Timelines for Return to Different Sports Types After Eight Cervical Spine Fractures in Recreational and Elite Athletes: A Survey of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1097/BSD.0000000000001607
Nicole J Hung, Robert Trigg McClellan, Wellington Hsu, Serena S Hu, Aaron J Clark, Alekos A Theologis
{"title":"Timelines for Return to Different Sports Types After Eight Cervical Spine Fractures in Recreational and Elite Athletes: A Survey of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research.","authors":"Nicole J Hung, Robert Trigg McClellan, Wellington Hsu, Serena S Hu, Aaron J Clark, Alekos A Theologis","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify timelines for when athletes may be considered safe to return to varying athletic activities after sustaining cervical spine fractures.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>While acute management and detection of cervical spine fractures have been areas of comprehensive investigation, insight into timelines for when athletes may return to different athletic activities after sustaining such fractures is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was administered to members of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research that consisted of surgeon demographic information and questions asking when athletes (recreational vs elite) with one of 8 cervical fractures would be allowed to return to play noncontact, contact, and collision sports treated nonoperatively or operatively. The third part queried whether the decision to return to sports was influenced by the type of fixation or the presence of radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three responses were included for analysis. For all 8 cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively and operatively, significantly longer times to return to sports for athletes playing contact or collision sports compared with recreational and elite athletes playing noncontact sports, respectively ( P < 0.05), were felt to be more appropriate. Comparing collision sports with contact sports for recreational and elite athletes, similar times for return to sports for nearly all fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively were noted. In the setting of associated radiculopathy, the most common responses for safe return to play were \"when only motor deficits resolve completely\" and \"when both motor and sensory deficits resolve completely.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this survey of spine surgeons from the Association for Collaborative Spine Research, reasonable timeframes for return to play for athletes with 8 different cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively varied based on fracture subtype and level of sporting physicality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"E404-E414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Prospective cross-sectional survey.

Objective: To identify timelines for when athletes may be considered safe to return to varying athletic activities after sustaining cervical spine fractures.

Background: While acute management and detection of cervical spine fractures have been areas of comprehensive investigation, insight into timelines for when athletes may return to different athletic activities after sustaining such fractures is limited.

Methods: A web-based survey was administered to members of the Association for Collaborative Spine Research that consisted of surgeon demographic information and questions asking when athletes (recreational vs elite) with one of 8 cervical fractures would be allowed to return to play noncontact, contact, and collision sports treated nonoperatively or operatively. The third part queried whether the decision to return to sports was influenced by the type of fixation or the presence of radiculopathy.

Results: Thirty-three responses were included for analysis. For all 8 cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively and operatively, significantly longer times to return to sports for athletes playing contact or collision sports compared with recreational and elite athletes playing noncontact sports, respectively ( P < 0.05), were felt to be more appropriate. Comparing collision sports with contact sports for recreational and elite athletes, similar times for return to sports for nearly all fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively were noted. In the setting of associated radiculopathy, the most common responses for safe return to play were "when only motor deficits resolve completely" and "when both motor and sensory deficits resolve completely."

Conclusions: In this survey of spine surgeons from the Association for Collaborative Spine Research, reasonable timeframes for return to play for athletes with 8 different cervical spine fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively varied based on fracture subtype and level of sporting physicality.

休闲和精英运动员在八处颈椎骨折后恢复不同运动类型的时间表:脊柱研究合作协会调查。
研究设计前瞻性横断面调查:确定运动员在颈椎骨折后何时可以安全地恢复不同的体育活动:背景:虽然颈椎骨折的急性处理和检测一直是全面调查的领域,但对运动员在颈椎骨折后何时可以恢复不同体育活动的时间线的了解却很有限:我们对脊柱研究合作协会的成员进行了一项网络调查,调查内容包括外科医生的人口统计学信息,以及8种颈椎骨折之一的运动员(休闲运动员与精英运动员)何时可以恢复非接触式、接触式和碰撞式运动,接受非手术治疗还是手术治疗。第三部分询问运动员重返运动场的决定是否受固定方式或是否存在根性病变的影响:共有 33 份回复被纳入分析。在所有 8 例颈椎骨折的非手术治疗和手术治疗中,与从事非接触性运动的休闲运动员和精英运动员相比,从事接触性运动或碰撞运动的运动员恢复运动的时间明显更长(P< 0.05),他们认为这样做更合适。将休闲运动和精英运动中的碰撞运动与接触运动进行比较,发现几乎所有骨折的非手术治疗或手术治疗的恢复时间都相似。在伴有根神经病变的情况下,最常见的安全恢复比赛的回答是 "当运动障碍完全消除时 "和 "当运动障碍和感觉障碍都完全消除时":在这项对脊柱研究合作协会的脊柱外科医生进行的调查中,根据骨折亚型和运动体能水平的不同,对8种不同颈椎骨折进行非手术或手术治疗的运动员而言,恢复比赛的合理时限也各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信