Ph. Eur. testing for histamine and depressor substances using guinea-pigs and cats: the end of an era. Strategy for removal of animal tests for histamine and depressor substances and their vestiges from the Ph. Eur.

Q4 Medicine
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2024-01-01
M Bratos, O Kolaj-Robin, M Antoni, E Charton
{"title":"Ph. Eur. testing for histamine and depressor substances using guinea-pigs and cats: the end of an era. Strategy for removal of animal tests for histamine and depressor substances and their vestiges from the Ph. Eur.","authors":"M Bratos, O Kolaj-Robin, M Antoni, E Charton","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For more than 50 years, <i>in vivo</i> assays have been used for testing pharmaceutical product safety due to their assumed ability to broadly detect potential unidentified contaminants. As part of these in vivo tests, the animal tests for depressor substances and histamine have been described in the European Pharmacopoeia since its first edition in 1977. Both tests measure the effect of histamine and histamine-like substances, using guinea-pigs and cats respectively. In 2024, the <i>Histamine (2.6.10)</i> general chapter is referenced in the Production section of four monographs and 10 monographs have variations of a sentence on designing the manufacturing process to eliminate or minimise substances lowering blood pressure in this same section, without referencing the chapter. The <i>Depressor substances (2.6.11)</i> chapter is referenced only in the <i>Histamine (2.6.10)</i> chapter as a next step if the histamine test is invalid. A historical search was performed and it has shown that the tests for histamine and for depressor substances were introduced by different groups of experts in an inconsistent way at different times, and for different reasons, leading to non-harmonised approaches across monographs. The control of histamine and other depressor substances has been the subject of numerous debates where their use was questioned. During these discussions, reports on positive cases or batches failing the test for histamine or depressor substances were anecdotal. In addition, in vivo tests can be considered non-specific, very variable, time-consuming, costly and ethically doubtful. More importantly, the majority of in vivo methods originate from a time when good manufacturing practice was not widely used and formal method validation requirements were not yet established. In view of the above, the removal of all references to animal tests for histamine or depressor substances from all texts still referring to them is proposed. Since the sentences in the Production section referring to the control of \"substances lowering blood pressure\", \"vasoactive substances\" or \"hypotensive substances\" appeared as remainders of the animal test without further guarantee of safety, it will also be proposed to remove all these sentences from the concerned monographs. Ultimately, the suppression of general chapters <i>2.6.10</i> and <i>2.6.11</i> from the Ph. Eur. is envisaged. Independently from the above, it is also envisaged to elaborate a new general chapter <i>Histamine in active substances (2.5.47)</i> to include physicochemical or immunochemical methods enabling the detection of histamine. This new text would aim at supporting manufacturers in their histamine control strategy following the inclusion of precaution statements in the general monograph on <i>Products of fermentation (1468)</i>; these statements had been added in Ph. Eur. Supplements 9.6 and 10.4, following adverse events related to a GMP issue with gentamicin sulfate. This strategy has been endorsed by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its 177<sup>th</sup> Session in November 2023. The concerned monographs would be a subject of public consultation in Pharmeuropa 36.2 (April 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"12-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For more than 50 years, in vivo assays have been used for testing pharmaceutical product safety due to their