Resolution of Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Megan Abrams, Sarah Sears, Susan Wherley, Stephen Rhodes, Jeffrey Mangel, David Sheyn
{"title":"Resolution of Overactive Bladder Symptoms After Anterior and Apical Prolapse Repair.","authors":"Megan Abrams, Sarah Sears, Susan Wherley, Stephen Rhodes, Jeffrey Mangel, David Sheyn","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patients often present with both overactive bladder (OAB) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) concerns. It is unknown whether treatment of POP improves OAB.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether OAB improves after anterior/apical POP repair for anterior wall prolapse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective study of women with anterior/apical prolapse at or beyond the hymen and concomitant OAB symptoms, undergoing apical repair. Overactive bladder severity was evaluated with the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) questionnaire and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 preoperatively and 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was a reduction of ≥11 points or greater on the UDI-6 at 6 months. Those who reported an ≥11-point reduction were termed responders. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with reduction in OAB symptoms after POP surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 117 patients met the criteria for analysis, with 79.5% reporting improved OAB symptoms after POP repair at 6 months. There were no preoperative differences between groups. The mean preoperative UDI-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores were higher in the responder group (51.1 ± 16.8 vs 26.4 ± 15.1 [P < 0.001] and 44.6 ± 23.8 vs 22.8 ± 21.4 [P = 0.001], respectively), and the presence of detrusor overactivity was lower (29.0% vs 54.2%, P = 0.02). After regression, a higher preoperative UDI-6 total was associated with an increased likelihood of symptom improvement at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 per point [1.08-1.19]), whereas detrusor overactivity on preoperative urodynamics was associated with a decreased likelihood of OAB symptom improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.10 [0.02-0.44]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overactive bladder symptoms improve in the majority of patients undergoing apical repair for anterior/apical prolapse beyond the hymen.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patients often present with both overactive bladder (OAB) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) concerns. It is unknown whether treatment of POP improves OAB.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether OAB improves after anterior/apical POP repair for anterior wall prolapse.

Study design: This was a prospective study of women with anterior/apical prolapse at or beyond the hymen and concomitant OAB symptoms, undergoing apical repair. Overactive bladder severity was evaluated with the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) questionnaire and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 preoperatively and 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome was a reduction of ≥11 points or greater on the UDI-6 at 6 months. Those who reported an ≥11-point reduction were termed responders. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with reduction in OAB symptoms after POP surgery.

Results: A total of 117 patients met the criteria for analysis, with 79.5% reporting improved OAB symptoms after POP repair at 6 months. There were no preoperative differences between groups. The mean preoperative UDI-6 and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 scores were higher in the responder group (51.1 ± 16.8 vs 26.4 ± 15.1 [P < 0.001] and 44.6 ± 23.8 vs 22.8 ± 21.4 [P = 0.001], respectively), and the presence of detrusor overactivity was lower (29.0% vs 54.2%, P = 0.02). After regression, a higher preoperative UDI-6 total was associated with an increased likelihood of symptom improvement at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 per point [1.08-1.19]), whereas detrusor overactivity on preoperative urodynamics was associated with a decreased likelihood of OAB symptom improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 0.10 [0.02-0.44]).

Conclusion: Overactive bladder symptoms improve in the majority of patients undergoing apical repair for anterior/apical prolapse beyond the hymen.

前脱垂和顶脱垂修复术后膀胱过度活动症状的缓解
重要性:患者往往同时伴有膀胱过度活动症(OAB)和盆腔器官脱垂(POP)问题。目前尚不清楚治疗 POP 是否能改善 OAB:本研究旨在评估前壁脱垂的前方/腹侧 POP 修复术后 OAB 是否有所改善:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是接受顶端修复术的前/顶端脱垂位于处女膜或超过处女膜且伴有 OAB 症状的女性。膀胱过度活动的严重程度在术前和术后2、6、12和24周通过泌尿生殖器压力量表-6(UDI-6)问卷和尿失禁影响问卷-7进行评估。主要结果是 6 个月时 UDI-6 降低≥11 分或更多。报告降幅≥11分者称为应答者。研究人员进行了多变量回归分析,以评估 POP 手术后 OAB 症状减轻的相关因素:共有117名患者符合分析标准,其中79.5%的患者在POP修复术后6个月报告OAB症状有所改善。各组间术前无差异。应答组的术前 UDI-6 和尿失禁影响问卷-7 平均得分更高(分别为 51.1 ± 16.8 vs 26.4 ± 15.1 [P < 0.001] 和 44.6 ± 23.8 vs 22.8 ± 21.4 [P = 0.001]),存在逼尿肌过度活动的比例更低(29.0% vs 54.2%,P = 0.02)。经过回归分析,术前 UDI-6 总值越高,6 个月后症状改善的可能性越大(调整后的几率比,每点 1.14 [1.08-1.19]),而术前尿动力学检查发现的逼尿肌过度活动与 OAB 症状改善的可能性降低有关(调整后的几率比,0.10 [0.02-0.44]):结论:大多数接受顶端修复术治疗处女膜外前/顶端脱垂的患者的膀胱过度活动症状都会得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信