Semiautomated MRI-Based Method for Orbital Volume and Contour Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lital Smadar, Mattan Arazi, Gahl Greenberg, Limor Haviv, Or Benifla, Amit Zabatani, Ina Fabian, Mayan Dagan, Joel M Gutovitz, Guy J Ben Simon, Daphna Landau-Prat
{"title":"Semiautomated MRI-Based Method for Orbital Volume and Contour Analysis.","authors":"Lital Smadar, Mattan Arazi, Gahl Greenberg, Limor Haviv, Or Benifla, Amit Zabatani, Ina Fabian, Mayan Dagan, Joel M Gutovitz, Guy J Ben Simon, Daphna Landau-Prat","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The architecture of the orbital cavity is intricate, and precise measurement of its growth is essential for managing ocular and orbital pathologies. Most methods for those measurements are by CT imaging, although MRI for soft tissue assessment is indicated in many cases, specifically pediatric patients. This study introduces a novel semiautomated MRI-based approach for depicting orbital shape and dimensions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with at least 1 normal orbit who underwent both CT and MRI imaging at a single center from 2015 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orbital dimensions included volume, horizontal and vertical lengths, and depth. These were determined by manual segmentation followed by 3-dimensional image processing software.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Differences in orbital measurements between MRI and CT scans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients (mean age 47.7 ± 23.8 years, 21 [67.7%]) females, were included. The mean differences in delta values between orbital measurements on CT versus MRI were: volume 0.03 ± 2.01 ml, horizontal length 0.53 ± 2.12 mm, vertical length, 0.36 ± 2.53 mm, and depth 0.97 ± 3.90 mm. The CT and. MRI orbital measurements were strongly correlated: volume (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), horizontal length (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), vertical length (r = 0.57, p = 0.001), and depth (r = 0.46, p = 0.009). The mean values of all measurements were similar on the paired-samples t test: p = 0.9 for volume (30.86 ± 5.04 ml on CT and 30.88 ± 4.92 ml on MRI), p = 0.2 for horizontal length, p = 0.4 for vertical length, and p = 0.2 for depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We present an innovative semiautomated method capable of calculating orbital volume and demonstrating orbital contour by MRI validated against the gold standard CT-based measurements. This method can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating diverse orbital processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002656","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The architecture of the orbital cavity is intricate, and precise measurement of its growth is essential for managing ocular and orbital pathologies. Most methods for those measurements are by CT imaging, although MRI for soft tissue assessment is indicated in many cases, specifically pediatric patients. This study introduces a novel semiautomated MRI-based approach for depicting orbital shape and dimensions.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Participants: Patients with at least 1 normal orbit who underwent both CT and MRI imaging at a single center from 2015 to 2023.

Methods: Orbital dimensions included volume, horizontal and vertical lengths, and depth. These were determined by manual segmentation followed by 3-dimensional image processing software.

Main outcome measures: Differences in orbital measurements between MRI and CT scans.

Results: Thirty-one patients (mean age 47.7 ± 23.8 years, 21 [67.7%]) females, were included. The mean differences in delta values between orbital measurements on CT versus MRI were: volume 0.03 ± 2.01 ml, horizontal length 0.53 ± 2.12 mm, vertical length, 0.36 ± 2.53 mm, and depth 0.97 ± 3.90 mm. The CT and. MRI orbital measurements were strongly correlated: volume (r = 0.92, p < 0.001), horizontal length (r = 0.65, p < 0.001), vertical length (r = 0.57, p = 0.001), and depth (r = 0.46, p = 0.009). The mean values of all measurements were similar on the paired-samples t test: p = 0.9 for volume (30.86 ± 5.04 ml on CT and 30.88 ± 4.92 ml on MRI), p = 0.2 for horizontal length, p = 0.4 for vertical length, and p = 0.2 for depth.

Conclusions: We present an innovative semiautomated method capable of calculating orbital volume and demonstrating orbital contour by MRI validated against the gold standard CT-based measurements. This method can serve as a valuable tool for evaluating diverse orbital processes.

基于核磁共振成像的半自动眼眶体积和轮廓分析方法。
目的:眶腔的结构错综复杂,精确测量其生长情况对于治疗眼部和眼眶病变至关重要。大多数测量方法都是通过 CT 成像进行的,但核磁共振成像用于软组织评估在许多情况下都是适用的,尤其是儿童患者。本研究介绍了一种基于核磁共振成像的新型半自动方法,用于描述眼眶形状和尺寸:设计:一项回顾性队列研究:2015年至2023年期间在一个中心接受CT和MRI成像的至少有一个正常眼眶的患者:眼眶尺寸包括体积、水平和垂直长度以及深度。主要结果指标:主要结果测量:核磁共振成像和 CT 扫描的眼眶测量值差异:共纳入 31 名患者(平均年龄 47.7 ± 23.8 岁,女性 21 [67.7%])。CT与MRI眼眶测量值的平均差异为:体积(0.03 ± 2.01)毫升,水平长度(0.53 ± 2.12)毫米,垂直长度(0.36 ± 2.53)毫米,深度(0.97 ± 3.90)毫米。CT 和MRI眶内测量值密切相关:体积(r = 0.92,p < 0.001)、水平长度(r = 0.65,p < 0.001)、垂直长度(r = 0.57,p = 0.001)和深度(r = 0.46,p = 0.009)。经配对样本 t 检验,所有测量值的平均值相似:体积 p = 0.9(CT 为 30.86 ± 5.04 ml,MRI 为 30.88 ± 4.92 ml),水平长度 p = 0.2,垂直长度 p = 0.4,深度 p = 0.2:我们介绍了一种创新的半自动方法,该方法能够计算眼眶容积,并通过核磁共振成像显示眼眶轮廓,与基于 CT 的金标准测量结果进行对比验证。该方法可作为评估各种眼眶过程的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
322
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信