assumed ability to broadly detect potential unidentified contaminants. As part of these in vivo tests, the animal tests for depressor substances and histamine have been described in the European Pharmacopoeia since its first edition in 1977. Both tests measure the effect of histamine and histamine-like substances, using guinea-pigs and cats respectively. In 2024, the Histamine (2.6.10) general chapter is referenced in the Production section of four monographs and 10 monographs have variations of a sentence on designing the manufacturing process to eliminate or minimise substances lowering blood pressure in this same section, without referencing the chapter. The Depressor substances (2.6.11) chapter is referenced only in the Histamine (2.6.10) chapter as a next step if the histamine test is invalid. A historical search was performed and it has shown that the tests for histamine and for depressor substances were introduced by different groups of experts in an inconsistent way at different times, and for different reasons, leading to non-harmonised approaches across monographs. The control of histamine and other depressor substances has been the subject of numerous debates where their use was questioned. During these discussions, reports on positive cases or batches failing the test for histamine or depressor substances were anecdotal. In addition, in vivo tests can be considered non-specific, very variable, time-consuming, costly and ethically doubtful. More importantly, the majority of in vivo methods originate from a time when good manufacturing practice was not widely used and formal method validation requirements were not yet established. In view of the above, the removal of all references to animal tests for histamine or depressor substances from all texts still referring to them is proposed. Since the sentences in the Production section referring to the control of "substances lowering blood pressure", "vasoactive substances" or "hypotensive substances" appeared as remainders of the animal test without further guarantee of safety, it will also be proposed to remove all these sentences from the concerned monographs. Ultimately, the suppression of general chapters 2.6.10 and 2.6.11 from the Ph. Eur. is envisaged. Independently from the above, it is also envisaged to elaborate a new general chapter Histamine in active substances (2.5.47) to include physicochemical or immunochemical methods enabling the detection of histamine. This new text would aim at supporting manufacturers in their histamine control strategy following the inclusion of precaution statements in the general monograph on Products of fermentation (1468); these statements had been added in Ph. Eur. Supplements 9.6 and 10.4, following adverse events related to a GMP issue with gentamicin sulfate. This strategy has been endorsed by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission at its 177th Session in November 2023. The concerned monographs would be a subject of public consultation in Pharmeuropa 36.2 (April 2024).

欧洲药典》使用豚鼠和猫进行组胺和抑制剂测试:一个时代的终结。从欧洲药典中删除组胺和抑制物质动物试验及其残留物的战略。
50 多年来,体内试验一直被用于检测医药产品的安全性,因为它们具有广泛检测潜在不明污染物的能力。作为这些体内试验的一部分,《欧洲药典》自 1977 年第一版以来就一直在介绍抑制物质和组胺的动物试验。这两项试验分别使用豚鼠和猫来测量组胺和组胺样物质的作用。在 2024 年,有四部各论的生产部分引用了组胺(2.6.10)总章,有十部各论在同一 部分中使用了不同的句子来设计生产过程,以消除或尽量减少降低血压的物质,但没有 引用该章。降压物质(2.6.11)一章仅在组胺(2.6.10)一章中提及,作为组胺试验无效时的下一步骤。我们进行了历史检索,结果表明,组胺和抑制物质的检测方法是由不同的专家小组在不同的时间、出于不同的原因以不一致的方式引入的,这导致了各专著的检测方法不统一。对组胺和其他抑制物质的控制一直是众多辩论的主题,其使用受到质疑。在这些讨论中,有关组胺或抑制物质检测呈阳性或不合格批次的报告都是传闻。此外,活体检测还可能被认为是非特异性的、多变的、耗时的、昂贵的和道德上有疑问的。更重要的是,大多数体内检测方法都是在良好生产规范尚未广泛应用、正式方法验证要求尚未确立的情况下产生的。有鉴于此,建议从所有仍提及组胺或抑制剂物质的文本中删除所有有关动物试验的内容。由于 "生产 "部分中提到的 "降血压物质"、"血管活性物质 "或 "降压物质 "的控制句子是动物试验的残留物,没有进一步的安全保证,因此也建议从相关各论中删除所有这些句子。最终,将取消《欧洲药典》总第 2.6.10 和 2.6.11 章。除上述内容外,还设想拟定新的总则 "活性物质中的组胺"(2.5.47),以包括检测组胺 的物理化学或免疫化学方法。在《发酵产品》(1468)的总论中纳入预防说明后,这一新文本将旨在支持生产商的组胺控制策略;这些说明已在《欧洲药典》(Ph. Eur. Supplements)第 9.6 和 10.6 版中添加。在发生与硫酸庆大霉素的 GMP 问题相关的不良事件后,《欧洲药典》在补编 9.6 和 10.4 中增加了这些声明。欧洲药典委员会在 2023 年 11 月召开的第 177 届会议上批准了这一战略。相关各论将在 Pharmeuropa 36.2(2024 年 4 月)中进行公众咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信