Long-Term Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Independent Series with At Least 10 Years of Follow-up.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-03-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00057
J Molloy, C Handford, J Coolican, T Molloy, W Walter
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Independent Series with At Least 10 Years of Follow-up.","authors":"J Molloy, C Handford, J Coolican, T Molloy, W Walter","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) provides an attractive alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the management of osteoarthritis in younger, more active patients; however, concerns persist over complications specific to HRA. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the documented long-term survival rates of the metal-on-metal BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System at a follow-up of at least 10 years and to analyze the functional outcomes and cause of failures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was undertaken of all published cohort studies available in the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed research databases up to December 2021, as recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction was focused on survival rates, causes of failure, and functional outcomes. Survival estimates at 10 years were pooled in a meta-analysis, with each series weighted by its variance. Causes of failure were presented as a percentage of the pooled revisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 studies were identified, encompassing 3,129 cases. Across the 9 studies that had reported a mean follow-up, the mean follow-up was 11.7 years (range, 9.55 to 13.7 years). We found a pooled 10-year survival rate of 95.5% (95% confidence interval, 93.4% to 97.1%). There were 149 revisions among the studies (range, 4 to 38 revisions per study), a rate of 4.8% of the total procedures performed. The 2 main causes of revision were aseptic loosening (20.1% of revisions) and adverse reactions to metal debris (20.1%). There were no revisions for dislocation. Of the studies that reported preoperative functional scores, all reported significant improvement in mean scores postoperatively except for 1 study in which the mean Tegner activity score did not significantly improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When performed for appropriate indications, patients undergoing an HRA with use of the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System can expect good implant survivorship at 10 years with acceptable functional results and low rates of dislocation and infection. This systematic review, however, confirms concerns regarding adverse reactions to metal debris as a leading cause of revision.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10959564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) provides an attractive alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for the management of osteoarthritis in younger, more active patients; however, concerns persist over complications specific to HRA. The aims of this systematic review were to assess the documented long-term survival rates of the metal-on-metal BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System at a follow-up of at least 10 years and to analyze the functional outcomes and cause of failures.

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken of all published cohort studies available in the MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed research databases up to December 2021, as recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction was focused on survival rates, causes of failure, and functional outcomes. Survival estimates at 10 years were pooled in a meta-analysis, with each series weighted by its variance. Causes of failure were presented as a percentage of the pooled revisions.

Results: A total of 11 studies were identified, encompassing 3,129 cases. Across the 9 studies that had reported a mean follow-up, the mean follow-up was 11.7 years (range, 9.55 to 13.7 years). We found a pooled 10-year survival rate of 95.5% (95% confidence interval, 93.4% to 97.1%). There were 149 revisions among the studies (range, 4 to 38 revisions per study), a rate of 4.8% of the total procedures performed. The 2 main causes of revision were aseptic loosening (20.1% of revisions) and adverse reactions to metal debris (20.1%). There were no revisions for dislocation. Of the studies that reported preoperative functional scores, all reported significant improvement in mean scores postoperatively except for 1 study in which the mean Tegner activity score did not significantly improve.

Conclusions: When performed for appropriate indications, patients undergoing an HRA with use of the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System can expect good implant survivorship at 10 years with acceptable functional results and low rates of dislocation and infection. This systematic review, however, confirms concerns regarding adverse reactions to metal debris as a leading cause of revision.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

伯明翰髋关节置换术的长期疗效:至少随访 10 年的独立系列系统回顾。
背景:髋关节置换术(HRA)是替代全髋关节置换术(THA)治疗年轻、多动患者骨关节炎的一种极具吸引力的方法;然而,HRA特有的并发症仍令人担忧。本系统性综述的目的是评估金属BIRMINGHAM髋关节置换系统在至少10年的随访中的有记录的长期存活率,并分析其功能结果和失败原因:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南的建议,对截至 2021 年 12 月 MEDLINE、Cochrane、Embase 和 PubMed 研究数据库中所有已发表的队列研究进行了系统综述。数据提取的重点是存活率、失败原因和功能结果。在荟萃分析中汇总了10年的存活率估计值,并根据每个系列的方差进行加权。失败原因以汇总修订的百分比表示:共确定了 11 项研究,涉及 3,129 个病例。在9项报告了平均随访时间的研究中,平均随访时间为11.7年(范围为9.55至13.7年)。我们发现,汇总的 10 年生存率为 95.5%(95% 置信区间为 93.4% 至 97.1%)。在所有研究中,共有 149 例手术进行了翻修(每项研究的翻修次数在 4 到 38 次之间),翻修率占手术总数的 4.8%。翻修的两个主要原因是无菌性松动(占翻修的20.1%)和金属碎片的不良反应(20.1%)。没有因脱位而进行的翻修。在报告了术前功能评分的研究中,除了一项研究的平均Tegner活动评分没有明显改善外,其他研究都报告了术后平均评分的显著改善:结论:在适应症适当的情况下,使用 BIRMINGHAM HIP Reurfacing 系统进行 HRA 手术的患者可望在 10 年后获得良好的植入存活率,功能效果可接受,脱位和感染率较低。然而,本系统综述证实了对金属碎片不良反应的担忧,这是导致翻修的主要原因:证据级别:治疗四级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信