Increased symptoms of stiffness after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy are associated with worse postoperative knee function outcomes and lower patient satisfaction rate.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Jiahao Yu, Bixuan Song, Yanbin Zhu, Juan Wang, Yingze Zhang
{"title":"Increased symptoms of stiffness after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy are associated with worse postoperative knee function outcomes and lower patient satisfaction rate.","authors":"Jiahao Yu, Bixuan Song, Yanbin Zhu, Juan Wang, Yingze Zhang","doi":"10.1177/10225536241241890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptoms of knee stiffness after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) can significantly affect surgical effectiveness, but no studies have reported risk factors for knee stiffness after OW-HTO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated with OW-HTO for the first time between 2018 and 2021 were included. Data were collected on patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form (SF) 12 scores, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and patient satisfaction before and after surgery. Patients with worse WOMAC stiffness scores at 1 year were defined as the 'increased stiffness' group and the other cohort as the 'non-stiffness' group. The primary outcome of the study was to compare postoperative knee function scores (WOMAC and SF-12), HKA and patient satisfaction rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the use of logistic regression to analyze independent predictors of increased postoperative stiffness symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1 year postoperatively, 95 (11.3%) patients had a significant increase in stiffness. Patients had significantly (<i>p</i> < .001) less improvement in pain, function, and total WOMAC scores, and SF-12 score than those in the non-stiffness group (<i>n</i> = 745). However, the differences in WOMAC and SF-12 scores in increased stiffness group at 1 year post-operatively were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < .001) compared to the non-stiffness group. There was no statistically significant difference in HKA in the increased stiffness group (172.9° ± 2.3°) compared to non-stiffness group (173.4° ± 2.6°) at 1 year postoperatively (<i>p</i> = .068). Patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the increased stiffness group (<i>p</i> < .001). Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 1.809, <i>p</i> = .034) and preoperative WOMAC stiffness score of 44 or less (OR 4.255 <i>p</i> < .001) were predictors of increased stiffness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with increased stiffness after OW-HTO had worse functional outcomes and lower patient satisfaction rates and patients at risk of being in this group should be informed pre-operatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 1","pages":"10225536241241890"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241241890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Symptoms of knee stiffness after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OW-HTO) can significantly affect surgical effectiveness, but no studies have reported risk factors for knee stiffness after OW-HTO.

Methods: Patients treated with OW-HTO for the first time between 2018 and 2021 were included. Data were collected on patient demographics, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form (SF) 12 scores, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and patient satisfaction before and after surgery. Patients with worse WOMAC stiffness scores at 1 year were defined as the 'increased stiffness' group and the other cohort as the 'non-stiffness' group. The primary outcome of the study was to compare postoperative knee function scores (WOMAC and SF-12), HKA and patient satisfaction rate between the two groups. The secondary outcome was the use of logistic regression to analyze independent predictors of increased postoperative stiffness symptoms.

Results: At 1 year postoperatively, 95 (11.3%) patients had a significant increase in stiffness. Patients had significantly (p < .001) less improvement in pain, function, and total WOMAC scores, and SF-12 score than those in the non-stiffness group (n = 745). However, the differences in WOMAC and SF-12 scores in increased stiffness group at 1 year post-operatively were statistically significant (p < .001) compared to the non-stiffness group. There was no statistically significant difference in HKA in the increased stiffness group (172.9° ± 2.3°) compared to non-stiffness group (173.4° ± 2.6°) at 1 year postoperatively (p = .068). Patient satisfaction was significantly lower in the increased stiffness group (p < .001). Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 1.809, p = .034) and preoperative WOMAC stiffness score of 44 or less (OR 4.255 p < .001) were predictors of increased stiffness.

Conclusions: Patients with increased stiffness after OW-HTO had worse functional outcomes and lower patient satisfaction rates and patients at risk of being in this group should be informed pre-operatively.

开刃式高胫骨截骨术后僵硬症状的增加与术后膝关节功能预后较差和患者满意度较低有关。
背景:开放性楔形高胫骨截骨术(OW-HTO)后膝关节僵硬的症状会严重影响手术效果,但目前还没有研究报道OW-HTO后膝关节僵硬的风险因素:纳入2018年至2021年间首次接受OW-HTO治疗的患者。收集了患者人口统计学、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、短表格(SF)12评分、髋-膝-踝角度(HKA)以及术前术后患者满意度等数据。1年后WOMAC僵硬度评分较差的患者被定义为 "僵硬度增加 "组,其他组别被定义为 "无僵硬度 "组。研究的主要结果是比较两组患者的术后膝关节功能评分(WOMAC和SF-12)、HKA和患者满意度。次要结果是使用逻辑回归分析术后僵硬症状加重的独立预测因素:术后 1 年,95 例(11.3%)患者的僵硬症状明显加重。与非僵硬组(n = 745)相比,患者在疼痛、功能、WOMAC 总分和 SF-12 评分方面的改善幅度明显较小(p < .001)。然而,与非僵硬组相比,僵硬增加组术后1年的WOMAC和SF-12评分差异有统计学意义(P < .001)。术后 1 年,僵硬度增加组的 HKA(172.9° ± 2.3°)与非僵硬度组(173.4° ± 2.6°)相比,差异无统计学意义(p = .068)。僵硬度增加组的患者满意度明显较低(p < .001)。逻辑回归分析显示,糖尿病(几率比(OR)1.809,p = .034)和术前WOMAC僵硬度评分44分或以下(OR 4.255,p < .001)是预测僵硬度增加的因素:结论:OW-HTO 术后僵硬度增加的患者功能预后较差,患者满意度也较低,因此术前应告知有可能成为此类患者的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信