Variation in traffic injury settings—same implication of hospital and police-based traffic injury data?

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristian Kjærgaard , Jens Lauritsen
{"title":"Variation in traffic injury settings—same implication of hospital and police-based traffic injury data?","authors":"Kristian Kjærgaard ,&nbsp;Jens Lauritsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Injury and death from traffic incidents are still a major global concern and are associated with significant costs. Traffic incidents are preventable, but this requires planning based on accurate and complete injury data, otherwise efforts bypass targets.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objective was to compare the agreement between hospital and police records for parameters independently recorded by both datasets and to report the most frequent traffic incident setting reported by either dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed routinely collected hospital records from Odense University Hospital, Denmark, for traffic injuries from 2015 to 2021. These include patient demographics and incident-related data (time and place of incident, road users involved, and collision mode) for all patients involved in traffic incidents. These injuries were then linked with police records from Funen Police District, which covers the same geographical area of the island Funen, Denmark.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 21,562 road users were injured and subsequently treated at the hospital, and 5176 (24.0%) of these suffered from severe injury.</p><p>The agreement between hospital and police records was for means of transport (passenger car/bicycle/moped/pedestrian/motorcycle) 93.9% [95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 94.9%], role (driver/passenger/pedestrian) 97.7% [97.1%, 98.3%], and use of seat belt/helmet 76.9% [75.2%, 78.6%]. The accuracy of police severity classification was 50.5% [47.0%, 54.0%], and the completeness of police-reported severe incidents was just 15.1% [14.1%, 16.0%] compared with hospital records.</p><p>The top-5 hospital-reported severe traffic incident setting was an injured cyclist with no counterpart on a city road (n = 1130), and 4 of 5 in this top-5 involved an injured cyclist.</p><p>The top-5 police-reported severe traffic incident setting was an injured cyclist with a passenger car counterpart on a city road (n = 116), and the remaining 4 in this top-5 involved an injured passenger car driver. Only one setting overlapped between hospital- and police-reported top-5 severe injury scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study showed an extraordinarily high agreement between parameters independently recorded by hospital and police records, but police records misclassify severity and is not a reliable source for severe injuries.</p><p>Thus, road safety policies may not have the intended effect if preventive efforts are based solely on police-reported severe injuries. With the documented agreement on means of transport, role, and use of safety equipment we suggest that planning of preventive efforts is based on hospital records in areas where registration practices are sufficiently thorough supplemented by police data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000288/pdfft?md5=22ab5efaf82833e3e867e2e632978059&pid=1-s2.0-S2214140524000288-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524000288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Injury and death from traffic incidents are still a major global concern and are associated with significant costs. Traffic incidents are preventable, but this requires planning based on accurate and complete injury data, otherwise efforts bypass targets.

Objectives

The objective was to compare the agreement between hospital and police records for parameters independently recorded by both datasets and to report the most frequent traffic incident setting reported by either dataset.

Methods

We analyzed routinely collected hospital records from Odense University Hospital, Denmark, for traffic injuries from 2015 to 2021. These include patient demographics and incident-related data (time and place of incident, road users involved, and collision mode) for all patients involved in traffic incidents. These injuries were then linked with police records from Funen Police District, which covers the same geographical area of the island Funen, Denmark.

Results

In total, 21,562 road users were injured and subsequently treated at the hospital, and 5176 (24.0%) of these suffered from severe injury.

The agreement between hospital and police records was for means of transport (passenger car/bicycle/moped/pedestrian/motorcycle) 93.9% [95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 94.9%], role (driver/passenger/pedestrian) 97.7% [97.1%, 98.3%], and use of seat belt/helmet 76.9% [75.2%, 78.6%]. The accuracy of police severity classification was 50.5% [47.0%, 54.0%], and the completeness of police-reported severe incidents was just 15.1% [14.1%, 16.0%] compared with hospital records.

The top-5 hospital-reported severe traffic incident setting was an injured cyclist with no counterpart on a city road (n = 1130), and 4 of 5 in this top-5 involved an injured cyclist.

The top-5 police-reported severe traffic incident setting was an injured cyclist with a passenger car counterpart on a city road (n = 116), and the remaining 4 in this top-5 involved an injured passenger car driver. Only one setting overlapped between hospital- and police-reported top-5 severe injury scenarios.

Conclusion

This study showed an extraordinarily high agreement between parameters independently recorded by hospital and police records, but police records misclassify severity and is not a reliable source for severe injuries.

Thus, road safety policies may not have the intended effect if preventive efforts are based solely on police-reported severe injuries. With the documented agreement on means of transport, role, and use of safety equipment we suggest that planning of preventive efforts is based on hospital records in areas where registration practices are sufficiently thorough supplemented by police data.

Abstract Image

交通事故受伤环境的差异--医院和警方交通事故受伤数据的影响相同吗?
导言交通事故造成的伤害和死亡仍然是全球关注的一个主要问题,并造成巨大损失。交通事故是可以预防的,但这需要基于准确、完整的伤害数据进行规划,否则就会绕过目标。方法我们分析了丹麦欧登塞大学医院例行收集的 2015 年至 2021 年交通伤害的医院记录。这些记录包括所有交通事故患者的人口统计数据和事故相关数据(事故发生的时间和地点、涉及的道路使用者和碰撞方式)。结果共有 21562 名道路使用者受伤,随后在医院接受了治疗,其中 5176 人(24.0%)伤势严重。医院和警方记录的一致率为:交通工具(客车/自行车/轻便摩托车/行人/摩托车)93.9% [95% 置信区间:93.0%, 94.9%]、角色(司机/乘客/行人)97.7% [97.1%, 98.3%]、使用安全带/头盔76.9% [75.2%, 78.6%]。与医院记录相比,警方严重程度分类的准确率为 50.5% [47.0%, 54.0%],而警方报告的严重事故的完整率仅为 15.1% [14.1%, 16.0%]。医院报告的严重交通事故中,排名前五位的是受伤的骑自行车者,而城市道路上没有相应的严重交通事故(n = 1130),排名前五位的五起严重交通事故中有四起涉及受伤的骑自行车者。在警方报告的严重交通事故中,排名前 5 位的是在城市道路上有乘用车同行的受伤骑车人(n = 116),而在这前 5 位中,其余 4 位均涉及受伤的乘用车驾驶员。结论这项研究表明,医院和警方独立记录的参数之间具有极高的一致性,但警方记录对严重程度进行了错误分类,因此并不是严重伤害的可靠来源。由于在交通工具、角色和安全设备的使用等方面存在有据可查的一致意见,我们建议,在登记工作足够彻底的地区,预防工作的规划应以医院记录为基础,辅以警方数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信