Combating domestic violence in West Bengal, India: Gendered norms and legal regulations

Q1 Social Sciences
Nandita Banerjee Dhawan , Harshita Bhasin
{"title":"Combating domestic violence in West Bengal, India: Gendered norms and legal regulations","authors":"Nandita Banerjee Dhawan ,&nbsp;Harshita Bhasin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Domestic violence has long been a major concern for women's organisations globally. Despite decades of progressive legislation in India since the 1980s, this paper underscores the persistent and structural nature of domestic violence, which afflicts lives across gender identities. The study draws on findings from a survey of 2193 aggrieved women and select case studies across 13 districts of West Bengal who have accessed the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), a civil law enacted in 2005 to give protection to victim-survivors from domestic violence (as opposed to punishing the perpetrators). The paper argues that even ‘radical’ legislation such as the PWDVA helps survivors manage and endure violence rather than eliminate it from their lives. In doing so, the legislation offers a coping strategy to the aggrieved rather than a means through which deep-seated social structures of patriarchy that perpetuate domestic violence can be challenged to ensure gender justice. Our study indicates that there is a greater degree of precarity among women survivors with psycho-social disabilities and members of gender-sexual minorities. The majority of actors in the socio-legal ecosystem who should be upholding survivors’ right to live a life free from violence instead place them primarily in the heterosexual patriarchal family. The feminist vision behind the enactment of PWDVA, which valued the assertion of a survivor's rights as a citizen of a democratic country to lead a life free from violence, is eschewed in favour of preserving the institution of family and marriage over gender justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000347/pdfft?md5=19e9077ab759d377ad640bd20d3fe22a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000347-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domestic violence has long been a major concern for women's organisations globally. Despite decades of progressive legislation in India since the 1980s, this paper underscores the persistent and structural nature of domestic violence, which afflicts lives across gender identities. The study draws on findings from a survey of 2193 aggrieved women and select case studies across 13 districts of West Bengal who have accessed the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), a civil law enacted in 2005 to give protection to victim-survivors from domestic violence (as opposed to punishing the perpetrators). The paper argues that even ‘radical’ legislation such as the PWDVA helps survivors manage and endure violence rather than eliminate it from their lives. In doing so, the legislation offers a coping strategy to the aggrieved rather than a means through which deep-seated social structures of patriarchy that perpetuate domestic violence can be challenged to ensure gender justice. Our study indicates that there is a greater degree of precarity among women survivors with psycho-social disabilities and members of gender-sexual minorities. The majority of actors in the socio-legal ecosystem who should be upholding survivors’ right to live a life free from violence instead place them primarily in the heterosexual patriarchal family. The feminist vision behind the enactment of PWDVA, which valued the assertion of a survivor's rights as a citizen of a democratic country to lead a life free from violence, is eschewed in favour of preserving the institution of family and marriage over gender justice.

打击印度西孟加拉邦的家庭暴力:性别规范和法律条例
长期以来,家庭暴力一直是全球妇女组织关注的主要问题。尽管自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,印度已逐步立法数十年,但本文强调了家庭暴力的持久性和结构性,它影响着不同性别身份的人的生活。本研究借鉴了对西孟加拉邦 13 个县 2193 名受害妇女的调查结果和部分案例研究,这些妇女都使用了《保护妇女免受家庭暴力法》(PWDVA),该法于 2005 年颁布,是一部旨在保护家庭暴力受害者-幸存者(而非惩罚施暴者)的民事法律。本文认为,即使像《防止家庭暴力法》这样 "激进 "的立法也只是帮助幸存者管理和忍受暴力,而不是将其从生活中消除。这样一来,立法为受害者提供的是一种应对策略,而不是一种手段,通过这种手段,可以挑战使家庭暴力长期存在的根深蒂固的父权制社会结构,从而确保性别公正。我们的研究表明,有心理社会残疾的女性幸存者和性别-性少数群体成员的不稳定程度更高。社会法律生态系统中的大多数参与者本应维护幸存者免受暴力侵害的权利,但他们却将幸存者主要置于异性恋父权制家庭中。颁布《残疾人福祉法》背后的女权主义愿景重视维护幸存者作为民主国家公民的权利,使其过上免受暴力侵害的生活,但这一愿景却因维护家庭和婚姻制度而被摒弃,而不是性别公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信