Elena I. Demonterova , Alexey V. Tetenkin , Alexey V. Ivanov , Vladimir A. Lebedev , Dmitrii L. Shergin , Galina V. Pashkova
{"title":"Provenance of the pumice manuports from archaeological sites at the vitim river, East Siberia, Russia","authors":"Elena I. Demonterova , Alexey V. Tetenkin , Alexey V. Ivanov , Vladimir A. Lebedev , Dmitrii L. Shergin , Galina V. Pashkova","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents and discusses the results obtained by X-ray fluorescence and K<img>Ar methods regarding pumice pieces found at two archaeological sites: Ust’-Karenga XVI (9000–8000 cal BP) and Kovrizhka III (∼13,000 cal BP) (Vitim River, Transbaikalia, Russia). K<img>Ar dating and geochemical characteristics of pumice from the Kovrizhka and Ust’-Karenga sites indicate that they are a product of the eruptions of the Udokan volcanic field, and not the Vitim volcanic field, which are two volcanic regions of Transbaikalia. Ancient people residing at both sites were aware of the same resources within the territories, despite the fact that they lived at different times; this is evidenced by the fact that the archaeological material found in the ritual pit of Ust’-Karenga XVI is similar in terms of cultural remains to the archaeological finds of the Kovrizhka group of sites of the age range from ∼6700 to 13,000 cal BP. In this work, we assume that ancient people used not only stone resources but also thermal springs of the territory of the Udokan volcanic field. Based on the paleogeographical data of the region, we reconstruct the possible routes used by ancient humans to deliver and/or exchange raw materials necessary for economic purposes. Our new data in combination with previously published data for Transbaikalia and other regions of Siberia suggest that the connection between the ancient populations living in these areas often persisted at distances >1000 km.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235222672400014X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents and discusses the results obtained by X-ray fluorescence and KAr methods regarding pumice pieces found at two archaeological sites: Ust’-Karenga XVI (9000–8000 cal BP) and Kovrizhka III (∼13,000 cal BP) (Vitim River, Transbaikalia, Russia). KAr dating and geochemical characteristics of pumice from the Kovrizhka and Ust’-Karenga sites indicate that they are a product of the eruptions of the Udokan volcanic field, and not the Vitim volcanic field, which are two volcanic regions of Transbaikalia. Ancient people residing at both sites were aware of the same resources within the territories, despite the fact that they lived at different times; this is evidenced by the fact that the archaeological material found in the ritual pit of Ust’-Karenga XVI is similar in terms of cultural remains to the archaeological finds of the Kovrizhka group of sites of the age range from ∼6700 to 13,000 cal BP. In this work, we assume that ancient people used not only stone resources but also thermal springs of the territory of the Udokan volcanic field. Based on the paleogeographical data of the region, we reconstruct the possible routes used by ancient humans to deliver and/or exchange raw materials necessary for economic purposes. Our new data in combination with previously published data for Transbaikalia and other regions of Siberia suggest that the connection between the ancient populations living in these areas often persisted at distances >1000 km.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.