The Effect of Supine Versus Upright Positioning on Eyelid Height in the Nonsurgical Patient.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Garrison P Wier, Alex T Legocki, Phillip M A Radke, Bryan S Sires
{"title":"The Effect of Supine Versus Upright Positioning on Eyelid Height in the Nonsurgical Patient.","authors":"Garrison P Wier, Alex T Legocki, Phillip M A Radke, Bryan S Sires","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To directly compare margin-reflex distance 1, margin-reflex distance 2, and palpebral fissure in the upright versus supine positions in nonsurgical patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 43 patients (31 female, 12 male, and age range 26-96) were enrolled. Photos were taken in the clinic in the upright and supine position with a ruler placed vertically in the same plane as the eyelid, and the above computer-analyzed measurements were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 86 eyes observed, the average upright margin-reflex distance 1 was 2.97 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.70-3.24), while the average supine margin-reflex distance 1 was 2.38 mm (95% CI, 2.13-2.63). These differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Similarly, statistically significant differences were seen with margin-reflex distance 2 ( p < 0.001), where upright measurements averaged 5.57 mm (95% CI, 5.33-5.81), and supine measurements averaged 5.01 mm (95% CI, 4.73-5.28). Finally, palpebral fissure showed similar significance ( p < 0.001). Upright measurements averaged 8.54 mm (95% CI, 8.19-8.90), while supine measurements averaged 7.38 mm (95% CI, 7.00-7.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Supine positioning provides a decrease in margin-reflex distance 1, margin-reflex distance 2, and palpebral fissure when compared with upright positioning in nonsurgical patients. This contradicts a previous study on intraoperative patients when lidocaine with epinephrine was used. This study helps us better understand the normal physiologic response to position changes with regard to eyelid height in the nonsurgical patient. As such, this study may function as a control for future studies comparing anesthetic/surgical parameter effects on intra- and post-operative eyelid heights.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To directly compare margin-reflex distance 1, margin-reflex distance 2, and palpebral fissure in the upright versus supine positions in nonsurgical patients.

Methods: A total of 43 patients (31 female, 12 male, and age range 26-96) were enrolled. Photos were taken in the clinic in the upright and supine position with a ruler placed vertically in the same plane as the eyelid, and the above computer-analyzed measurements were obtained.

Results: Among the 86 eyes observed, the average upright margin-reflex distance 1 was 2.97 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.70-3.24), while the average supine margin-reflex distance 1 was 2.38 mm (95% CI, 2.13-2.63). These differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Similarly, statistically significant differences were seen with margin-reflex distance 2 ( p < 0.001), where upright measurements averaged 5.57 mm (95% CI, 5.33-5.81), and supine measurements averaged 5.01 mm (95% CI, 4.73-5.28). Finally, palpebral fissure showed similar significance ( p < 0.001). Upright measurements averaged 8.54 mm (95% CI, 8.19-8.90), while supine measurements averaged 7.38 mm (95% CI, 7.00-7.76).

Conclusions: Supine positioning provides a decrease in margin-reflex distance 1, margin-reflex distance 2, and palpebral fissure when compared with upright positioning in nonsurgical patients. This contradicts a previous study on intraoperative patients when lidocaine with epinephrine was used. This study helps us better understand the normal physiologic response to position changes with regard to eyelid height in the nonsurgical patient. As such, this study may function as a control for future studies comparing anesthetic/surgical parameter effects on intra- and post-operative eyelid heights.

仰卧位与直立位对非手术患者眼睑高度的影响
目的:直接比较非手术患者直立位与仰卧位的睑缘反射距离 1、睑缘反射距离 2 和睑裂:共招募了 43 名患者(31 名女性,12 名男性,年龄在 26-96 岁之间)。在诊所拍摄直立位和仰卧位的照片,将直尺垂直放置在眼睑的同一平面上,并通过计算机分析获得上述测量结果:在观察的 86 只眼睛中,直立位眼球边缘-反射距离 1 平均值为 2.97 毫米(95% 置信区间 [CI],2.70-3.24),而仰卧位眼球边缘-反射距离 1 平均值为 2.38 毫米(95% 置信区间 [CI],2.13-2.63)。这些差异具有显著的统计学意义(P < 0.001)。同样,睑缘反射距离 2 也有显著的统计学差异(p < 0.001),直立测量的平均值为 5.57 毫米(95% CI,5.33-5.81),而仰卧测量的平均值为 5.01 毫米(95% CI,4.73-5.28)。最后,睑裂也有类似的意义(P < 0.001)。直立测量的平均值为 8.54 毫米(95% CI,8.19-8.90),而仰卧测量的平均值为 7.38 毫米(95% CI,7.00-7.76):与直立体位相比,非手术患者仰卧体位可减少边缘反射距离 1、边缘反射距离 2 和睑裂。这与之前对术中患者使用含肾上腺素的利多卡因的研究相矛盾。这项研究有助于我们更好地了解非手术患者对眼睑高度体位变化的正常生理反应。因此,这项研究可作为今后比较麻醉/手术参数对术中、术后眼睑高度影响的研究对照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信