Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is an optimal option for second-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anti-Cancer Drugs Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-22 DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000001607
Ping Yang, Tao Pan, Ming-Kun Wang, Meng-Sheng Xiao, Shuang Zhang, Sha Liu
{"title":"Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy is an optimal option for second-line treatment for advanced gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Ping Yang, Tao Pan, Ming-Kun Wang, Meng-Sheng Xiao, Shuang Zhang, Sha Liu","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of programmed cell death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) have offered new treatment options for several cancers, but the clinical benefit of tislelizumab in the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still murky. Thus, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with GEJ cancer. In this study, 90 GEJ patients were retrospectively enrolled including 45 patients who received chemotherapy plus tislelizumab while 45 underwent chemotherapy only. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events between two arms. The ORR was significantly higher in the tislelizumab group than in patients with chemotherapy alone (71.1 vs. 44.4%). The PFS [54.7% (47.2-62.2) vs. 33.3% (26.3-40.3), P  = 0.047] and OS [62.1% (54.5-69.7) vs. 40.0% (32.5-47.5), P  = 0.031] were also significantly improved in patients with concomitant use of tislelizumab. When stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 also with significantly higher PFS and OS when taking tislelizumab ( P  = 0.015 and P  = 0.038). The incidence of hematologic toxicity was similar in the combination arm compared to the chemotherapy alone arm and the number of adverse events was not significantly increased by adding tislelizumab (all P  > 0.05). Concomitant use of tislelizumab and chemotherapy in GEJ patients may be with optimal therapeutic effect and similar incidence of adverse events than chemotherapy alone. Further studies with larger number of patients are warranted to confirm it.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"666-671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of programmed cell death receptor-1 and its ligand (PD-L1) have offered new treatment options for several cancers, but the clinical benefit of tislelizumab in the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still murky. Thus, we aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in patients with GEJ cancer. In this study, 90 GEJ patients were retrospectively enrolled including 45 patients who received chemotherapy plus tislelizumab while 45 underwent chemotherapy only. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and safety was assessed by treatment-related adverse events between two arms. The ORR was significantly higher in the tislelizumab group than in patients with chemotherapy alone (71.1 vs. 44.4%). The PFS [54.7% (47.2-62.2) vs. 33.3% (26.3-40.3), P  = 0.047] and OS [62.1% (54.5-69.7) vs. 40.0% (32.5-47.5), P  = 0.031] were also significantly improved in patients with concomitant use of tislelizumab. When stratified by PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS), patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 also with significantly higher PFS and OS when taking tislelizumab ( P  = 0.015 and P  = 0.038). The incidence of hematologic toxicity was similar in the combination arm compared to the chemotherapy alone arm and the number of adverse events was not significantly increased by adding tislelizumab (all P  > 0.05). Concomitant use of tislelizumab and chemotherapy in GEJ patients may be with optimal therapeutic effect and similar incidence of adverse events than chemotherapy alone. Further studies with larger number of patients are warranted to confirm it.

替斯利珠单抗加化疗是晚期胃食管交界处腺癌二线治疗的最佳选择。
程序性细胞死亡受体-1及其配体(PD-L1)的开发为多种癌症提供了新的治疗方案,但替斯利珠单抗对胃食管交界处(GEJ)腺癌的临床疗效仍不明确。因此,我们旨在研究替斯利珠单抗联合化疗对胃食管连接部腺癌患者的疗效和安全性。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地纳入了90例胃癌患者,其中45例接受了化疗加替雷利珠单抗治疗,45例仅接受了化疗。研究估算了两组患者的总反应率(ORR)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),并通过治疗相关不良事件评估了安全性。tislelizumab组的ORR明显高于单纯化疗组(71.1%对44.4%)。同时使用替斯利珠单抗的患者的PFS [54.7% (47.2-62.2) vs. 33.3% (26.3-40.3),P = 0.047]和OS [62.1% (54.5-69.7) vs. 40.0% (32.5-47.5),P = 0.031]也显著改善。如果按PD-L1联合阳性评分(CPS)进行分层,PD-L1 CPS≥1的患者服用替斯利珠单抗后,PFS和OS也明显提高(P = 0.015和P = 0.038)。与单用化疗组相比,联合用药组的血液学毒性发生率相似,加入替斯利珠单抗后不良事件的数量也没有明显增加(P均>0.05)。在胃食管癌患者中同时使用替斯利珠单抗和化疗可能会获得最佳疗效,且不良反应发生率与单独化疗相似。我们有必要对更多患者进行进一步研究,以证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信