionnaires to assess students' perceptions of other teaching–learning methodologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000335/pdfft?md5=6eabf758912890e89da7736c4e629a5d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000335-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workgroup methodology is often used to promote curricular learning. However, the intentionality in choosing a teaching strategy only sometimes has the best achievement in learning. This study aims to develop and validate an instrument (questionnaire) that is easy to apply and allows the professor to evaluate the effectiveness of the workgroup in learning (curricular) development. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted and three constructs were extracted: Practice, Motivation and Effectiveness. The correlation between the constructs indicates a good relationship and dependence between them. The results show that the instrument is valid and reliable, proving that it could be an essential tool to ascertain whether students see workgroup as a factor that promotes their learning and thus allow the professor to monitor and assess this method´s effectiveness in their teaching strategy. This study leads us to consider developing questionnaires to assess students' perceptions of other teaching–learning methodologies.

设计和验证评估大学生工作组方法的工具
工作组教学法经常被用来促进课程学习。然而,在选择教学策略时的用心,有时只能取得最佳的学习效果。本研究旨在开发和验证一种易于应用的工具(问卷),使教授能够评估工作组在学习(课程)发展中的有效性。研究进行了探索性因素分析,并提取了三个结构:实践、动机和效果。这些构念之间的相关性表明它们之间存在良好的关系和依赖性。结果表明,该工具是有效和可靠的,证明它可以作为一种重要工具,用于确定学生是否将工作组视为促进其学习的一个因素,从而使教授能够监测和评估这种方法在其教学策略中的有效性。这项研究促使我们考虑编制问卷,以评估学生对其他教学方法的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信