Development of a novel seized drug screening method utilizing DART-MS and used weigh paper

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Alleigh N. Couch, J. Tyler Davidson
{"title":"Development of a novel seized drug screening method utilizing DART-MS and used weigh paper","authors":"Alleigh N. Couch,&nbsp;J. Tyler Davidson","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2024.100572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The conventional analytical scheme for seized drug analysis utilizes quick and cost-effective presumptive testing, such as color tests, followed by more discriminatory techniques, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Before the seized drug evidence is analyzed, the evidence is weighed using an appropriate weighing matrix and balance. Typically, the weighing matrix is discarded as chemical waste; however, the process of weighing the evidence leads to the deposition of drug residue onto the weighing matrix, which is then amenable to rapid analysis using ambient ionization approaches, such as direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS). This study demonstrates a DART-MS method for the rapid screening of seized drug evidence using filter paper and glassine paper weighing matrices commonly found in forensic laboratories. Validation experiments were performed using filter paper and glassine paper and compared to the results obtained using glass capillaries to assess the effectiveness of each weighing matrix. A total of 40 authentic samples, 20 filter papers and 20 glassine papers, were analyzed and the resulting spectra were searched using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) DART-MS Forensics Database and Data Interpretation Tool (DIT). When compared to the ground truth GC–MS results, the developed approach had a 90% correct identification rate, with all misidentifications being due to the presence of tablets rather than powder. The developed DART-MS screening method provides the seized drug community with a method to rapidly screen seized drug residue remaining from the weighing process and to improve the overall laboratory efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170924000249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional analytical scheme for seized drug analysis utilizes quick and cost-effective presumptive testing, such as color tests, followed by more discriminatory techniques, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Before the seized drug evidence is analyzed, the evidence is weighed using an appropriate weighing matrix and balance. Typically, the weighing matrix is discarded as chemical waste; however, the process of weighing the evidence leads to the deposition of drug residue onto the weighing matrix, which is then amenable to rapid analysis using ambient ionization approaches, such as direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry (DART-MS). This study demonstrates a DART-MS method for the rapid screening of seized drug evidence using filter paper and glassine paper weighing matrices commonly found in forensic laboratories. Validation experiments were performed using filter paper and glassine paper and compared to the results obtained using glass capillaries to assess the effectiveness of each weighing matrix. A total of 40 authentic samples, 20 filter papers and 20 glassine papers, were analyzed and the resulting spectra were searched using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) DART-MS Forensics Database and Data Interpretation Tool (DIT). When compared to the ground truth GC–MS results, the developed approach had a 90% correct identification rate, with all misidentifications being due to the presence of tablets rather than powder. The developed DART-MS screening method provides the seized drug community with a method to rapidly screen seized drug residue remaining from the weighing process and to improve the overall laboratory efficiency.

Abstract Image

利用 DART-MS 和使用过的称重纸开发新型缉获药物筛选方法
缉获毒品分析的传统分析方法是利用快速和成本效益高的推定测试(如颜色测试),然后采用更具鉴别性的技术,如气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)。在对缉获的毒品证据进行分析之前,要使用适当的称量矩阵和天平对证据进行称量。通常情况下,称量基质会被作为化学废物丢弃;然而,称量证据的过程会导致毒品残留物沉积在称量基质上,然后可利用环境电离方法进行快速分析,如直接分析实时质谱法(DART-MS)。本研究利用法医实验室常见的滤纸和玻璃纸称重基质,展示了一种快速筛查缴获毒品证据的 DART-MS 方法。使用滤纸和玻璃纸进行了验证实验,并与使用玻璃毛细管获得的结果进行了比较,以评估每种称量基质的有效性。共分析了 40 份真实样品(20 份滤纸和 20 份玻璃纸),并使用美国国家标准与技术研究院 (NIST) 的 DART-MS 鉴证数据库和数据解释工具 (DIT) 对所得到的光谱进行了搜索。与地面实况气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)结果相比,所开发的方法具有 90% 的正确鉴定率,所有错误鉴定都是由于存在片剂而非粉末造成的。所开发的 DART-MS 筛查方法为缉毒界提供了一种快速筛查称重过程中残留的缉毒残留物的方法,并提高了实验室的整体效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信