Ultrasensitive Response Explains the Benefit of Combination Chemotherapy Despite Drug Antagonism.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sarah C Patterson, Amy E Pomeroy, Adam C Palmer
{"title":"Ultrasensitive Response Explains the Benefit of Combination Chemotherapy Despite Drug Antagonism.","authors":"Sarah C Patterson, Amy E Pomeroy, Adam C Palmer","doi":"10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-23-0642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most aggressive lymphomas are treated with combination chemotherapy, commonly as multiple cycles of concurrent drug administration. Concurrent administration is in theory optimal when combination therapies have synergistic (more than additive) drug interactions. We investigated pharmacodynamic interactions in the standard 4-drug \"CHOP\" regimen in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) cell lines and found that CHOP consistently exhibits antagonism and not synergy. We tested whether staggered treatment schedules could improve tumor cell kill by avoiding antagonism, using in vitro models of concurrent or staggered treatments. Surprisingly, we observed that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent drug administration despite antagonistic drug-drug interactions. We propose that an ultrasensitive dose response, as described in radiology by the linear-quadratic (LQ) model, can reconcile these seemingly contradictory experimental observations. The LQ model describes the relationship between cell survival and dose, and in radiology has identified scenarios favoring hypofractionated radiotherapy-the administration of fewer large doses rather than multiple smaller doses. Specifically, hypofractionated treatment can be favored when cells require an accumulation of DNA damage, rather than a \"single hit,\" to die. By adapting the LQ model to combination chemotherapy and accounting for tumor heterogeneity, we find that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent administration of multiple drugs, even when chemotherapies have antagonistic interactions. Thus, our study identifies a new mechanism by which combination chemotherapy can be clinically beneficial that is not contingent on positive drug-drug interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18791,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Cancer Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"995-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11219261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Cancer Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-23-0642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most aggressive lymphomas are treated with combination chemotherapy, commonly as multiple cycles of concurrent drug administration. Concurrent administration is in theory optimal when combination therapies have synergistic (more than additive) drug interactions. We investigated pharmacodynamic interactions in the standard 4-drug "CHOP" regimen in peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) cell lines and found that CHOP consistently exhibits antagonism and not synergy. We tested whether staggered treatment schedules could improve tumor cell kill by avoiding antagonism, using in vitro models of concurrent or staggered treatments. Surprisingly, we observed that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent drug administration despite antagonistic drug-drug interactions. We propose that an ultrasensitive dose response, as described in radiology by the linear-quadratic (LQ) model, can reconcile these seemingly contradictory experimental observations. The LQ model describes the relationship between cell survival and dose, and in radiology has identified scenarios favoring hypofractionated radiotherapy-the administration of fewer large doses rather than multiple smaller doses. Specifically, hypofractionated treatment can be favored when cells require an accumulation of DNA damage, rather than a "single hit," to die. By adapting the LQ model to combination chemotherapy and accounting for tumor heterogeneity, we find that tumor cell kill is maximized by concurrent administration of multiple drugs, even when chemotherapies have antagonistic interactions. Thus, our study identifies a new mechanism by which combination chemotherapy can be clinically beneficial that is not contingent on positive drug-drug interactions.

超敏反应解释了联合化疗在药物拮抗作用下仍能获益的原因。
大多数侵袭性淋巴瘤都采用联合化疗,通常是多个周期同时用药。理论上,当联合疗法具有协同(大于相加)的药物相互作用时,同时给药是最佳选择。我们研究了外周 T 细胞淋巴瘤(PTCL)细胞系中标准四药 "CHOP "方案的药效学相互作用,发现 CHOP 始终表现出拮抗作用而非协同作用。我们利用同时或交错治疗的体外模型,测试了交错治疗计划是否能避免拮抗作用,从而提高对肿瘤细胞的杀伤力。令人惊讶的是,我们观察到,尽管药物与药物之间存在拮抗作用,但同时给药能最大限度地杀伤肿瘤细胞。我们提出,放射学中的线性-四次方(LQ)模型所描述的超灵敏剂量反应可以调和这些看似矛盾的实验观察结果。LQ 模型描述了细胞存活与剂量之间的关系,并在放射学中确定了有利于低分次放射治疗的方案--施用较少的大剂量而不是多个较小剂量。具体来说,当细胞需要DNA损伤的累积而不是 "单次打击 "才能死亡时,低分次治疗就会受到青睐。通过将 LQ 模型应用于联合化疗并考虑肿瘤的异质性,我们发现,即使化疗药物之间存在拮抗作用,同时使用多种药物也能最大限度地杀死肿瘤细胞。因此,我们的研究发现了联合化疗对临床有益的新机制,而这种机制并不取决于药物间的正相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Cancer Therapeutics will focus on basic research that has implications for cancer therapeutics in the following areas: Experimental Cancer Therapeutics, Identification of Molecular Targets, Targets for Chemoprevention, New Models, Cancer Chemistry and Drug Discovery, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, Molecular Classification of Tumors, and Bioinformatics and Computational Molecular Biology. The journal provides a publication forum for these emerging disciplines that is focused specifically on cancer research. Papers are stringently reviewed and only those that report results of novel, timely, and significant research and meet high standards of scientific merit will be accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信